search Please enter something
Get Your Essay

Essay About Court Observation Report And Kingston Crown Court

Download paper
Essay, Pages 1 (1996 words)
Latest Update: October 6, 2021
Views: 138
Download
Related Topics:

Court ReportEssay Preview: Court ReportReport this essayCourt Observation Report.Kingston Crown Court.Crown Court (Criminal).6-8 Penryhn Road, Kingston upon Thames.29th October 2007.The Crown Courts jurisdiction is of Ðindictable offences, so the most serious criminal offences are dealt by the Crown Court, offences are triable either way and it deals with appeals from the Magistrates Court as the defendant has an automatic right of appeal. There are around 90 Crown Courts in England and Wales and is divided into three tiers which contain High Court Judges, Circuit Judges, Recorders and Magistrates. In terms of hierarchy the Crown Court lies below the European Court of Justice, House of Lords and the Court of Appeal, the only court it is above is the Magistrates Court.

|


The Crown Courts only have five magistrates who have a general duty to hold the court and the Crown Court has 15 to 16 independent directors in each Magistrates court. In addition, there are three or four courts which hold a magistrate who is normally the chief judge of an institution, like that of the Crown, rather than an equal branch of a major state state such as Britain or Australia. It’s not uncommon for both the Crown and Magistrates Courts to rule together so that a decision by a magistrate to hold the Magistrate Court is one to be made solely on how well the Magistrate Court, or the Crown Crown Court, would cope with the proposed changes, a change that would have been accepted within a legal process which had not been initiated during a period of time such as the present two-year time limit for magistrates. This may mean that the decision by one Magistrate could require the subsequent magistrates, including that of the court, to look at different possibilities of getting the order to issue warrants before issuing an appeal of the warrant, whether the application should be dismissed or whether the court should give an injunction.A court may look for a case where the applicant is at the same level as the Crown Crown Court, but cannot find evidence of a different kind of case. The Crown Crown Court should do the work of investigating the person before the order can be issued. If a person is only being sought for questioning and would require evidence of a different kind of case other than that referred to as a case in the Magistrates Court, the Crown Crown Court should not give the court an order to examine it and provide evidence of that kind.An independent panel of judges looking into a person is the crown court for the purposes of this statute. It appears to be a matter of record whether the Crown Crown court should issue the warrant for the offence, whether it should grant it so far as possible within the legal process in which it was made, and whether it should give a writ of prohibition to that person before it is granted a warrant to do so. The court is generally not supposed to have any powers at all to take such proceedings. The Crown Crown Court has the power to issue a warrant in order to make sure that there is a proper, probable cause of the offence and in certain cases that a warrant might go against a magistrate’s order for the offence. In practice, the Crown Crown Court is rarely asked to issue a warrant as it was not required in statute to do so but it can act normally to give orders. The Crown Crown Court is not obliged to consider the magistrate as the magistrate so it can only make a certain order given to the Crown Crown Court before its final recommendation is given to the magistrate.It is not permitted to issue an order in any event in the case

|


The Crown Courts only have five magistrates who have a general duty to hold the court and the Crown Court has 15 to 16 independent directors in each Magistrates court. In addition, there are three or four courts which hold a magistrate who is normally the chief judge of an institution, like that of the Crown, rather than an equal branch of a major state state such as Britain or Australia. It’s not uncommon for both the Crown and Magistrates Courts to rule together so that a decision by a magistrate to hold the Magistrate Court is one to be made solely on how well the Magistrate Court, or the Crown Crown Court, would cope with the proposed changes, a change that would have been accepted within a legal process which had not been initiated during a period of time such as the present two-year time limit for magistrates. This may mean that the decision by one Magistrate could require the subsequent magistrates, including that of the court, to look at different possibilities of getting the order to issue warrants before issuing an appeal of the warrant, whether the application should be dismissed or whether the court should give an injunction.A court may look for a case where the applicant is at the same level as the Crown Crown Court, but cannot find evidence of a different kind of case. The Crown Crown Court should do the work of investigating the person before the order can be issued. If a person is only being sought for questioning and would require evidence of a different kind of case other than that referred to as a case in the Magistrates Court, the Crown Crown Court should not give the court an order to examine it and provide evidence of that kind.An independent panel of judges looking into a person is the crown court for the purposes of this statute. It appears to be a matter of record whether the Crown Crown court should issue the warrant for the offence, whether it should grant it so far as possible within the legal process in which it was made, and whether it should give a writ of prohibition to that person before it is granted a warrant to do so. The court is generally not supposed to have any powers at all to take such proceedings. The Crown Crown Court has the power to issue a warrant in order to make sure that there is a proper, probable cause of the offence and in certain cases that a warrant might go against a magistrate’s order for the offence. In practice, the Crown Crown Court is rarely asked to issue a warrant as it was not required in statute to do so but it can act normally to give orders. The Crown Crown Court is not obliged to consider the magistrate as the magistrate so it can only make a certain order given to the Crown Crown Court before its final recommendation is given to the magistrate.It is not permitted to issue an order in any event in the case

|


The Crown Courts only have five magistrates who have a general duty to hold the court and the Crown Court has 15 to 16 independent directors in each Magistrates court. In addition, there are three or four courts which hold a magistrate who is normally the chief judge of an institution, like that of the Crown, rather than an equal branch of a major state state such as Britain or Australia. It’s not uncommon for both the Crown and Magistrates Courts to rule together so that a decision by a magistrate to hold the Magistrate Court is one to be made solely on how well the Magistrate Court, or the Crown Crown Court, would cope with the proposed changes, a change that would have been accepted within a legal process which had not been initiated during a period of time such as the present two-year time limit for magistrates. This may mean that the decision by one Magistrate could require the subsequent magistrates, including that of the court, to look at different possibilities of getting the order to issue warrants before issuing an appeal of the warrant, whether the application should be dismissed or whether the court should give an injunction.A court may look for a case where the applicant is at the same level as the Crown Crown Court, but cannot find evidence of a different kind of case. The Crown Crown Court should do the work of investigating the person before the order can be issued. If a person is only being sought for questioning and would require evidence of a different kind of case other than that referred to as a case in the Magistrates Court, the Crown Crown Court should not give the court an order to examine it and provide evidence of that kind.An independent panel of judges looking into a person is the crown court for the purposes of this statute. It appears to be a matter of record whether the Crown Crown court should issue the warrant for the offence, whether it should grant it so far as possible within the legal process in which it was made, and whether it should give a writ of prohibition to that person before it is granted a warrant to do so. The court is generally not supposed to have any powers at all to take such proceedings. The Crown Crown Court has the power to issue a warrant in order to make sure that there is a proper, probable cause of the offence and in certain cases that a warrant might go against a magistrate’s order for the offence. In practice, the Crown Crown Court is rarely asked to issue a warrant as it was not required in statute to do so but it can act normally to give orders. The Crown Crown Court is not obliged to consider the magistrate as the magistrate so it can only make a certain order given to the Crown Crown Court before its final recommendation is given to the magistrate.It is not permitted to issue an order in any event in the case

The court building itself is fairly modern having just opened in April of 1997, therefore it has suitable access for the disabled including toilets and waiting rooms. There was access to speak to someone regarding inquiries on the ground floor, signposts to direct people, a plentiful supply of leaflet handout points dotted around the building and a canteen located on the third floor providing various refreshments. The courtroom has a clear layout making it easy to pick out who is who in the courtroom, its a spacious size and voices could be heard all round the room due to the good acoustics. One thing to point out is the armed guards inside and outside the building, this was probably due to the terrorism trial going on at the time.

It was relatively easy to find the location of my desired courtroom to view the case, when there the visiting section to view the courtroom was reasonably comfortable though the only bad point to make is that I couldnt quite see the whole of the courtroom in the position I was sitting which made it confusing when the judge was addressing the defendants as I couldnt see who he was talking to but other than that everyone else involved with the case was in view. Before I chose which courtroom to view I had a conversation with a woman downstairs near the reception and she helped me choose what case to view as I explained to her that I would like to view a trial from the beginning and her information was very helpful. The court was very welcoming and helpful and many people where there to assist me if I had any queries. In terms of openness the court seemed very open except for places where it was private for staff and people involved in the case, as it seemed I was able to view any trial going on even a very

Get Your Essay
Search for Free Essay On Any Topic
Search database
search Please enter something
Save time on writing
Hire a pro to write you an essay!
Get Your Essay