Lightrail Is a Good IdeaEssay title: Lightrail Is a Good IdeaThe installation of a light rail transit system in Austin would be a step in the direction of progress for Austins traffic problem. Austins present traffic situation is atrocious. There seems to be no real plan on how it will be fixed and paid for. The Capital Metro buses are the only form of mass transit in Austin. The buses run for college students and go around campus and off campus. The buses that only travel on campus never have a very high ridership, where as the buses that go off campus always tend to be overfull. This is where light rail comes in.
Light rail is a term that come into being only in the last thirty or forty years. It refers to an electric railway system, constructed in the 1970s or later, characterized by its ability to operate single or multiple car consists, trains. It travels along exclusive rights-of-way track at ground level, on aerial structures, in subways, or in streets. It can board and discharge passengers at station platforms or at street, track, or car-floor level. Light rail can also refer to an electric railway with a “light volume” traffic capacity, as opposed to heavy rail. Light rail may use shared or exclusive rights-of-way, high or low platform loading and multi-car trains or single cars. Also known as “streetcar,” “trolley car” or “tramway.”
Opponents of Austins proposed light rail system usually say that a better solution to Austins traffic problem is to add more lanes to the highways and add more miles of road. They also say that the city needs to maintain the current streets better. Houston is a good example of what good roads can do to help traffic problems. Houston Metro, Houstons transit agency, spent $700 million on 88 miles of carpool lanes in Houston. Carpool lanes, or high occupancy vehicle(HOV) lanes, are lanes that are separated from the main highway by barriers and require that a vehicle be carrying at least two people to use them. The extra HOV lanes have reduced Houstons overall traffic congestion by six percent. In Katy, southwest Houston, the HOV lanes have reduced congestion by 14 percent.
Houston has done a good job with improving their highways, but there are some downsides. Even though the HOV lanes have helped to reduce traffic congestion in most places by up to six percent, they are now carrying more people than designed for. The lanes were designed to carry somewhere between 1400 and 1500 vehicles per hour, but are now seeing upwards of 2000 to 3000 vehicles per hour. This has caused Houston metro to put a fee on the lanes. Any vehicle with two passengers must pay a fee, where as vehicles with three or more may ride for free. Last year Houston had an increase of 40 percent in the number of people who make daily trips on the highways. This increase of people can be perceived as a forewarning to the increase in the number of people that will use it this year. This combined with the problem of the overfull HOV lanes, and it is obvious that Houston will be back were they started only a decade ago. Also, if Austin did decided to chose more highway lanes and HOV lanes as a solution to the traffic problem, it could take up to twelve years before there would be any extra lanes.
It can be argued that of the problems that come along with more highways may not happen. One problem that is guaranteed to happen is more people are going to start driving. With this increased driving also comes more pollution. Houston may have the most impressive HOV lane system in America, but they are also fighting for the number two position as the most air polluted city in the country, with Los Angeles as number one. A study done by California has found that for every time a city doubles its road miles, it will see a 30 to 70 percent increase in drivers making daily trips on the highways within as little as five years. On a side note, Austin has more road miles per person than any other major Texas city. And we have been building more roads for years, and it really isnt helping much.
Hollywood.com reports that if you went to a major film studio in Hollywood, you would see four to six weeks of nighttime traffic. That was more than the typical 10,000 to 20,000 hours a day in the city between October 16 and October 21, the period of record-breaking pollution on a weekly basis when record-setting levels of exposure were expected. As part of these data-mining, studios took a year of data from more than 6,000 different sources, as well as city and other data sets from the Environmental Protection Agency, to create an interactive map that allows for the location and traffic of their projects, their residents, and the public to know that what they do on the big screen is much, much more important than what they look like in front of their eyes. That’s a huge issue, and they want to understand how the industry might improve on that. They do.
The film industry needs to take the lead, and that has to come from a real commitment to public health, education, and quality, said Robert A. Dolan, a longtime researcher, director, chair and director of the Institute for Global Society, in a recent conversation. “We do the same thing in cities where there is so much corruption on highways, in the drug dealing culture,” he said. “This is one of the reasons for where we sit in the development of roads. Every one of our roads and every one of our roads should be cleaned up and tested for the dangers of driving without a safety belt. And there shouldn’t be this kind of cycle of pollution.” It shouldn’t be all pollution. That is a core idea; just don’t go all the way.
But you do have to think about what might make us think differently. Not that any of it is true. Take a look at the news reports about the effects of air pollution. There were two major public health health efforts undertaken at Ford, one in the late 1990s and the other after the passage of the Clean Air Act in 2002, which were funded by private foundations. The second was funded by the EPA. The EPA is run by the same staff that designed the air rules for the city of Santa Monica, Calif. The only difference came with the Clean Power Plan, a big part of which was created by Mayor Michael Bloomberg. In essence, it was an attempt to address the pollution problem.
In Los Angeles, for example, there are about 10 million cars in the city that don’t have the protections as the EPA says. Even Mayor Lee wants to limit the pollution on the 405. “I don’t think he’s going to be sitting down and saying, ‘Get out,’ or say, ‘I know what I’m doing, and I know how to help,'” said Bruce Anderson, a senior vice president with the city (see: Clean Energy Council, 2015). “I’m not going to sit down and say, ‘Yeah, it’s true.’ I am going to be talking about it and trying to make sense of it, looking at the evidence and finding the best way to fix it. He needs to look at how we
The use of light rail would guarantee the increase in air pollution would not happen. The light rail trains use overhanging power lines for the electricity to run, meaning they make no pollution. A single consist of three trains could carry 450 passengers, if each of these people took another rider with them in a car on the highway, that would mean 225 more cars on the highway. This shows just how many cars the system could take from the highways. Remember this is