Strategy in Action Class NotesPESTEL Strategy in actionPEST/PESTLE analysisP: political factorsE: Economic factorsS: Social factorsT: Technological factorsWhy do we have to use PESTLEHave ability to analysis external environment, what is my position before I do anything with the strategy, I have to understand.My opinions to the strategy planningWhat is it, where is it usedThe challengers of external environmentPoliticalHave to understand political effectsLobbying limitations: change the way how I approach the strategies.Definition: Lobbying – (also lobby) is the act of attempting to influence decisions made by officials in the government, most often legislators or members of regulatory agencies.
I have been criticized for what is known as “strategy-plaguing, public-private, and corporate” strategies. They emphasize the use of political forces by the politicians, the companies, and the lobbyists to help increase their political influence.
It is important to have some kind of data and analysis about a politician that gives them a sense of what’s going on.This study will examine the influence campaigns and lobbyists can have to increase their influence on a campaign and how that influence can be used for various political, political parties for the duration of the campaign to improve their votes or influence their support.We wanted to do that by going back to the 1990s, which is the period in which we know a lot about how a politician was running and how their influence can be deployed to improve or change how the public sees and hear about him or her. That is also when we took all the political data. We wanted to take the influence of every single political person. This data was needed for a great variety of reasons. The focus of this study is not just the influence of politicians on the campaigns but the influence of lobbyists on the campaigns through direct lobbying and through the types of campaign expenditures.We want to have a clear idea as to how a politician’s influence can evolve, in a campaign by examining data that can improve or change the direction of a candidate. That is important for the purpose of determining the kinds of influence politics has. This study aims to put together an overview of all the influence-raising and changing tactics a politician has to make when influencing the candidates of all political parties and organizations that run campaigns in the United States.What is a tactic? A tactic was developed to allow a politician to make an effective attack on a political organization at any given time in the campaign. That is what the term “strategy”—or “strategy of operation”—is used to refer to. But here’s an important point. As opposed to strategy, which is a means to an end, this tactic is instead an end in itself. Now for a quick example (it doesn’t make any sense to write it out here), we want to point out that a politician can make a lot of calls, but not many ones. We have a very specific tactic for that. Our target is: to get rid of your opponent at least one point. If someone gets $5M in your campaign and puts him in a room with 10 members of your office and five campaign staffs you would have a lot of pressure if he didn’t come to your office. Then maybe he doesn’t come to our office. Then you have a lot of pressure to get rid of that candidate. It’s the way that we define strategy that is important, and what’s important for a campaign to have for a campaign because it
I have been criticized for what is known as “strategy-plaguing, public-private, and corporate” strategies. They emphasize the use of political forces by the politicians, the companies, and the lobbyists to help increase their political influence.
It is important to have some kind of data and analysis about a politician that gives them a sense of what’s going on.This study will examine the influence campaigns and lobbyists can have to increase their influence on a campaign and how that influence can be used for various political, political parties for the duration of the campaign to improve their votes or influence their support.We wanted to do that by going back to the 1990s, which is the period in which we know a lot about how a politician was running and how their influence can be deployed to improve or change how the public sees and hear about him or her. That is also when we took all the political data. We wanted to take the influence of every single political person. This data was needed for a great variety of reasons. The focus of this study is not just the influence of politicians on the campaigns but the influence of lobbyists on the campaigns through direct lobbying and through the types of campaign expenditures.We want to have a clear idea as to how a politician’s influence can evolve, in a campaign by examining data that can improve or change the direction of a candidate. That is important for the purpose of determining the kinds of influence politics has. This study aims to put together an overview of all the influence-raising and changing tactics a politician has to make when influencing the candidates of all political parties and organizations that run campaigns in the United States.What is a tactic? A tactic was developed to allow a politician to make an effective attack on a political organization at any given time in the campaign. That is what the term “strategy”—or “strategy of operation”—is used to refer to. But here’s an important point. As opposed to strategy, which is a means to an end, this tactic is instead an end in itself. Now for a quick example (it doesn’t make any sense to write it out here), we want to point out that a politician can make a lot of calls, but not many ones. We have a very specific tactic for that. Our target is: to get rid of your opponent at least one point. If someone gets $5M in your campaign and puts him in a room with 10 members of your office and five campaign staffs you would have a lot of pressure if he didn’t come to your office. Then maybe he doesn’t come to our office. Then you have a lot of pressure to get rid of that candidate. It’s the way that we define strategy that is important, and what’s important for a campaign to have for a campaign because it
I have been criticized for what is known as “strategy-plaguing, public-private, and corporate” strategies. They emphasize the use of political forces by the politicians, the companies, and the lobbyists to help increase their political influence.
It is important to have some kind of data and analysis about a politician that gives them a sense of what’s going on.This study will examine the influence campaigns and lobbyists can have to increase their influence on a campaign and how that influence can be used for various political, political parties for the duration of the campaign to improve their votes or influence their support.We wanted to do that by going back to the 1990s, which is the period in which we know a lot about how a politician was running and how their influence can be deployed to improve or change how the public sees and hear about him or her. That is also when we took all the political data. We wanted to take the influence of every single political person. This data was needed for a great variety of reasons. The focus of this study is not just the influence of politicians on the campaigns but the influence of lobbyists on the campaigns through direct lobbying and through the types of campaign expenditures.We want to have a clear idea as to how a politician’s influence can evolve, in a campaign by examining data that can improve or change the direction of a candidate. That is important for the purpose of determining the kinds of influence politics has. This study aims to put together an overview of all the influence-raising and changing tactics a politician has to make when influencing the candidates of all political parties and organizations that run campaigns in the United States.What is a tactic? A tactic was developed to allow a politician to make an effective attack on a political organization at any given time in the campaign. That is what the term “strategy”—or “strategy of operation”—is used to refer to. But here’s an important point. As opposed to strategy, which is a means to an end, this tactic is instead an end in itself. Now for a quick example (it doesn’t make any sense to write it out here), we want to point out that a politician can make a lot of calls, but not many ones. We have a very specific tactic for that. Our target is: to get rid of your opponent at least one point. If someone gets $5M in your campaign and puts him in a room with 10 members of your office and five campaign staffs you would have a lot of pressure if he didn’t come to your office. Then maybe he doesn’t come to our office. Then you have a lot of pressure to get rid of that candidate. It’s the way that we define strategy that is important, and what’s important for a campaign to have for a campaign because it
EconomicHave to consider home economyInterest ratesStock market: up&downE.g. Chinese stock market is rising recently, figure out why, watch time by timeSocialIncome distributionBaby xxxx: they are in the process of retire, means they have low incomes.DemographicsLabor and Social mobilityLifestyle changesAttitude to work and leisureEducation: Have to understand the education of your target customers, the situationFashion and FadsHealth and WelfareLiving conditionsTechnologicalE.g. PokemonLegal: have to understand the legal issues to effect your ability to achieve your objectivesEmployment lawHealth and safetyTaxation both corporate and consumerOther regulationsInternational trade barriers