Essay About 1890S Doctors And Voluntary Sodomy

Abortion – Race and Gender
Essay Preview: Abortion – Race and Gender
Report this essay
Brian Kesser
Race and Gender
Abortion?
Should a woman have a choice? This is the question that has plagued
governments the world over for more than a century. Today, in the United States, she
does. It was not always this way though. It was not until 1973 that women could legally
choose whether or not to give birth to their unborn fetuses in the United States. This
subject strikes a sore spot primarily for religious groups all over the world. So should a
woman be given the right to choose her fate and the fate of the child inside her? If that
right is taken away will she find alternate means? How do we decide where the line
should be drawn between that what we believe is right and the freedoms we so cherish?
In the 1890s doctors estimated that there were two million abortions per year.
Today there a one and a half. (Feminist, 2) Determined woman throughout the world and
throughout the ages have always found ways to terminate unwanted pregnancies by
whatever means they could. This fact alone tells us that this is not an issue that we
can just sweep under the rug and forget. There have always been available options by
which women could end a pregnancy, some of them are just more grotesque than others.
The “Coat hanger Effect” has been used to describe what can happen when
abortion is made illegal. Women have all too often subjected themselves to
voluntary sodomy with such crude instruments as coat hangers, sowing needles, curtain
rods, ice picks and even bicycle pumps. An estimated five percent of all criminal
abortions were performed by the woman herself (Abortion Practices, 2&3). That averages
out to about one hundred thousand per year.
Physical mutilation was not the only means used before legalization. Women
often used lye products, pine oil, drain cleaners and even bleach. Some relied on
overdosing on strong prescription drugs. This kind of gives a new ring to the phrase “Pick
your poison”. The fact of the matter is from 1950 to 1970 well over a thousand women
died from criminal abortions in the United States alone. Pro-life activists say that eighty-
nine percent of all illegal abortions in the United States were performed by
physicians (Abortion Practices, 1). If this number is correct, why were so many women
dying? Medical practices have obviously evolved over the last thirty years, but what kind
of “Doctors” were doing these procedures? Many women could not afford a skilled
abortionist so they went to whomever told them that they knew how and could do it for
cheep, but money was not always the only form of payment required. Sexual servitude
was also a common method of affording such a procedure. In 1969 seventy-five percent
of the women who died from abortions in the U.S. were women of color (Feminist, 3).
Because of its deep rooted religious facets, abortion has always been a major
media hot button. With the outcome of Roe vs. Wade on January 22, 1973 legalizing
abortion, a door was opened that has allowed for public controversy to flourish in all
aspects of media. Many a magazine cover or a front page have dawned stories of public
outcries pulling either in favor of or against the controversial topic. Unfortunately, many
of these reports have to do with violence inflicted upon helpless clinic workers. Over two
hundred clinics have been bombed since the seventies (Feminist, 6). Groups such as
Operation Rescue have used harassment, terrorism and even violence to try and get their
message across. But at what point do these so called soldiers of God cross the line of
hypocrisy and become “murders” instead of activists? How can someone who claims to
be fighting for the right to life in turn take one themselves? Ignorance is the answer, it is
also the sparkplug that ignites the Medias attention.
Technology and the newly found access to information has allowed for many who
would otherwise have little to no opinion to become advocates on one side or the other.
The media, internet and other proprietors of mass information have played a crucial role
in the evolution of pro-life/pro-choice movements. Statistics and reports have opened up
new arenas for argument. The fact that sixteen states still have pre-1973 anti-abortion
laws on the books is a perfect example of why pro-choice advocates are still fighting for
what has already been deemed