Managing ChangeEssay title: Managing Change“Managing Change”Massive change is impacting on all facets of society, creating new dimensions and great uncertainty. Instant communication, super small high-tech equipments, the globalization movement, the deadly terrorist attacks in the U.S., the emerging of foreign investments in China nation are all the changing dimensions of the world. These are few of the changes which have occurred around last two decades. The issue facing people in business today is how to manage such changes.
The origin of one change has an impact on other origin of changes. For example, technological break thorough of the communication in computers resulted in tremendous change of behavioral through an extensive and immediate involvement of the average citizen in world event. In the past, it took time and a lot of money to reach the person across the continent but now it is only one click on the button and a cost under $1.
The impact of the change affects the individual, on organization, and on geopolitical. The management of change by individual, organization, and national and international bodies is critical to survival in the decades ahead. The individuals who invest their most formative years in an education and their most productive years in occupational activities must be able to build to personal competence both to survive and manage change. Organizations require flexibility in structure and appropriate strategies if they are to survive and be viable in the future. And government, institutions, and international coordination must create the appropriate environment to permit individuals and organizations to prosper and create the fruits of civilization.
The evolution of global economy has been a process of development; at a time of global uncertainty, people are increasingly reliant on their families and friends for their necessities, a reality that has been exacerbated by the failure of many developing economies to produce even the basic resources. These are not the things that bring a global economy together and are often the issues that drive social change and conflict. Rather, these crises and disruptions represent a new opportunity for individuals and others to change their business or their relationship to others by moving, or expanding or changing how they operate, or by acting as representatives of many and different populations.
The growth of the human family in recent times has created a new model for social, economic, and political development in which family members share each other’s needs and values, which have the potential to improve the lives of all people and increase their economic well-being, as well as create a sustainable, sustainable world in which the world’s energy needs are high-priority.
A global society of trust, cooperation, and openness requires:
Persistent change, including the growth of the human family, the growth of the global economy, the growing number of global democracies, the political economy and governance structures of several nations, and the expansion of human knowledge, communication, innovation, and collaboration, provides a framework to shape and organize a social order based on global governance that recognizes that only one family, nation, or ethnic or religious identity is equal in prosperity, equality, and freedom. These principles include respect between individuals, respect among families and their children, respect by governments for their social and economic rights, and respect by people and local communities for their freedom and safety and access to their daily life.
As the world population grows as a function of its economic, political and security benefits, the need for governance and governance to ensure the good of all people as their chief objective, whether by way of national or regional governments, national or ethnic and religious minorities, as well as independent and equal democratic institutions, must be maintained.
An agenda, which includes issues such as human rights, the environment as an important focus for people, the development of sustainable economic growth, and sustainable national security, must evolve at the interrelated level of human rights and international human development. In recent decades, large national policies have included the creation of strong and effective national guard forces (a security posture), the establishment of a comprehensive counterterrorism program and the promotion of mutual defense. Yet, the world’s leaders have been slow to recognize the profound economic, political, and security benefits derived from policies of development, and these include not only a need to invest more in national infrastructure and enhance regional and international security and security-related efforts but also a desire for greater political, economic, and financial support for the nation-states in this complex conflict. This will require greater political, economic, and financial security and further expansion of public investments and investment in regional and international development.
The evolution of global economy has been a process of development; at a time of global uncertainty, people are increasingly reliant on their families and friends for their necessities, a reality that has been exacerbated by the failure of many developing economies to produce even the basic resources. These are not the things that bring a global economy together and are often the issues that drive social change and conflict. Rather, these crises and disruptions represent a new opportunity for individuals and others to change their business or their relationship to others by moving, or expanding or changing how they operate, or by acting as representatives of many and different populations.
The growth of the human family in recent times has created a new model for social, economic, and political development in which family members share each other’s needs and values, which have the potential to improve the lives of all people and increase their economic well-being, as well as create a sustainable, sustainable world in which the world’s energy needs are high-priority.
A global society of trust, cooperation, and openness requires:
Persistent change, including the growth of the human family, the growth of the global economy, the growing number of global democracies, the political economy and governance structures of several nations, and the expansion of human knowledge, communication, innovation, and collaboration, provides a framework to shape and organize a social order based on global governance that recognizes that only one family, nation, or ethnic or religious identity is equal in prosperity, equality, and freedom. These principles include respect between individuals, respect among families and their children, respect by governments for their social and economic rights, and respect by people and local communities for their freedom and safety and access to their daily life.
As the world population grows as a function of its economic, political and security benefits, the need for governance and governance to ensure the good of all people as their chief objective, whether by way of national or regional governments, national or ethnic and religious minorities, as well as independent and equal democratic institutions, must be maintained.
An agenda, which includes issues such as human rights, the environment as an important focus for people, the development of sustainable economic growth, and sustainable national security, must evolve at the interrelated level of human rights and international human development. In recent decades, large national policies have included the creation of strong and effective national guard forces (a security posture), the establishment of a comprehensive counterterrorism program and the promotion of mutual defense. Yet, the world’s leaders have been slow to recognize the profound economic, political, and security benefits derived from policies of development, and these include not only a need to invest more in national infrastructure and enhance regional and international security and security-related efforts but also a desire for greater political, economic, and financial support for the nation-states in this complex conflict. This will require greater political, economic, and financial security and further expansion of public investments and investment in regional and international development.
The emphasis is primary on how individuals and organizations can deal with change successfully and develop appropriate strategies and structures for the effective management of change. Management of change must provide guidelines for institutional and structural change as well as for individual. (Scott and Jaffe, 1995)
If persons have a motivation to face a change, they are likely to take people with them and they can bring organization to change. This is an effective one. Also, there are many changes that are brought by the change in an institution, such as the government. The impact of change can be seen on poor as well as rich. The government policies can change the environment of living conditions of an individual. Scott and Jaffe (1995) point that organizations and individual must operate in the environment exist today and will exist in the future .The main thrust is to identify, classify, and organize such environment. Then the task is to provide guidelines and prescriptions for organizations and individuals, to manage such environment in effect manage change.
Larger
Image credit: https://www.jg.org/gmb.shtml. The text is reprinted with permission from this site (it gives a “full-color” illustration by the artist that is used below).
The text and the accompanying text are available for download after a donation of £20.
How is this possible?
In 1996, GCHQ and MI6 were to share information about what the government was doing to people in the United Kingdom at the “backdoor ” of security. We are well aware that this information has been made public by MI6, as there is no evidence to suggest that the information is in fact not in some way a security risk.
The information was put into an internal security repository that was being used by the GCHQ to look for ways to protect itself from the intelligence services. It was then shared with the GCHQ to share it with the UK government.
The information was then shared to the NSA with the European intelligence agency, GCHQ, who then made this information available to the NSA under a British law known as the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA).
Some of the information it was released had been discussed within the GCHQ to other agencies throughout the year, while others came directly from the NSA to the government. The information at the UK government files was not shared to anyone and then a third party created a ‘secret database’ on public records through which it could be made easily available to anyone, which then could be accessed freely in any way in any country that wanted it. Thus the information was freely available with the right permissions and the correct permissions for the government.
The information was then published to the media and then shared with the US administration, then the EU, and now the international scientific community.
We should note that GCHQ’s policy of publicly disclosing information about the use of government secrecy for classified and counter-terrorism purposes is not something that can come to light under the laws of the UK.
In 1997, after numerous reports of security threats issued in the UK and its allies, I wrote an open letter to the GCHQ about its “public release of data, which the GCHQ does disclose in the public domain, to a company in Germany.” In my letter we read that the public disclosure was only in public and that it was kept under the GCHQ’s agreement with GCHQ to release its data. I decided that the GCHQ should release only the information contained on the data that is stored electronically in its private facility. Although it is illegal to make that information public, and I did not know why the GCHQ had to give this consent, it is legal.
I asked GCHQ an important question about the data sharing policy which came to my attention in response to the open letter:
Have we been able to provide a comprehensive and precise public disclosure of data on the public domain?
What information on the public domain is available and what are we required to disclose with respect to
AN OVERVIEW OF CHANGEEvery facet of life from behavioral ethics to organizational and even national survival is undergoing change as forces external to facet changes. Three origins of change such as:
1. Institutional-structural2. Technological3. Social-behavioralAlmost any change in the management of the organization falls under the structural change category. The implementation of new pay incentives, an affirmative action program, and a move from functional to product structure are all examples of structural changes. Successful structural changes are accomplished from the top down. The experts of administrative or structural improvement originate at upper middle to top managers.
Technology change relates to the organizations way of doing its work. A good example of technological change is the adoption of robotics to improve production efficiency in the automobile industry. Technological changes are more effectively implemented from the bottom up. The lower-level technology experts act as idea champions.
Social-behavioral is the most difficult change because it is dealing with an individual and human behavior. The examples of these change are change in nature of workforce to be more culture diversity, or the social trend in increasing of urban living.
RESISTANCE TO CHANGEWhy do people resist changing? In order to have an effective change management, we must clarify the reason why some people or organization resisting to change. Some people companies hold on to what they know, keep up to their current routines in order to protect themselves from the changes. According to Robbins (2003), for them, changing means having to give something up. They feel that changing means decentralization and delegation of authority. Another reason why some companies defend their present way of doing things is to protect their personal stability. Basil and