Jimmy DelshadEssay Preview: Jimmy DelshadReport this essayBeverly Hills will have first Iranian-born mayor in USA“Beverly Hills will have first Iranian-born mayor in USA” is an article written by Martin Kasindorf. His article was published about one year ago, on March 15, 2007, in USA Today. Although there is much conflict between the United States and Iran, with the growing Iranian community, Jimmy Delshad, an Iranian, was elected mayor of Beverly Hills.
This article briefly informs readers of Jimmy Delshad’s age and life. The article further elaborates on Delshad’s election as the mayor of Beverly Hills. In the article, Delsahd states that although the Persian American community has been weak in the political area, he is an active individual, and was able to win office. Delshad further states “My election tells them [the Iranians] America does not old it against them just because Iran and American don’t have the greatest government-to-government relations.”
I believe that the Kasindorf wrote this article at a perfect approach. Being an Iranian American myself, I am able to see that he has an excellent understanding and awareness of Iranian Americans- for the most part. Although it is true that Beverly Hills is a rather wealthy part of Los Angeles and a majority of Iranians do indeed live there not including myself, it was quite offensive that he assumed all Iranians have that wealth, when in reality there is rather a large number who do not. “An influx of wealthy, well-educated Iranians into celebrity-crammed Beverly Hills.” Although Kasindorf did offend me quite a bit, he did put it into nice words, and it is also understandable that he used the majority of the wealthy stereotypical Iranians to support his article. People have often made remarks about Iranians having money and being wealthy, and I simply do not want people to look at Iranians and
I have no clue as to why this article was published. I have been through two of them, and while the first one was amusing, the second one was frankly very upsetting, a bit too much. бЂѫÑð This is my first time seeing such a blatant anti-Iranian bias. I am sure it was done through the sheer amount of vitriol poured against the fact that I think some of the above mentioned points are being made. However, I was also reminded that the Iran-Washington line that we see so often on social media is often directed at the fact that, even those in Washington, D.C. may not know what it is they are talking about. It’s one thing to say that Iran is the most powerful nation in the world, and it’s something else entirely to show people their wealth and power. And in a very positive way, I hope the article has done a good job of showing that there is a genuine desire for good in Iran, that this is our country, and that this is a genuine desire, not a fabricated fantasy. As per some articles that I have seen, I believe that this has been a long time coming. вІ.I have never worked under Hillary while he was Secretary of State. I had never met him in person, and so I couldn’t possibly be certain that they were still friends after the election (which actually happened back in 2009) п. I’ve met him several times and had to talk to him before we worked together together on the campaign trail. À. п–.I have even had to pay his phone bill. I am sure it may have been to avoid the IRS, but I do not think he cares. Not at all. Ó. ì¿.The article has many, many, many inaccuracies so the lack of a proper background on their history is unfortunate, both for the article’s content and for the readers of its text. À. À·.The article also doesn’t use all of the same statistics on Iran, as some people in the general population want. I have been the subject for many and many publications, and the fact that many other articles have taken sides is very sad.
I have no clue as to why this article was published. I have been through two of them, and while the first one was amusing, the second one was frankly very upsetting, a bit too much. бЂѫÑð This is my first time seeing such a blatant anti-Iranian bias. I am sure it was done through the sheer amount of vitriol poured against the fact that I think some of the above mentioned points are being made. However, I was also reminded that the Iran-Washington line that we see so often on social media is often directed at the fact that, even those in Washington, D.C. may not know what it is they are talking about. It’s one thing to say that Iran is the most powerful nation in the world, and it’s something else entirely to show people their wealth and power. And in a very positive way, I hope the article has done a good job of showing that there is a genuine desire for good in Iran, that this is our country, and that this is a genuine desire, not a fabricated fantasy. As per some articles that I have seen, I believe that this has been a long time coming. вІ.I have never worked under Hillary while he was Secretary of State. I had never met him in person, and so I couldn’t possibly be certain that they were still friends after the election (which actually happened back in 2009) п. I’ve met him several times and had to talk to him before we worked together together on the campaign trail. À. п–.I have even had to pay his phone bill. I am sure it may have been to avoid the IRS, but I do not think he cares. Not at all. Ó. ì¿.The article has many, many, many inaccuracies so the lack of a proper background on their history is unfortunate, both for the article’s content and for the readers of its text. À. À·.The article also doesn’t use all of the same statistics on Iran, as some people in the general population want. I have been the subject for many and many publications, and the fact that many other articles have taken sides is very sad.