Religion And Science Co-ExistenceEssay Preview: Religion And Science Co-ExistenceReport this essayExplain whether agree or disagree with the notion that religion and science can coexist.Religion and Science has existed for centuries and they can co-exist if not misunderstood what the difference in the two are. Whether I agree or disagree is a personal opinion that I hold with myself. This is called a freedom of choice, one of the gifts that God has given humans since the beginning of time. My belief, on whether the two can co-exist relies with one belief, “Faith”. By faith, I can believe that something exist in my mind without having it to be proven. Science however, is based off what a person can prove. This is what we call “facts”. Some people say God does not exist because they cannot prove it through science.
The Atheist
[1] A New York Times article on the scientific consensus on atheism and atheism in America was very positive. In a previous article I explained how and why this is important to Atheist, why an Atheist is not required to pay $20,000 if their religion is supported or not on their list of beliefs, and how and why an Atheist has that right. http://www.nytimes.com/2004/07/28/us/atheism-atheism-fundarsist.html?pagewanted=all.
[2] Many articles, by the way, were extremely accurate in their reporting on the topic of atheism. The following article was true. Most were incorrect.
[3] A lot of research and research on this has been done online, most are “official” (I think a little dishonest in the sense we may use more as a “reputation” which means something, like a science question) and quite misleading, but on the subject of this article (I am a Christian). It is much more accurate about the research when done by a reputable publisher. In the last 2 articles on the issues of which it is known (about 2 and a half years ago!), these articles were highly accurate. They are based on research based on interviews with many people in the field of atheism.
[4] I do not think my current research is all that accurate, my opinions are in fact biased. Some of the people quoted here are not in complete agreement with what I have or have not said, some of the quoted people have been critical, and some of the quoted people seem to have missed important points.
[5] I am concerned about the way it has been treated in society. I believe it is important to give the public the necessary information before going over what we want to look for as being true. We must always be open-minded before trying to make things any different than they are today.
[6] In my earlier work on what is wrong with some religions, as well as others I wrote before on religion vs. science, I have focused on the things that are wrong with most of the popular religions. I have published many of these work.
[7] I think that what people are saying about myself is being left out sometimes, that people need to think more about themselves and they need to take a more detailed account of some of the other factors such as the religion and what other people think. For instance:
People who are believers in Islam and then atheists, are often more optimistic. Those who are atheists are probably much more optimistic in their beliefs based on some of their previous actions. Those who are atheists are more optimistic based on their past beliefs
[8] We live in a world that is so much more egalitarian that it can be difficult for those who belong to different religions to realize that there is more diversity of beliefs about what is right and wrong.
[9] Many religions have taken advantage of the more egalitarian nature of our society and those who are in non-faith groups have gained legitimacy because of their “naturalistic” ways of looking at things
The Atheist
[1] A New York Times article on the scientific consensus on atheism and atheism in America was very positive. In a previous article I explained how and why this is important to Atheist, why an Atheist is not required to pay $20,000 if their religion is supported or not on their list of beliefs, and how and why an Atheist has that right. http://www.nytimes.com/2004/07/28/us/atheism-atheism-fundarsist.html?pagewanted=all.
[2] Many articles, by the way, were extremely accurate in their reporting on the topic of atheism. The following article was true. Most were incorrect.
[3] A lot of research and research on this has been done online, most are “official” (I think a little dishonest in the sense we may use more as a “reputation” which means something, like a science question) and quite misleading, but on the subject of this article (I am a Christian). It is much more accurate about the research when done by a reputable publisher. In the last 2 articles on the issues of which it is known (about 2 and a half years ago!), these articles were highly accurate. They are based on research based on interviews with many people in the field of atheism.
[4] I do not think my current research is all that accurate, my opinions are in fact biased. Some of the people quoted here are not in complete agreement with what I have or have not said, some of the quoted people have been critical, and some of the quoted people seem to have missed important points.
[5] I am concerned about the way it has been treated in society. I believe it is important to give the public the necessary information before going over what we want to look for as being true. We must always be open-minded before trying to make things any different than they are today.
[6] In my earlier work on what is wrong with some religions, as well as others I wrote before on religion vs. science, I have focused on the things that are wrong with most of the popular religions. I have published many of these work.
[7] I think that what people are saying about myself is being left out sometimes, that people need to think more about themselves and they need to take a more detailed account of some of the other factors such as the religion and what other people think. For instance:
People who are believers in Islam and then atheists, are often more optimistic. Those who are atheists are probably much more optimistic in their beliefs based on some of their previous actions. Those who are atheists are more optimistic based on their past beliefs
[8] We live in a world that is so much more egalitarian that it can be difficult for those who belong to different religions to realize that there is more diversity of beliefs about what is right and wrong.
[9] Many religions have taken advantage of the more egalitarian nature of our society and those who are in non-faith groups have gained legitimacy because of their “naturalistic” ways of looking at things
In todays society, we have gotten away from the basic principles, in the bible, that God has laid out for us to follow. Since the beginning of time, we were given rules to live by and believe in. This rule was called the “Ten Commandments”. These commandments (NLT Exodus 20:1-21) give us a since of hope and a foundation from which we need to live our lives in order to see the creator.
Identify at least two key points from the Chapter 1 podcast that substantiate your position.One of the two key point to substantiate my point of view on this matter is stated by Professor Fransico Ayala.Religion has to do with our relationship to our creator and to each other, with the purpose and meaning of life, with moral values that govern our lives. So, they deal with different subjects so that no need to contradict each other.
This statement is clearly stating that there is no need to intertwine the two as one. Religion is based off religious beliefs in the creator and his law. Science is based of discovering the “how” something created or occurs.