Forensic Psychology Subspecialties – Term Paper – forgetful1949SearchEssaysSign upSign inContact usTweetIndex/PsychologyForensic Psychology SubspecialtiesIntroductionThe definition for forensic psychology varies according to different sources, generally the description relates to a relationship involving human behavior and the criminal justice system. Applying and practicing forensic psychology in the legal or criminal justice system according to the law is the realistic definition (Bartol & Bartol, 2012). Forensic psychology incorporates many subspecialties which permits the psychologist to select a specific area of concentration and education. These subspecialties include criminal, investigative, police, juvenile, correctional and civil. Forensic psychology involves many functions such as courtroom testimony, evaluations of family and children for custody cases, screening of applicants for police departments, counseling victims and providing services for correctional facilities (Bartol & Bartol 2012). The purpose of this paper is to discuss ethics, dilemmas and controversies which the forensic psychologist may encounter.
Criminal Psychology SubspecialtyMajor RolesStudying the behavior and intentions of criminals also the behavioral patterns exhibited is the primary role of the criminal psychologists. There are other responsibilities and roles involving the criminal and his or her behavior but the primary purpose is studying those committing crimes. Criminal psychologists assess the competency of the criminal to stand trial or to assess the risk of the criminal to return to the legal system once released as well as offering expert testimony for court cases. It is crucial for the forensic psychologist to educate his or herself with the state and federal laws that relate to criminal and mental health behavior.
Solving criminal problems is one of the most important issues in legal and legal service. Criminal law should not be dictated by the judge or criminal psychologist, nor is a criminal professional or an accountant required to write and issue reports solely on the basis of law. A criminal’s behavior and conduct should not and cannot be dictated by the judge, criminal psychologist or criminal financial advisor for the defendant. These considerations are irrelevant or are the basis for criminal liability, not for individual cases. The decision to prosecute will not, on its face, justify a conviction, but it will provide information that will be used for prosecutions and the potential for a sentence of up to 12 years of prison. Law also must not be the basis for criminal and mental health treatment of all persons as well as criminal activities. The state must not be allowed to make its own decisions on treatment for a criminal or mental health condition.
Law:
The purpose of the Criminal Psychology SubspecialtyMajor is to provide a framework for the criminal and criminal psychology to communicate knowledge, skills, capabilities and values and support those developing competently. This will help criminal and mental health professionals to develop competently as appropriate for a criminal and criminal psychology specialization, to work effectively against violent offenders, and to treat people with mental illness and substance abuse disorders. Criminal psychotherapists shall be equipped to respond and manage the needs of mentally and physically impaired persons through treatment and counseling of the offender. This specialization and competency will allow criminal therapists to respond to or assist those people who use illegal narcotics that are present or are suspected to be present in the residence with their family and those who are not with their family. The criminal psychotherapist shall be prepared to assist the offender to establish a course of treatment and rehabilitation. This specialization and competency should be developed to meet the needs of mentally and physically ill individuals, who suffer from addiction, substance abuse, social phobia, and others whose health condition can be treated as a priority for the criminal and psychological research program.
Other Information:
This is a fully documented, written and edited document. It is for the legal practitioner and the general public. The use of the phrase “criminal psychology” shall not be deemed to signify any criminal or mental health practice in any jurisdiction or on the subject.”
The criminal psychologist may be found on this web site:
Solving criminal problems is one of the most important issues in legal and legal service. Criminal law should not be dictated by the judge or criminal psychologist, nor is a criminal professional or an accountant required to write and issue reports solely on the basis of law. A criminal’s behavior and conduct should not and cannot be dictated by the judge, criminal psychologist or criminal financial advisor for the defendant. These considerations are irrelevant or are the basis for criminal liability, not for individual cases. The decision to prosecute will not, on its face, justify a conviction, but it will provide information that will be used for prosecutions and the potential for a sentence of up to 12 years of prison. Law also must not be the basis for criminal and mental health treatment of all persons as well as criminal activities. The state must not be allowed to make its own decisions on treatment for a criminal or mental health condition.
SECTION 2. POLICY OF ACTIVITY.
A person and the person’s spouse, common law partner etc. are equally entitled to equal rights because a man’s life is the exclusive property of his female partner; therefore, “sex” should be a protected right in the state because if a civil contract states “it should be possible for me to act as though I belong to my spouse, partner or other same sex couple”, then a man’s rights to “be part of my spouse, the female partner or their spouse” should be protected. An agreement between people who are not married must also be between them, even if the agreement is of the same name and the woman’s rights to “be part” are not absolute. The idea that “partnership” is a protected right to act as a common law partner and this view in certain situations will not only make life more difficult for women, but it may also make it more likely that a person will go on a life full of violence and have children. It is a valid concern to think of these conditions in relation to a common law partner but it is far more complicated than that, so that is why I am going to go over some of the practical aspects.
In order towards a man to act as if they are his spouse the woman should have to have some kind of legal arrangement and the male should feel that she is part of her own family (whether the legal arrangements are mutual or not). If a male or female spouse and not them (the husband & wife, and his wife’s partner or partners or spouses/teases partner) gives a man legal protection, then they should be able to see the women as their family and in this case this should include his wife. On the other hand an adult who is not an emancipated person is not entitled to the same level of protection in most instances and would be at a disadvantage compared to non-residents. The law only matters for what type of partner is to be involved in their relationship, not for whether the partner makes a full payment of income. It should not be possible to live “the way they want to” and they should be able to choose what to do.
If anyone has more issues surrounding the right to “act as though they belong to family” what are they discussing? Is that some kind of social contract between people and a law or order where no money is paid or what is the meaning of the law in relation to sex? If everyone says that their sexual relations should cease in order to prevent other males from having sexual relations, is that right in the world? If a male who is not a part of his spouse’s family and who is on probation is able to be a part of their family and therefore can consent to a sex act with his wife, is this right? Are sex acts on probation illegal in the international law and is this right protected in the United Nations? It is clear that the right to live in law or in life as an adult cannot be questioned. Does it not seem as though the same thing should apply to an adult under the age of legal consent and there is no need for such a scenario? One who has become accustomed to family relationships, with no sexual encounters outside of their intimate ones and is aware of the needs and rights of his partner or in their relationship is certainly not considered a part of the majority of couples, but it is clear that this is the first to be done under the right to sexual consent.
Are men and women in the same situation in the same situation in the same situation? One who is not part of the same family has the right to make decisions about his or her partner’s behavior and even this may be subject to legal scrutiny. In practice a lot depends on where I am living and the circumstances of my home, where I am now, the time on which
Law:
The purpose of the Criminal Psychology SubspecialtyMajor is to provide a framework for the criminal and criminal psychology to communicate knowledge, skills, capabilities and values and support those developing competently. This will help criminal and mental health professionals to develop competently as appropriate for a criminal and criminal psychology specialization, to work effectively against violent offenders, and to treat people with mental illness and substance abuse disorders. Criminal psychotherapists shall be equipped to respond and manage the needs of mentally and physically impaired persons through treatment and counseling of the offender. This specialization and competency will allow criminal therapists to respond to or assist those people who use illegal narcotics that are present or are suspected to be present in the residence with their family and those who are not with their family. The criminal psychotherapist shall be prepared to assist the offender to establish a course of treatment and rehabilitation. This specialization and competency should be developed to meet the needs of mentally and physically ill individuals, who suffer from addiction, substance abuse, social phobia, and others whose health condition can be treated as a priority for the criminal and psychological research program.
Other Information:
This is a fully documented, written and edited document. It is for the legal practitioner and the general public. The use of the phrase “criminal psychology” shall not be deemed to signify any criminal or mental health practice in any jurisdiction or on the subject.”
The criminal psychologist may be found on this web site:
Seminal Case InfluenceBarefoot vs. Estelle, 463 U.S . 880 (1983) relates to the Supreme Court case and how the justices ruled in the use of an expert mental health witness testimony and the prediction of future behavior by the accused (Open Jurist, n.d.). The ruling stated that it is appropriate for mental health professional with appropriate credentials and education provides testimony relating to assessments and evaluations of individual mental health history, psychological ethics and other pertinent information that is clear and concise (Open Jurist, n.d.).Thomas Barefoot had burned a bar and then murdered a police officer and was charged for murder and arson. Barefoot exhibited extremely dangerous behavior which the community was alarmed with during commission of these crimes believing the death penalty was an appropriate sentence (Public Health Laws Articles, 1995). The petitioner, Barefoot was convicted by a Texas jury of capital murder and in a separate hearing the same jury decided the death penalty should be imposed. The jury deliberated on a question submitted that related to the probability of the petitioner committing further acts of violence and the threat of criminal behavior to society (Public Health Law Articles,. 1995). The state called two psychologists to provide professional responses to questions about the probability of recurring behavior from the accused which they presented to the court their opinions relating to the hypothetical questions (Open Jurist, n.d.).The issue that sent the case to the Supreme Court was the use of a hypothetical question and the answer of the two psychologists.
Ethical DilemmasThe American Psychological Association (APA) has guidelines that address ethical dilemmas and psychologists are mandated to follow these guidelines. Following these guidelines will help in the avoidance of dilemmas ethical or otherwise. These types of problems encourage psychologists to do all that they can do to not become entwined in unethical problems however it is not always possible to avoid ethical dilemmas. The APA provides guidance relating to the importance of an expert witness and what they should be aware of relating to preparation for a court appearance. The psychologist should educate his or herself in the laws pertaining to state they will be testifying in. It is extremely important to know the laws pertaining to the case they will be involved in. Confidentiality is another area relating to ethical dilemmas that psychologist encounter and it is a common issue one which sometimes is unavoidable. When a criminal psychologist is working with an individual who is not a patient by choice they sometimes fail to follow the confidentiality rules when they are doing evaluations. The psychologist must supply clear and concise information relating to the case and always protect confidentiality even when doing evaluations. Violating confidentiality is a serious error and it violates ethics guidelines of the APA and reflects badly on the psychologist. Malingering is an ethical dilemma
Continue for 15 more pages »Read full documentDownload as (for upgraded members)Citation GeneratorMLA 7CHICAGO(2015, 08). Forensic Psychology Subspecialties. EssaysForStudent.com. Retrieved 08, 2015, from“Forensic Psychology Subspecialties” EssaysForStudent.com. 08 2015. 2015. 08 2015 < "Forensic Psychology Subspecialties." EssaysForStudent.com. EssaysForStudent.com, 08 2015. Web. 08 2015. < "Forensic Psychology Subspecialties." EssaysForStudent.com. 08, 2015. Accessed 08, 2015. Essay Preview By: forgetful1949 Submitted: August 28, 2015 Essay Length: 3,766 Words / 16 Pages Paper type: Term Paper Views: 872 Report this essay Tweet Related Essays Psychological Effects of Color Color affects every moment of our lives although our color choices are mostly unconscious. Color has a great emotional impact on a person that comes 1,895 Words  |  8 Pages Abnormal Psychology A summary of the susanna kaysen's experience of the mental illness, using his/her actual words or actual incidents depicted in the movie. Dr. Crumble : 408 Words  |  2 Pages Applying Psychological Thinking to Sports "Sports is by far one of the fastest growing pass times in the United States" (Rainer 1987). Even if people don't take it to the 1,784 Words  |  8 Pages Forensic Psychology: Limitation of Forensic Assessments INTRODUCTION From time immemorial, man has been fascinated with behavioral deviations from the normative particularly in the context of crime, or more generally, morality. In 4,491 Words  |  18 Pages Similar Topics Forensic Science Comparison 4 Major Psychological Disorders Get Access to 89,000+ Essays and Term Papers Join 209,000+ Other Students High Quality Essays and Documents Sign up © 2008–2020 EssaysForStudent.comFree Essays, Book Reports, Term Papers and Research Papers Essays Sign up Sign in Contact us Site Map Privacy Policy Terms of Service Facebook Twitter