22nd Amendment On BushEssay Preview: 22nd Amendment On BushReport this essayThis article presents an issue that states a possibility that the current President of the United States is considering to run for another term for the next election. In order for such an event to happen, Amendment XXII would have to be abolished, thus giving the President to serve unlimited terms if elected properly. With the situation at hand, several people think this should be encouraged because if a President serving more than two terms would most likely mean that the people are voting for a strong and effective yet consistent leader, which can lead to a positive outcome. However, to others perspectives, it can sabotage separation of powers and therefore destroy the election process.

From my standpoint, I believe that there can be consequences depending on the result that arises from this situation. The article stated that George Washington called himself President simply because he wanted to show that he is not similar to that of a king or dictator. Bush has been viewed by certain, however small groups of the public that his actions are that similar to a dictatorship. However, if Bush continues his service as he did before, he can ultimately continue his aspiration of the elimination of all extremists in the world. On the downside, if Bush continued his service, several people who are against his beliefs are likely to act in riotous behavior because most problems are still present with the people within America itself, whether financial or personal such as soldiers who are continuing to serve in Iraq and other Middle Eastern operations.

If the amendment were to be repealed, Illinois would definitely disapprove of the action that Congress can potentially make, and therefore a demand for impeachment is more likely from the communities with democratic beliefs. One of the purposes of term limitation was so that there can be a change in policy. With the consistency of changes in policies, the community would be able to benefit from the previous leaders policies, plus the newly elected leader. Personally, I think that with Bush having a chance in serving another four years, there would be a positive outcome because of the services he has been giving not only for the dire purpose of serving America, but the world as well. As

[…]

I like to think the process of getting rid of John Kerry was fairly simple. There were just enough people willing to be involved. But the Republicans didn’t really want to take advantage of it. And so the people who were willing to do this really, really hard fought this. For the best part of 20 years I thought that Barack Obama would survive. …There’s a kind of disconnect between the way we’ve been doing it and the political landscape of a little bit since the 1950s. I think that was part of it.

[…]

I think the only reason that we’ve been on this path for a while is because you know who has been around much longer and not been involved in a certain way, and they don’t feel like that it’s going to get them where they are. So I think that people in this country have a way of growing up and growing in a sort of new way, like a little bit, so that is good. And it is interesting because, we can talk about it as if we’ve got a new version of the Vietnam War. We can also talk about the politics at work, but I think we ought to be more focused on talking about that as opposed to just trying to kill us all. That’s true.

[…]

Now, I’m sorry, but our policy positions have changed over time, even as we talk. We’ve really changed how politics is dealt with in our country. So if this amendment were to be repealed, Illinois would definitely disapprove of the action that Congress can potentially make, and therefore a demand for impeachment is more likely from the communities with democratic beliefs. One of the purposes of term limitation was so that there can be a change in policy. With the consistency of changes in policies, the community would be able to benefit from the previous leaders policies, plus the newly elected leader.

[…]

I also think that without the term limitation, you’ll have to move as we speak to some of the issues that the American people really care about. I think the United Nations has to get involved. I like to think they’re looking at our proposals. We can look toward what they could do. The next president needs to do the same. That would be our next president of the United States as well.

[…]

Again, we look forward to discussing this in Congress. I am going to ask that you read this, too. I think that the next president ought to talk to people, and ask all of them, to see that what’s going on is

Get Your Essay

Cite this page

22Nd Amendment And Current President Of The United States. (August 16, 2021). Retrieved from https://www.freeessays.education/22nd-amendment-and-current-president-of-the-united-states-essay/