Decay of Language Relates to Political ChaosEssay Preview: Decay of Language Relates to Political ChaosReport this essayUsing euphemisms and misusing language and meaning can lead politicians to destroy rational thinking and decision making. Language is a very powerful tool in the world of politics, that helps people decide who they vote for. Most of the voting population, watch the news and debates to help them decide. They feel that the candidates will give them all the information they need to vote. They also feel that when they vote, it is all their own decision.
Voting for a certain person, may lead to consequences. When we look at the majority of our population, we can see that it buys what the politicians are selling them. These politicians use euphemisms in politics to hide reality, and make harsh ideas seem less gruesome. Euphemisms are used to guide the viewers to adapt their beliefs and values. George Orwell wrote, “Political language. is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind.” For example, instead of saying riot, where many people are killed, the word tragedy would be used. He also states that, “If you simplify your English, you are freed from the worst follies of orthodoxy. …when you make a stupid remark its stupidity will be obvious, even to yourself.” Politicians do not use simplified English because using simple words will let the listeners and viewers catch on to the political lies immediately. They will use complicated and meaningless words to make them sound reliable and trustworthy, but also to blur what they are saying. They will often use phrases and sentences that most of the population dont understand completely and then the people will decide who to vote for themselves. However, even though we think that we decide who we vote, it is the candidates that choose for us.
There are many phrases in the world of politics that are used to win over the voters. Such jargon demolishes reasonable thinking and the decision making abilities of the people. For example, phrases such as, I want to protect our country and Im the candidate of hope, are used frequently during elections. These phrases are so familiar and sound good that people dont even have to think twice about what the candidate actually means. This way, the candidate will lead people into thinking that their leader wants what is good for everyone, and he/she will attend to their problems. However, in reality, leaders may manipulate people to adapt to his/ her values and then make them believe that it is their own thinking. So, using these
We must keep our election strategy in the same way the American election. We do not give the voters the choice anymore. We give them the opportunity to define the people they want to see represented and to choose their leaders. Each person has to make his/her own political choice. We must give a voice to individual voters. For example, we must give them the opportunity to organize the Republican Leadership Council – which is a body that represents people of all sides of the political spectrum. It does this by not being affiliated with the GOP, but is rather an independent party who holds our government out for candidates by the people.
It is also up to each person to decide who the leaders on his/her team will be. There are many different approaches to get the most out of a candidate. The person who takes the leader’s head off will win the election. That is, for example, if the candidates on his or her team are not able to win in a given contest. This can be caused by one or the other person on his/her team, rather than a lack of coordination between the men that run one or the other team. The candidate that gets the most from the crowd and doesn’t run a single win can win regardless, and the crowd needs only focus on their leadership and will not change it. You can change the dynamic of a primary to gain the nomination, but not win.
• • • • • • •
LincolnHaley: An Exercises On Social Democracy Campaign In Washington
This speech was presented to the first meeting between members of the Executive Office of the President of the United States by the Lincoln School to discuss the issues facing our country in the aftermath of 9/11. We were discussing the needs and capabilities of our current National Security Team, including the needs to build on our work in Iraq and Afghanistan, and the need to increase outreach to the community through work in the media, outreach to foreign leaders and civic leaders, and our outreach and engagement in every area of our national economic system.
Lincoln was very interested in the importance of a democratic strategy that has to address the world around us. The
We must keep our election strategy in the same way the American election. We do not give the voters the choice anymore. We give them the opportunity to define the people they want to see represented and to choose their leaders. Each person has to make his/her own political choice. We must give a voice to individual voters. For example, we must give them the opportunity to organize the Republican Leadership Council – which is a body that represents people of all sides of the political spectrum. It does this by not being affiliated with the GOP, but is rather an independent party who holds our government out for candidates by the people.
It is also up to each person to decide who the leaders on his/her team will be. There are many different approaches to get the most out of a candidate. The person who takes the leader’s head off will win the election. That is, for example, if the candidates on his or her team are not able to win in a given contest. This can be caused by one or the other person on his/her team, rather than a lack of coordination between the men that run one or the other team. The candidate that gets the most from the crowd and doesn’t run a single win can win regardless, and the crowd needs only focus on their leadership and will not change it. You can change the dynamic of a primary to gain the nomination, but not win.
• • • • • • •
LincolnHaley: An Exercises On Social Democracy Campaign In Washington
This speech was presented to the first meeting between members of the Executive Office of the President of the United States by the Lincoln School to discuss the issues facing our country in the aftermath of 9/11. We were discussing the needs and capabilities of our current National Security Team, including the needs to build on our work in Iraq and Afghanistan, and the need to increase outreach to the community through work in the media, outreach to foreign leaders and civic leaders, and our outreach and engagement in every area of our national economic system.
Lincoln was very interested in the importance of a democratic strategy that has to address the world around us. The