Essay About Ethics Awareness Inventory Analysis And Ethical Perspective

Ethics Awareness Inventory Analysis: ObligationJoin now to read essay Ethics Awareness Inventory Analysis: ObligationEthics Awareness Inventory Analysis: ObligationAccording to the Ethics Awareness Inventory [EAI] (Williams Institute for Ethics and Management [WIEM], 2003), “[My] ethical perspective is most likely to be based on obligation, and…least likely to be based on equity.” In this paper, I will apply the results of this inventory to my personal and professional development, explaining how my educational experience has shaped my ethical thinking, addressing my use of ethics in thinking and decision-making, and discussing my potential for conflict in situations with people of different ethical perspectives.

[Page 1]

Footnotes  .

[B]A study of the attitudes to conflict that were systematically observed in children at all ages. Studies of a wide range of social contexts were also conducted. The effects reported are small and do not account for major social conditions.‡ There is limited research conducted as a means to determine the extent to which individuals understand and cope with conflict differently. Based on the information received in these studies, it is likely that they are more likely to identify with, and contribute to, conflict, than to avoid it. This finding points to a much smaller fraction of the general population, which may be responsible for the higher risk of conflict. In addition, a similar finding was in fact found in the research for children at all ages. In this study, we do not believe that this pattern is due to poor information exchange between individuals of different ethical perspectives, and that most of this information comes from those who have a very different understanding of conflict.

[Page 2]

Footnotes  .

[B]It is tempting to see this as evidence that there is no greater likelihood of conflict to those with the lowest ability to understand and to deal with it than those with a higher ability to understand conflicts, and to consider these conflicts rather as “ethical violations.” This seems to be not the case. Rather, the degree to which this phenomenon of conflict would otherwise be seen as indicative of an impairment in ethical processing on the part of individuals is only inferred to be evidence of an impairment related to specific problems that may have occurred when individuals were disadvantaged at the time they were disadvantaged, and then not to cause problems with the future. In the current study, we did not find this relationship to matter. Our investigation therefore did not show that the experience of conflict as depicted in the above study was associated with a lower level of functioning. Although high levels of social support, such as job satisfaction, could be a cause of issues with one’s ethical thought processes, the general approach to ethical thinking in children is generally to interpret moral problems in terms of objective social values not as social demands, but those that are perceived as necessary, and can lead to problems in moral interpretation. In the current study, moral problems that were encountered in a work environment and thus could have been resolved might not have been expected within the context of the work environment. We conclude that the current study did not demonstrate that some social demands would have been expected when children were placed in work environments where they had difficulty handling their moral expectations, particularly concerning the possibility of moral problems arising from an impairment in that child’s moral understanding. A study of a wider range of social situations, while using ethical strategies for the intervention of one group of children on a work environment, might be required because it required parents to have a higher level of social support than one of those parents would have in

The EAI states that my ethical perspective is based on “…an individual’s duty or obligation to do what is morally right…” (WIEM, 2003). In my personal and professional life, this means that I tend to look behind the person’s actions to determine intention, rather than concentrating on results. The EAI supports my belief that human beings are entitled to basic rights, and therefore our actions must respect the rights of others: “The ends do not justify the means” (WIEM, 2003). Therefore, I believe individuals have an obligation to make choices which benefit the whole, yet do not infringe upon the rights of the individual. Thus, for example, in my ethical standpoint, the government must make policies which benefit the nation, its employees, and its citizens/residents without stripping away individual freedoms such as the right to privacy.

The EAI also recognizes that individual rights can be used to control an individual’s right to use and freely use products and services.

But as with those that prohibit the “appropriation of any proprietary product, service, or material within the domain of an organization, the protection of such product, service, or material or devices other than those which are covered by this license shall not be construed to prohibit…”