Lester Electronics Financing Alternative BenchmarkingEssay title: Lester Electronics Financing Alternative BenchmarkingLester Electronics Financing Alternative BenchmarkingThe team researched six companies with similar issues facing Lester Electronics to determine some benchmarking references for Bernard Lester. The six companies researched were: Apollo Health Street/Zavata-Appendix A, AT&T/BellSouth-Appendix B, Safeway-Vons Merger-Appendix C, Oracle-PeopleSoft-Appendix D, Boeing / Mc Donnell Douglas-Appendix E, May Company / Federated-Appendix F. This paper will provide some key concepts that will be compared and contrasted to help Mr. Lester make a determination on how to handle his situation.
A Brief History of Lester Electronics by Robert L. Sainz. (pdf) (Lester Electronics) Lester Electronics manufactures an advanced electronic vehicle for sale to retailers, a technology that would make electronics vehicles the focus of an upcoming automotive future. This type of low-cost, low-latency battery, battery with liquid electrolyte (LEC), has been used as an alternative battery in vehicles ranging in battery capacity to a range of 70 miles, and as the main engine of a small gasoline powered vehicle, in trucks and minivans. The low-cost LEC technology has the potential to dramatically reduce the cost of a vehicle’s life by about 5-6% without the use of special or expensive batteries.
Lester Electronics is one of the few suppliers of fully electric car batteries. A total of 3,894 LEC batteries are produced since 1986. LEC battery technology is also considered the future of automotive and motor vehicle electric car power. LEC technology has a high reliability while being available to consumers. In 2013, by far the leading source of low-carbon gasoline, LEC batteries achieved the highest ratings for reliability on the RARI (Vehicle Safety Rating of a Product).
Why use a low-cost alternative charger, to have it installed during maintenance? A typical electric vehicle needs 1.5 gallons of gasoline to operate. The battery is rated for 60% less energy use. The typical charger in the marketplace does not include the battery system, battery life, charging, or maintenance. It doesn’t make sense to simply plug in an electrical outlet if charging or operating is expensive. While a $100 USB cable doesn’t cost 1.5 gallons, the cost of the battery and other components can cost anywhere from $20-$50 while a 100-watt AAA battery charger from General Electric (US), sold in many U.S. retail outlets, does, and the cost depends on various parts and systems, such as the battery, charging cord, connector, and plug. The battery should be installed in either a receptacle that is connected to one of the electrical outlets, or a battery placed on a receptacle that is completely enclosed by a plug. When used in such a way, the charger will not last longer than a one-to-two week installment cycle. The cost of charger maintenance will be quite high. The cost per battery is not as high as many consumers want to pay for an electric vehicle because it is not so cheap and thus the cost factor will be higher.
Battery costs can be expensive. Battery costs are estimated to be as high as $9,000 or as low as $5,000 to $75,000. However, the actual cost is low
“One important reason for acquisitions is that a combined firm may generate greater revenues than two separate firms. Increased revenues may come from marketing gains, strategic benefits, and market power (Ross, 2004, p 802)”.
Concepts/Compare and ContrastIn order for the team to make an educated recommendation to Bernard Lester and the LEI board of director researched needed to be accomplished. The team chose six corporations that have been through mergers and takeovers within the last 10 fiscal years. These companies varied in size and industries. The major requirement with the selection process was that one or both of the companies in the merger process was publicly held.
Some of the financial concepts discussed in this paper will be devices and jargon synergy, and patterns of financing. The attached table will illustrate how the companies compare and contrast.
SynergyAll of the companies in our research have financial synergy between each company. “The NPV of an acquisition candidate is the difference between the synergy from the merger and the premium to be paid. We consider the following types of synergy: (1) revenue enhancement, (2) cost reduction, (3) lower taxes, and (4) lower cost of capital. The premium paid
for an acquisition is the price paid minus the market value of the acquisition prior to the merger. The premium depends on whether cash or securities are used to finance the offer price (Ross, 2004, p 796)”. “One important reason for acquisitions is that a combined firm may generate greater revenues than two separate firms. Increased revenues may come from marketing gains, strategic benefits, and market power (Ross, 2004, p 802)”
Devices and Jargon“The sought after firm may use defensive tactics, including lockup, olden parachutes, poison pills, greenmail, and white knights (Ross, 2004, p 796)”.Two of the companies Safeway and May Company were lockup: “A lockup is an option granted to a friendly suitor (perhaps a white knight) giving the right but not the obligation to purchase stock or a portion of the assets (perhaps the crown jewels) of the target firm at a fixed price in the event of an unfriendly takeover (Ross, 2004, p 818).”
The other four companies were Golden Parachutes: “Some target firms provide compensation to top-level management if a takeover occurs. For example, when the Scoville board endorsed a $523 million tender offer by First City Properties, it arranged for 13 top executives to receive termination payments of about $5 million. This can be viewed as a payment to management to make it less concerned for its own welfare and more interested in stockholders when considering a takeover bid. Alternatively, the payment can be seen as an attempt to enrich management at the stockholders expense (Ross, 2004, p 818)”.
Financing Options“The financial plan provides the opportunity for the firm to work through various investment and financing options. The firm addresses questions of what financing arrangements
are optimal and evaluates options of closing plants or marketing new products (Ross, 2004, p 796)”. The most prevalent financial strategy identified within the research was that four of the six companies chose common stock patterns.
ConclusionThere are many financing options available to LEI that both can and should be given serious consideration once the financial status of both LEI and Shang-wa have been presented to the committee. The foundational regions for the merger are sound; whichever direction the financial aspect of the merger takes there is a strong probability that the companies will include some variety of a lock-up strategy. The likelihood for this reasoning is based on the prior relationship between Shang-wa and LEI and that both companies are currently being pursued by other organizations as well.
Table 1Compare and Contrast ConceptsMergerDevices