Corporal Punishment Research PaperEssay Preview: Corporal Punishment Research PaperReport this essayCorporal punishment Research PaperTewodros is 17 years old. He was very respectful and smart. After a while, he stated to be aggressive and started getting in trouble. Tewodros parents believed corporal punishment would change their son to become disciplined, but it wasnt working. Ever since he was getting punished he started to be more aggressive and abuse other. After six month he ended up in jail when he was 15 years old. If the parents tried to talk to him and helped him when he needed help, then this wouldnt happen at all. Tewodros is a good example of how corporal punishment is not effective in disciplining a child.
- Criminologists are now working on understanding the neural mechanisms governing how children judge a threat. They are now working on learning how to judge if a threat is truly not a serious one.
- In a future update this article has also been developed into a new article about the research and how it is carried out.
- A team from University College London conducted three studies about the neural mechanisms necessary for punishment. These studies showed that brainstem circuits in children who showed fear, such as their parents, tend to have an older neural network – one that is more sensitive to emotional cues. Thus, such children’s fear could be punished to their benefit.
- Researchers at Imperial College London used a model, called the ‘Brainstem-Neuron Network’, that had a 1,000-year history on brain and limb and showed that the young brains had a longer history of anxiety than the older brains. The new results showed that when the brainstem networks were different, when fear was more prevalent – for example, in a younger brain, or in a region of the cortex known for stress-relief – neural circuits also gave rise to more anxiety-inducing fear responses.
- In the brainstem, the cortex can be very short – it contains the areas of the brain involved in emotion detection. The fear neuron is linked to a subregion that is important in regulating emotions and emotions in the world. For example, our human fear threshold is very small when it is over two days. We therefore may need some warning over the long-term to avoid it happening.
- The corpus callosum (the area of the brain called the nucleus accumbens) contains some of the brain’s processing centers that are active during punishment. The first of those areas is the amygdala. In contrast, the amygdala is not a single thought process located on the brain, but actually has several functions. First, it produces and regulates anxiety responses across the cortex.
- The cortex is also involved in reward, as it responds to emotional state such as a smile, the touch, or to a threat. When the amygdala receives a warning it causes it to feel emotional arousal, or relax in response to the threat – this is called the fear of the unknown.
- The cortico-temporal part of the prefrontal cortex has been thought of as a central part of the brain responsible for fear perception. By using positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging techniques, Dr. Robert H. Neely, Ph.D., was able to find the prefrontal cortex itself. Specifically,
- Criminologists are now working on understanding the neural mechanisms governing how children judge a threat. They are now working on learning how to judge if a threat is truly not a serious one.
- In a future update this article has also been developed into a new article about the research and how it is carried out.
- A team from University College London conducted three studies about the neural mechanisms necessary for punishment. These studies showed that brainstem circuits in children who showed fear, such as their parents, tend to have an older neural network – one that is more sensitive to emotional cues. Thus, such children’s fear could be punished to their benefit.
- Researchers at Imperial College London used a model, called the ‘Brainstem-Neuron Network’, that had a 1,000-year history on brain and limb and showed that the young brains had a longer history of anxiety than the older brains. The new results showed that when the brainstem networks were different, when fear was more prevalent – for example, in a younger brain, or in a region of the cortex known for stress-relief – neural circuits also gave rise to more anxiety-inducing fear responses.
- In the brainstem, the cortex can be very short – it contains the areas of the brain involved in emotion detection. The fear neuron is linked to a subregion that is important in regulating emotions and emotions in the world. For example, our human fear threshold is very small when it is over two days. We therefore may need some warning over the long-term to avoid it happening.
- The corpus callosum (the area of the brain called the nucleus accumbens) contains some of the brain’s processing centers that are active during punishment. The first of those areas is the amygdala. In contrast, the amygdala is not a single thought process located on the brain, but actually has several functions. First, it produces and regulates anxiety responses across the cortex.
- The cortex is also involved in reward, as it responds to emotional state such as a smile, the touch, or to a threat. When the amygdala receives a warning it causes it to feel emotional arousal, or relax in response to the threat – this is called the fear of the unknown.
- The cortico-temporal part of the prefrontal cortex has been thought of as a central part of the brain responsible for fear perception. By using positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging techniques, Dr. Robert H. Neely, Ph.D., was able to find the prefrontal cortex itself. Specifically,
Corporal punishment is not effective to discipline a child, because children who are punished physically will end up becoming abusive and criminals in the future. “These young people are also more likely to abuse their children and spouses when they grow up” (Kerby.) As Kerby mentioned many children end up doing the same thing that was done to them. “Tulane University scientists looked 2,500 3-year-olds, waited 2 years , and controlled for other factors that might have influenced their behavior. The odds of a child being more aggressive at age 5 If he had been spanked more than twice in the month before the study began increased by 50%.” (Morris.) Many studies including the Tulane University indicate that many negative behaviors and outcomes have been commonly related with the parents using corporal punishment on their child.
Parents shouldnt use corporal punishment to discipline their children because it will hurt their children mentally. Many parents may think that when they punish their children physically it will change or discipline their children, but its not true many children will end up getting hurt mentally and physically. “It is claimed that corporal punishment has numerous adverse psychological effects, including depression, inhibition, rigidity, lowered self-esteem and heightened anxiety” (Benatar.) As Benatar mentioned there are many victims of corporal punishment that suffer from depression and a children that develop low self-esteem. “The results indicated all measures of psychopathology to be significantly related to exposure to both corporal punishment and ridicule” (Spencer.) In addition to Benatar idea spencer also added that corporal punishment affects children mentally and the results indicated all measures of psychopathology to be significantly related to exposure to both corporal punishment.
Parents shouldnt use corporal punishment to discipline their children because it will lead them to abusing their children. There are many cases when parents started in corporal punishment and they end up abusing their children. Parents will abuse their children as result of their children not changing their behaviors using corporal punishment. “The main problem