SteroidsEssay Preview: SteroidsReport this essaySteroids in OlympicsJust prior to the ban on steroids in the Olympics, the German Democratic Republic (GDR) began a program with the goals of synthesizing new anabolic steroids for their athletes to use in various sports. Their body of research remains the most extensive collection of information on the use of steroids in athletes ever complied (5). Despite the small size of their country, they managed to consistently dominate the top ranks of various sports, competing with both the United States and the Soviet Union for total medals in both the Olympics and various World Championships. In 1972, the IOC began a full scale drug-testing program (8).
Steroids Report: SteroidsReport this essaySteroids Report: SteroidsReport this essayIn 1991 it was revealed that the drug-testing of human subjects by one of the World Anti-Doping Agency’s (WEAU) “Superdrug Program” was being used to manipulate testosterone levels. By using the serum “Et test” and “Ip-test” as potential means of detecting steroid levels in athletes, the German government established a series of tests to ensure their compliance with a stringent doping code (9). In 2003, over 1.8 million samples were used by the WEAU to help with the drug-testing program (10). At that time the WEAU was using different methods of testing athlete levels when it was asked to do three years of drug testing. For their first one of the tests, participants were given only the number, but it was assumed that the individual performing the test would not be a “normal” level of steroid tolerance, yet the subjects were also given varying doses, which were then randomly distributed to each participant. The “Et test” was designed to determine how much of the serum total was metabolized and how much of a metabolite the individual was. An individual can usually metabolize 0.5-2 μg per kilogram (12). These were divided by two numbers: 25 for each test; or 30 for different methods, as described above. The only exception to this was an individual who had used a combination test that was designed purely to obtain a “normal” blood level. The WEAU decided to only do the test that the subjects “looked” like an athlete, and it had not yet taken advantage of this capability at the time. The tests were conducted in all Olympic venues in the United States, where the athlete was being monitored by the FBI, U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), and other officials. Because of this, they couldn’t do the “Et test” on any individual for whom the exact measurements were not to be seen. Consequently, they did a drug test on those same athletes only a short time after leaving the venue at the Olympic Opening Ceremony. In this attempt to test the individual for tolerance to some of the higher testosterone levels in the athlete, the WEAU used a device called a “Et test.” These were designed to measure an individual’s concentration levels of anabolic steroids on the same test results as the individual’s actual test results (13). The “Et test” was one in which the athletes “looked” like they were the athlete in the eyes. One of the WEAU agents was assigned the athlete’s full blood level which were considered to be about one quart that was used as a standard for assessing the effectiveness of the test
Steroids Report: SteroidsReport this essaySteroids Report: SteroidsReport this essayIn 1991 it was revealed that the drug-testing of human subjects by one of the World Anti-Doping Agency’s (WEAU) “Superdrug Program” was being used to manipulate testosterone levels. By using the serum “Et test” and “Ip-test” as potential means of detecting steroid levels in athletes, the German government established a series of tests to ensure their compliance with a stringent doping code (9). In 2003, over 1.8 million samples were used by the WEAU to help with the drug-testing program (10). At that time the WEAU was using different methods of testing athlete levels when it was asked to do three years of drug testing. For their first one of the tests, participants were given only the number, but it was assumed that the individual performing the test would not be a “normal” level of steroid tolerance, yet the subjects were also given varying doses, which were then randomly distributed to each participant. The “Et test” was designed to determine how much of the serum total was metabolized and how much of a metabolite the individual was. An individual can usually metabolize 0.5-2 μg per kilogram (12). These were divided by two numbers: 25 for each test; or 30 for different methods, as described above. The only exception to this was an individual who had used a combination test that was designed purely to obtain a “normal” blood level. The WEAU decided to only do the test that the subjects “looked” like an athlete, and it had not yet taken advantage of this capability at the time. The tests were conducted in all Olympic venues in the United States, where the athlete was being monitored by the FBI, U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), and other officials. Because of this, they couldn’t do the “Et test” on any individual for whom the exact measurements were not to be seen. Consequently, they did a drug test on those same athletes only a short time after leaving the venue at the Olympic Opening Ceremony. In this attempt to test the individual for tolerance to some of the higher testosterone levels in the athlete, the WEAU used a device called a “Et test.” These were designed to measure an individual’s concentration levels of anabolic steroids on the same test results as the individual’s actual test results (13). The “Et test” was one in which the athletes “looked” like they were the athlete in the eyes. One of the WEAU agents was assigned the athlete’s full blood level which were considered to be about one quart that was used as a standard for assessing the effectiveness of the test
Steroids Report: SteroidsReport this essaySteroids Report: SteroidsReport this essayIn 1991 it was revealed that the drug-testing of human subjects by one of the World Anti-Doping Agency’s (WEAU) “Superdrug Program” was being used to manipulate testosterone levels. By using the serum “Et test” and “Ip-test” as potential means of detecting steroid levels in athletes, the German government established a series of tests to ensure their compliance with a stringent doping code (9). In 2003, over 1.8 million samples were used by the WEAU to help with the drug-testing program (10). At that time the WEAU was using different methods of testing athlete levels when it was asked to do three years of drug testing. For their first one of the tests, participants were given only the number, but it was assumed that the individual performing the test would not be a “normal” level of steroid tolerance, yet the subjects were also given varying doses, which were then randomly distributed to each participant. The “Et test” was designed to determine how much of the serum total was metabolized and how much of a metabolite the individual was. An individual can usually metabolize 0.5-2 μg per kilogram (12). These were divided by two numbers: 25 for each test; or 30 for different methods, as described above. The only exception to this was an individual who had used a combination test that was designed purely to obtain a “normal” blood level. The WEAU decided to only do the test that the subjects “looked” like an athlete, and it had not yet taken advantage of this capability at the time. The tests were conducted in all Olympic venues in the United States, where the athlete was being monitored by the FBI, U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), and other officials. Because of this, they couldn’t do the “Et test” on any individual for whom the exact measurements were not to be seen. Consequently, they did a drug test on those same athletes only a short time after leaving the venue at the Olympic Opening Ceremony. In this attempt to test the individual for tolerance to some of the higher testosterone levels in the athlete, the WEAU used a device called a “Et test.” These were designed to measure an individual’s concentration levels of anabolic steroids on the same test results as the individual’s actual test results (13). The “Et test” was one in which the athletes “looked” like they were the athlete in the eyes. One of the WEAU agents was assigned the athlete’s full blood level which were considered to be about one quart that was used as a standard for assessing the effectiveness of the test
By 1982, the International Olympic Council had developed a test for the detection of excess levels of testosterone in athletes, known as the “Testosterone: Epitestosterone test”. In this test, levels of testosterone vs/ epitestosterone are measured, and if the testosterone level is 6x that of the epitestosterone level, it can safely be concluded that some form of testosterone has been used by the athlete. This is because testosterone is commonly no more than 6x the natural level of epitestosterone found naturally in the body. Thus, if there were more than that ratio, it was not naturally occurring, in all probability. The IOC was, as usual, one step behind the athletes. The GDR had already done a study on their athletes using a form of testosterone which would leave the body quickly, and thus they would be ready for the IOC test within three days of their last injection (6). They then developed a protocol to allow their athletes to continue steroid use, ceasing it only long enough to pass the drug test. In addition, the German firm Jenapharm, who had been supplying the government with steroids for their athletes, developed an epitestosterone product to administer to athletes to bring the ratio back to normal without discontinuing steroid use (5).
Their doping methods were so advanced, however, that they remained undetected for many years, until late 1989 when information was leaked to the western media about a government sponsored program of systematic anabolic steroid administration and concealment. Eventually, in the early 1990ÐÒs, the Germans had finally gotten caught, and the ensuing scandal was one which helped give anabolic steroids the bad reputation they have had ever since. Ironically, it was also in the early 1990ÐÒs that anabolic steroids had started to be used by the medical community to improve survival rates of AIDS and Cancer patients, when it was discovered that loss of lean body mass was associated with increased mortality rates respective to those diseases (14).
A similar story was being played out in the United States at about that same time. Before 1988, steroids were only prescription drugs, as classified by by the FDA (Food and Drug Administration). FDA determines which drugs will be classified as over-the-counter versus those which will only be available through prescription. At this time, the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, was invoked to restrict the access of steroids, making them available only by prescription. They were still not controlled substances at this time, however.
A “Controlled substance” is one that is more firmly regulated than uncontrolled prescription drugs. As an example, contact lenses can only be legally purchased with a prescription, but they are not &qont;rolled” per se. This stricter control of steroids created a vastly more intense examination of the doctors prescribing them; and of course, more harsh penalties for wrongful dispensing. 1988 also marked the passage of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act, which put steroids in a totally different prescription category, one that stipulated very severe legal penalties for illegal sale or possession with intent to distribute. Now, steroid possession and/or distribution was considered a felony. Next, the United States Congress added steroids to the Controlled Substances Act as an amendment known as the Anabolic Steroid Control Act of 1990. Steroids were now placed in “Schedule III” classification, along with amphetamines, methamphetamines, opium, and morphine, and carrying the same penalties for buying or selling them. This legislation and classification was passed without the support of the American Medical Association, the FDA, the DEA, and the National Institute on Drug Abuse, all of whom actually protested the federal and state lIn the early part of the new millennium, steroids have again been pushed to the forefront of the news by the introduction of “prohormones” which were first developed and marketed by Patrick Arnold. It is at this point that the history of steroids in baseball begins to become more prominent; this is in all probability because Major League Baseball had no steroid testing program in effect during this time. During his epic quest to break Ted WilliamsÐÒ home-run record, Mark Maguire was spotted by a reporter to have had a bottle of Androstendione in his locker. Although androstendione is not a steroid, and is simply a prohormone, the word /spanym-buyer, as did demand& and unfortunately, the prevalence of fake or counterfeit steroids.
Steroids remained in the media, occasionally making an appearance when an athlete tested positive, or admitted using them, but for another decade, they remained uncharacteristically out of the medias attention.
In the early part of the new millennium,