Questionable Immigration Myths
Essay Preview: Questionable Immigration Myths
Report this essay
Jason
Professor
English 1020-52
14 October 2004
Questionable Immigration Myths
David Coles “Five Myths about Immigration,” while not a persuasive argument, is obviously a personal issue for the author who believes Americans treat immigrants poorly. He introduces the reader to “Know Nothings,” or “Native Americans,” who blame every problem in America on the immigrants (Cole 189-90). In the introductory paragraph, Cole attempts to obtain the readers sympathetic feelings as he writes with great passion when he describes the mistreatment his Irish Catholic immigrant ancestors endured (190). This in turn raises the question of how objective he could remain when presenting his arguments. Coles attempts to disprove the five myths about immigrants are not effective as his tone is often too personal, clouding his judgment, and his statistics and some data are either lacking credibility or logic.
The first myth is that “America is being overrun with immigrants” (190) and Cole uses statistics to contradict this belief, but they are not credible and cause the reader to question whether Cole looked at the whole picture (190). His statistical argument, “As of 1990, foreign born people made up only eight percent of the population, compared with [Ð] fifteen percent from 1870 to 1920” (Cole190) appears convincing to the reader, but is misleading because eight percent of the population in the 1990s was significantly more than fifteen percent of the population in 1870 to 1920. Cole does not present accurate statistics to refute this first myth.
For the myth “Immigrants take jobs from U.S. citizens” (190), Cole presents a report that states, “Immigrants actually create more jobs that they fill” (190-91). He uses data from a study to support his statement, but a common fear exists– if the number of jobs is fixed and immigrants fill some of those jobs, fewer jobs will be available for the “natives.” This fear is illogic to the reader because the working immigrant will indeed become a consumer of the “natives” products and services. In addition, another common notion is that most immigrants will end up on welfare which correlates with the myth, “Immigrants are a drain on societys resources” (191). It is common knowledge to the reader that many immigrants with little or no education can obtain agricultural work in the fields and a 1994 Urban Institute study summarized “immigrants generate significantly more in taxes paid than they cost in services received” (191). Cole effectively uses data from studies and reports in his appeal to logic and does manage to convince the reader that immigrants do not reduce American jobs or resources.
Cole refutes another myth, “Aliens refuse to assimilate and are depriving us of our cultural and political unity” (191), with another passionate appeal when he writes, “Descendants of the Irish Catholics [Ð…] once decried as separatist and alien, have become presidents, senators” (192) as he argues that immigrants get pushed to conform (192). In logic, the reader will agree that the “Natives” and immigrants became united after September 11 to demand for a safer country and world. Although Cole uses effective logic