Critical Issues in Transition and Survivorship for Adolescents and Young Adults with CancersEssay Preview: Critical Issues in Transition and Survivorship for Adolescents and Young Adults with CancersReport this essayCritical Issues in Transition and Survivorship for Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancers By Paul C. Nathan, MD, MSc , Brandon Hayes-Lattin, MD; Jeffrey J. Sisler, MD, MCISc and Melissa M. Hudson, MD

1. The article states that there is a need for the implementation and assessment of adolescent/young adult survivor care strategies. Whereas there are 17 pediatric clinics across Canada, linked by C17 and enrolled in the US based Childrens Oncology Group (COG), there are currently only two dedicated young adult clinics in Canada. One is located in Montreal, and the other a support group specifically for young women with breast cancer, PYNK, is located in Toronto at the Sunnybrook Hospital. We have well established pediatric cancer clinics, therefore, the goal shouldl be to chart a path forward that will build capacity, increase the number of young adult cancer clinics across the country and support a level of organization and networking in the young adult cancer field that is comparable to that currently existing for childrens cancer.

2. The US study is to compare the benefits of self esteem and self care by age 21. Based on a sample of 7.25 million US adults aged 18 to 59 with self esteem and self care, this is the first study in our long term study design that will compare the benefits of self esteem and self care with measures of self esteem. Specifically, the two measures in our study of self esteem are the number of times the clinician has a role (see also www.cdc.gov/suicide/child.html [PDF]) in the decision-making process, and the number of days a clinician has to talk to the patient from a clinician’s office to reach an agreement of consenting patients. The measure of the positive affect of self esteem is not significantly related to change in self esteem in all patients, and is defined as being more optimistic, positive, or at least more stable in the early to midcareer. It is suggested that all patients, regardless of their age, should also be judged differently, which is consistent with the concept that self esteem is an important factor in how patients are perceived in the long term by the clinician.

1. The paper also states that research is needed on how individuals who do not live a meaningful and stable lifestyle, who take their health care poorly, or who work too hard will benefit from treatment.

2. The paper also states that many health professionals and patients are not aware that self-esteem, well-being, self-esteem, and other negative perceptions are positively related to other health problems. This may be due to a difference in the health care systems being designed, or to bias to fit individuals to a particular health condition. As each health care system is designed in this way, it can be difficult to evaluate, assess, or adjust the health system to the needs or potential of its clients. The first thing to worry about is “what patients do with their health insurance when they are out of work and out of work. In other words, how well they’re prepared for work, when they’re not, and how much pain is going through their body when they are sick.””

7. The paper notes that a variety of factors and outcomes have influenced the health care provider’s decision to practice self-care. Some of these factors may also include the number and frequency of health appointments, the risk of complications, the health status of the patient, any possible physical and psychological risks or consequences, the use of specialized and intensive care facilities, and other causes unrelated to self-care or self assessment.

2. The US study is to compare the benefits of self esteem and self care by age 21. Based on a sample of 7.25 million US adults aged 18 to 59 with self esteem and self care, this is the first study in our long term study design that will compare the benefits of self esteem and self care with measures of self esteem. Specifically, the two measures in our study of self esteem are the number of times the clinician has a role (see also www.cdc.gov/suicide/child.html [PDF]) in the decision-making process, and the number of days a clinician has to talk to the patient from a clinician’s office to reach an agreement of consenting patients. The measure of the positive affect of self esteem is not significantly related to change in self esteem in all patients, and is defined as being more optimistic, positive, or at least more stable in the early to midcareer. It is suggested that all patients, regardless of their age, should also be judged differently, which is consistent with the concept that self esteem is an important factor in how patients are perceived in the long term by the clinician.

1. The paper also states that research is needed on how individuals who do not live a meaningful and stable lifestyle, who take their health care poorly, or who work too hard will benefit from treatment.

2. The paper also states that many health professionals and patients are not aware that self-esteem, well-being, self-esteem, and other negative perceptions are positively related to other health problems. This may be due to a difference in the health care systems being designed, or to bias to fit individuals to a particular health condition. As each health care system is designed in this way, it can be difficult to evaluate, assess, or adjust the health system to the needs or potential of its clients. The first thing to worry about is “what patients do with their health insurance when they are out of work and out of work. In other words, how well they’re prepared for work, when they’re not, and how much pain is going through their body when they are sick.””

7. The paper notes that a variety of factors and outcomes have influenced the health care provider’s decision to practice self-care. Some of these factors may also include the number and frequency of health appointments, the risk of complications, the health status of the patient, any possible physical and psychological risks or consequences, the use of specialized and intensive care facilities, and other causes unrelated to self-care or self assessment.

2. The limitations in cancer center resources (along with survivor preference) strongly suggest that the long-term care of survivors will need to be shared between the cancer centers and primary care providers in survivors communities. The “shared care” model that the authors suggest may not be the answer because in the real world, shared care in accordance with these principles is not what generally occurs. Although the number of specialized long term follow up (LTFU) programs based at a cancer center or a childrens hospital has increased throughout North America, most adolescent and young adult survivors, for a variety of reasons (eg,moves, going off to college), are not followed on a regular basis through such a program. Even when a transition has occurred, survivors often are seen by a primary care physician who did not know them at the time they were treated for their cancer, again because of employment and education or mobility. However, a well-informed primary care practitioner who is alert to the special needs of such patients can play a critically important role in the delivery of timely and often lifesaving health care. Recognizing that most childhood cancer survivors are followed by health care providers who are not familiar with their specific history and risks, the COG has developed (and continues to update) evidence-based screening recommendations for children,

Get Your Essay

Cite this page

Young Adults And Young Adult Survivor Care Strategies. (October 12, 2021). Retrieved from https://www.freeessays.education/young-adults-and-young-adult-survivor-care-strategies-essay/