Miranda Warning – Research Paper – Keisha Perez
Search
Essays
Sign up
Sign in
Contact us
Tweet
Index
/American History
Miranda Warning
Miranda WarningKeisha Perez17 July 2017Mr Pinkney Miranda is a ruling which says that the charged have the privilege to stay quiet and prosecutors may not use statements made by them while in police custody, unless the police advise them of their rights (Rogers, R., Harrison, K. S., Shuman, D. W., Sewell, K. W., & Hazelwood, L. L., 2007). At the end of the day, a cop must inform a suspect of their fundamental right, under the Fifth Amendment, at the time of their arrest or potentially their interrogation. Miranda protects ignorant suspects from implicating themselves. Miranda additionally shields suspects from overzealous cops. Although most law-enforcement officers in the United States are better than average men and women, some abuse their power (Rogers, R., Harrison, K. S., Shuman, D. W., Sewell, K. W., & Hazelwood, L. L., 2007). They may attempt to force suspects into giving false confessions. On numerous occasions, we read of situations where suspects were compelled to make confessions in light of the fact that an overeager or biased cops need to close a case (Alexander, P., Medalie, R.J., & Zeitz, L., 1968). The Miranda Warning helps hold abused laws in check. On the off chance that the law is used effectively, the guilty would get their due punishment. At the point when cops inform suspects of their rights before interrogation, it is impossible that the judge managing any case would toss out statements made during questioning. As indicated by Chief Justice Earl Warren, “The accused who does not know his rights and therefore does not make a request might be the individual who most needs counsel” (Rogers, R., Harrison, K. S., Shuman, D. W., Sewell, K. W., & Hazelwood, L. L., 2007). There are pros to the Miranda Rights for both the defendant and for the cops included. One of the pros to this right is for the defendant. In the event that the police dont read the defendant their rights at the time of arrest, any evidence that the police get could be tossed out of court. A major defense for the defendant is that they can be made aware that they dont need to confess to anything without having an attorney present ((Alexander, P., Medalie, R.J., & Zeitz, L., 1968). In the event that the defendant is a minor, he/she needs to have a parent or a lawyer with them during any sort of interrogation. The only pro for the police is that in the event that they read the rights to the suspect they have a great possibility of keeping the criminal off the streets. This serves as a check-and-balance system for any cops involved in the case. The police dont need to Mirandize you until the point when you are arrested. There isnt a law out there that states a cop needs to read your rights when he approaches you. The police also dont need to reveal to you the crime you have committed. Now if the police dont read your rights until after you have confessed most times your confession will be tossed out, unless the defendant admits to a crime before the police read him his rights, that confession can be used in court (Alexander, P., Medalie, R.J., & Zeitz, L., 1968). The police dont need to read you your rights as long as you are a witness and not the criminal. There are two ways to prove to the court that the suspect has waived their individual rights. A waiver is a willful and deliberate surrender of a known right. Waiver can be explicit (express waiver) or verifiable (implied waiver) (Kassin, S. M., & Norwick, R. J., 2004). An express waiver requires a composition or an announcement of waiver. An implied waiver can happen just by some activity, where such activity shows ones goal to postpone the rights. One statement must be recorded in the report that the cop’s reviews and the other one must be composed in the suspects own writing (Kassin, S. M., & Norwick, R. J., 2004).
Continue for 3 more pages »
Read full document
Download as (for upgraded members)
Citation Generator
MLA 7
CHICAGO
(2017, 07). Miranda Warning. EssaysForStudent.com. Retrieved 07, 2017, from
“Miranda Warning” EssaysForStudent.com. 07 2017. 2017. 07 2017 <
"Miranda Warning." EssaysForStudent.com. EssaysForStudent.com, 07 2017. Web. 07 2017. <
"Miranda Warning." EssaysForStudent.com. 07, 2017. Accessed 07, 2017.
Essay Preview
By: Keisha Perez
Submitted: July 31, 2017
Essay Length: 999 Words / 4 Pages
Paper type: Research Paper Views: 455
Report this essay
Tweet
Related Essays
Warning : 25th Hour Speech
This is for people who needed it and couldn't find it anywhere, I was one of themEnjoy it and BE WARNED - ITS EXPLICIT! Fuck
687 Words | 3 Pages
Miranda Rights
Miranda Rights Everyone has heard the term Miranda Rights, whether that be when taking a law class, during the course of a television show, or
1,569 Words | 7 Pages
Muddy River Flood Warning Action Procedures
Muddy River Flood Warning Action Procedures NU Facilities Costumer Service Center Overview In 1996 the Muddy River overflowed its banks and caused over 100 million
671 Words | 3 Pages
What Is the Miranda Warning?
Miranda Warning 2 The Miranda Warning Introduction For even the most casual viewer of police television shows, the cry of "read me my rights" has
604 Words | 3 Pages
Get Access to 89,000+ Essays and Term Papers
Join 209,000+ Other Students
High Quality Essays and Documents
Sign up
© 2008–2020 EssaysForStudent.comFree Essays, Book Reports, Term Papers and Research Papers
Essays
Sign up
Sign in
Contact us
Site Map
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Facebook
Twitter