Political Culture And Civic Culture
Essay Preview: Political Culture And Civic Culture
Report this essay
How does the concept of Ðcivic culture differ from that of Ðpolitical culture? To what extent can the latter explain why the politics of countries differ?
“When we speak of the political culture, we refer to the political system as internalized in cognitions, feelings, and evaluations of its population.”
Almond and Verba
In their classic 1963 study, Civic Culture, political culture was defined within very narrow parameters, concerning only Ðpolitical attitudes. This neglected the existence of other non-psychological factors such as political skills and race that played an equally important role in influencing the political system as political culture. This is one of the many limits of political culture. However, in this essay we will realize that despite the limits of political culture, it is nevertheless an imperative political characteristic of a country. Almond & Verbas ideology of a civic culture has its limits as well. Despite this similiarity, these two forms of cultures have broad differences.
Being a fairly new theory and also a touchstone in the study of political culture, Almond and Verbas idea of civic and political culture has been under speculation by other political professionals. This essay will define civic culture and inspect its criticisms. We will then inspect the contrasts between civic and political culture, as will be evident when defining political culture. I will then advance to study the effectiveness of the theory of political culture in three different scenarios. Through understanding the limits of political culture, we will be able to briefly consider the existence of other factors aside from Ðpolitical attitudes that could affect governmental policies.
Civic Culture
The idea of a civic culture emerged in 1963, from a classic study entitled Civic Culture by Almond and Verba. In this study, a survey was conducted in five different countries to identify what type of political culture would be the most appropriate for a liberal democracy to successfully develop.
Through this, Almond and Verba had also identified three different forms of Ðpure culture; namely the Parochial Culture, where the citizens are hardly aware of the existence of a government as the policies created do not have a strong impact in their lives. This culture is especially evident among tribes such as the Dayak tribes in Borneo who live far from the centre and hence seeing little importance of policies, such as the implementation of road fines, in their daily lives.
The second culture is the Subject Culture, where citizens view themselves as subjects to the government, not as participants actively contributing to and benefiting from a political process. This culture would exist in situations where people are not given the right to voice out their opinions and are forced to heed one governing body. The most extreme example could be in the Roman dictatorship during 360 BC, where the dictator was granted absolute power and the people could not participate in the political arena.
The last type of culture is the Participant Culture. It is this form of culture that has grown to be most favorable as it is where citizens believe they could contribute to the political systems and are yet affected by it. Such a culture could be prominent in countries such as New Zealand that have strong liberal democracies.
However, as many would suppose having a Participant Culture across the nation would be the best foundation for a liberal democracy, it is interesting to find that Almond and Verba had come up with opposing theories. They believed the combination of all three of the above cultures would be the best Ðpolitical culture for the establishment of a liberal democracy. This certain combination is termed Civic Culture.
Therefore, a civic culture is a society where the majority is of a participant culture so as to make up the active, participative part of society. The remaining minority is to possess a mix of parochial and subject attitudes to provide stability to the growth of participant culture. Having this adequate mix of active citizens as well as citizens who are passive resolves tension that would usually arise from an over active democracy. This creates a situation where the citizens are given the right to vote and express their needs yet also allowing the government to retain authority and practice some influence. Almond and Verba assumed Britain has the closest resemblance to this civic model, followed by the US.
A wave of criticisms responded to this new theory. Almond and Verba had even published a new book, Civic Culture Revisited, where they had acknowledged some of their shortcomings. Among the criticisms received were that Almond and Verba had not specified the origins of such a culture Ð- how can such a culture be achieved and sustained? It is unfortunate that Almond and Verba had gotten to lengths explaining the civic culture but had not specified how it can be achieved. Additionally, no thought was given to the possibility of an evolution of the civic culture. As all factors such as attitudes and sentiments are bound to continuous change, Almond and Verba had not specified how and what the culture might evolve into and if not, how we could be able to retain it.
Another criticism sharing some similarity with the limits of political culture is the emphasis on psychological factors, such as individual attitudes, towards the political system. Although political and civic culture does acknowledge the impact of a countrys history on the political process, both fail to take into consideration the existence of structural differences such as the personality of leaders and individuals, that can play a part in shaping the political process too.
Political Culture
The term Ðpolitical culture has a simpler definition to it. It is “the sum of the fundamental values, sentiments and knowledge that give form and substance to political process.” (Pye)
To inspect this definition in greater detail, political culture would refer to the combination of the different principles and standards of the people (values), their attitudes; that are mainly based on emotion rather than reason towards the government (sentiments) and also their familiarity, awareness or even understanding (knowledge) gained through learning, of the political process. Therefore, the political culture consists of values, sentiments and knowledge of the public. However, how are we supposed to Ðmeasure