How Does Brueggemann (in His Orientation-Disorientation-New Orientation) Build Bridges Between Form Criticism of the Psalms, Theology and Spirituality?
Essay Preview: How Does Brueggemann (in His Orientation-Disorientation-New Orientation) Build Bridges Between Form Criticism of the Psalms, Theology and Spirituality?
Report this essay
INTRODUCTION
Form Criticism of the Psalms has been around for less than a hundred years. Prior to 1920s study use of the Psalms was pretty much limited to a historical-critical approach and a Christological approach. That is – the establishing of who wrote what and why and the reading of psalms within the context of Christ, respectively. To fully appreciate how Brueggemann builds these bridges between form criticism, theology and spirituality we will first look at a basic understanding of the foundations of form criticism onto which Brueggemann offered his new schema. Secondly we shall look at Brueggemanns schema and how he builds and develops these bridges into theology and spirituality. Finally we shall be reflecting on Christian spirituality That is; we shall be reflecting on how this schema helps us in our engagement with secular spirituality with particular reference to the area of urban hip-hop and new punk. I am basing my understanding and framework of spirituality on the work of Bob Mayo in his work Making Sense of Generation Y (2006). In it he proposes that spirituality can be understood in two ways – Formative spirituality; that is a level of spiritual understanding and awareness that everyone is born with and everyone has. And secondly transformative spirituality; that is a level of spiritual understanding and awareness that builds on formative spirituality into having a personal and communal outworking.
And so in answering How does Brueggemann build bridges between form criticism of the Psalms, theology and spirituality? I shall be addressing spirituality in a Christian transformative understanding and from a secular formative spirituality understanding.
THE DEVELOPMENT OF FORM CRITICISM
As stated earlier it wasnt until the 1920s and the work of Hermann Gunkel, and his student Sigmund Mowinkel, that form criticism really started. Gunkel and Mowinkel observed that the Psalms only really had a very limited framework of approaches and styles – The Hymn, Communal Lament, Individual Lament, Royal Psalms and Individual Thanksgiving. Further work identified five further, less common categories of Psalm – Communal Thanksgiving, Wisdom, Pilgrimage, Entrance Liturgies and finally Mixed Poems . According to Gunkel in classifying the Psalms and putting them into the separate groupings three conditions had to be met;
The psalms had to have a similar setting or basis in worship
The psalms had to have similar feelings or sentiments running through them
The psalms had to have a similar structure
It was through using these conditions that he came up with his five main categories and subsequent five lesser categories. Since these categories have been set down most form criticism of the psalms have pretty much followed this framework. It is into this arena that Brueggemann proposed his schema of orientation, disorientation and new-orientation.
BRUEGGEMANNS SCHEMA
Brueggemann suggests that all the Psalms can be roughly grouped around three general themes of orientation, disorientation and new-orientation. He proposes this not as a solid unyielding framework but as a way of helping us;
“see things we might not have seen otherwise.”
Within the Psalms of orientation we find an expression of confidence in a creator God that consistently maintains life and provides for his people.
“One generation shall laud your works to another, and shall declare your mighty acts. On the glorious splendour of your majesty, and on your wondrous works, I will meditate.”
Brueggemann does not see these Psalms as the most interesting because of their lack of tension and movement in their feeling and construction. Parallels with Westermanns mode of classification are clear at this point with what he calls descriptive hymns.
“The function of such description is the continued reaffirmation and reconstruction of this good world. Thus songs of creation, wisdom, retribution and blessings, all function in the same context of good order and well being.”
Within disorientation we find a lot more realistic reflection of what day to day life is really like, both in an individual capacity and a communal capacity. Within the Psalms of disorientation there is a place where we, as a people of God, are honest about how we feel about current situations. Within this honesty there is an ode to what things used to be like. Within Psalm 42 we find a real song of disorientation that has within it a remembrance of things past, or a time of orientation?
“These things I remember, as I pour out my soul: how I went with the throng, and led them in procession to the House of God.”
Finally we move from orientation and the thanking of our Creator God into a period of us feeling loss and abandonment into a time of new orientation. That is;
“The Psalms regularly bear witness to the surprising gift of new life just when none had been expected.”
The expression and gift new life and hope comes as such a surprise and shock that the community or individual can be left with no doubt that these blessings came from God.
“Though I walk in the midst of trouble, you preserve me against the wrath of my enemies; you stretch out your hand, and your right hand delivers me.”
BRUEGGEMANNS BRIDGES
There are four main bridges that I shall look at that Brueggemann builds between form criticism of the Psalms , theology and spirituality;
The life of Christ
Within the liturgical context of baptism
Within the dynamic of human existence
Subversion of the dominant culture
I shall deal with each of these areas in turn.
1. THE LIFE OF CHRIST
Within the three major events in Jesus life we find the first bridge in the schema; His birth, His death and His resurrection.
Orientation clearly links with Christs birth
“And suddenly there was with the angel