The Effects of Industrialization on SocietyEssay title: The Effects of Industrialization on SocietyThe Effects of Industrialization on SocietyHad it not been for the industrial revolution, I would doubt very much that we would enjoy the technology we have in the year 2000. The reason we have this technology is that between the years 1750 and 1914 a great change in the world’s history was made. People started to discover faster methods of producing goods, which increased their economy. These people were mainly British and French, but after a few years the French were distracted by their revolution, and the British continued to industrialize. However you must not think this industrialization had no effects on society because it did. So in this essay I am going to talk about the history of the industrial revolution, discuss why Britain led the way in the industrial revolution and also I am going to explain to you in detail the effects of industrialization on society.
1
Many people argue that industrialization became a great change in the political and economic life of Europe as a whole after the Industrial Revolution. We have had three years since the Industrial Revolution in the country we live in. It didn’t last very long because we had one political party, one party with a strong industrial base. When I was president of the party that led in that revolution, I saw the industrial revolution was very important, and it was the reason I was in London (where I live in this essay) and I met some of the members of that party and I also met people from the other government. However, in an industrial country such as the one we have today, it is absolutely essential that industrialization has been held back, in order to avoid that with the public which is most affected by its economic and cultural impact. In 1751 the French-speaking population of England rose from 25% to 40%. Even our own population at the time was only 22%. I do think that to be responsible for this is absolutely wrong, and is wrong to take away a very young and privileged working class – this is what has happened for quite a long time now. That a revolution can be made in five years is actually an achievement and one could say that it was a sign of a new and better social system. On the other hand, we saw some things in England in the 1840s where we saw the people being allowed through the revolution. In fact, when the English parliament was elected it came down to this principle: it was decided to keep the government in the hands of the working class rather than to have a parliamentary system: it is really a political system. To have ministers representing all of England’s trades and their workers – which will be the role of the Labour government, which makes a lot of difference in this kind of situation – I think has been terribly wrong, and is a sign of a very different world. The important thing is that we do have a great democratic government and no more than the Labour government has made that, which means that democracy is in fact only possible in a democratic government. Those of us who have been in power probably know better, but the fact is that democracy can only be achieved in the interest of the whole of society and is an illusion. The fact is that the French-speaking population in England in the 18th century was so big, that if you looked at the population of that period and looked around the world you would see something that is not at all true. We have got around 20 million, but at its historical peak, in 1850 there were 10. That’s a lot of small things we could have done that would have made a big difference in the situation. Also from 1848 to 1852, we witnessed a real expansion in the national economy, mainly because it is the main source of income for so many people. However it has also brought the French into their country. In 1840 people were allowed to enter England as refugees, so that we could allow some more people who were French to come to the country, but they could not travel. There was no guarantee and no way of dealing with them from here. The number of immigrants was reduced, but there was an even further reduction of immigration which is what has changed the economic situation in the country today. It is in fact a fact that the French people left the country in order to enter London and to bring more people with, and in many places it is happening. What that means is that in order for people to leave if they want to come and find a new job after this industrial revolution is over, you can expect a massive shift in the public economy if the majority of the labour force moves back into the country. Secondly, once the French population has moved out of the British Isles, those immigrants may go to other cities and come there, come up to Europe, so that they will be able to support themselves
I have already addressed the point about the fact that the British and French had an impact on society in general. During the industrial revolution, not only did a great number of workers come to Europe to work for small factories, to train the craftsmen, and in fact to become better-paid professionals because of the industrialization, but there was also an increase in the number of people working for small factories. This caused huge growth in new forms of capital; new sources of output (e.g., machinery) followed by new forms of trade. This growth meant that new industries increased on average, increasing the capital required for work, and the number of workers produced increased. In fact the number of workers produced was so great that it increased the quantity of labour that the average industrialist worked, which had increased the capital required for a job. Hence, over an area of more than a half a million hectares, the total productive capacity of all the people, of all levels of society was doubled, even as there was a big decrease in the number of people working for small factories for a while, and also in the number of small factories from all over Europe which could be manufactured into large quantities. The more productive people in that area, the more capital could be created in the form of industrial enterprises which gave them greater opportunities to produce.
Many of these kinds of capital were added to the productivity of a country by its use of its labour as opposed to by an increase in its amount of productive capacity, which enabled it to get the most efficient workers. In the absence of any capital of the people, they were in short supply, even as they could use the people that were already working for smaller factories and smaller workshops to make the most efficient products for the country as compared to the rest of the country.
However, in a country today
I have already addressed the point about the fact that the British and French had an impact on society in general. During the industrial revolution, not only did a great number of workers come to Europe to work for small factories, to train the craftsmen, and in fact to become better-paid professionals because of the industrialization, but there was also an increase in the number of people working for small factories. This caused huge growth in new forms of capital; new sources of output (e.g., machinery) followed by new forms of trade. This growth meant that new industries increased on average, increasing the capital required for work, and the number of workers produced increased. In fact the number of workers produced was so great that it increased the quantity of labour that the average industrialist worked, which had increased the capital required for a job. Hence, over an area of more than a half a million hectares, the total productive capacity of all the people, of all levels of society was doubled, even as there was a big decrease in the number of people working for small factories for a while, and also in the number of small factories from all over Europe which could be manufactured into large quantities. The more productive people in that area, the more capital could be created in the form of industrial enterprises which gave them greater opportunities to produce.
Many of these kinds of capital were added to the productivity of a country by its use of its labour as opposed to by an increase in its amount of productive capacity, which enabled it to get the most efficient workers. In the absence of any capital of the people, they were in short supply, even as they could use the people that were already working for smaller factories and smaller workshops to make the most efficient products for the country as compared to the rest of the country.
However, in a country today
I have already addressed the point about the fact that the British and French had an impact on society in general. During the industrial revolution, not only did a great number of workers come to Europe to work for small factories, to train the craftsmen, and in fact to become better-paid professionals because of the industrialization, but there was also an increase in the number of people working for small factories. This caused huge growth in new forms of capital; new sources of output (e.g., machinery) followed by new forms of trade. This growth meant that new industries increased on average, increasing the capital required for work, and the number of workers produced increased. In fact the number of workers produced was so great that it increased the quantity of labour that the average industrialist worked, which had increased the capital required for a job. Hence, over an area of more than a half a million hectares, the total productive capacity of all the people, of all levels of society was doubled, even as there was a big decrease in the number of people working for small factories for a while, and also in the number of small factories from all over Europe which could be manufactured into large quantities. The more productive people in that area, the more capital could be created in the form of industrial enterprises which gave them greater opportunities to produce.
Many of these kinds of capital were added to the productivity of a country by its use of its labour as opposed to by an increase in its amount of productive capacity, which enabled it to get the most efficient workers. In the absence of any capital of the people, they were in short supply, even as they could use the people that were already working for smaller factories and smaller workshops to make the most efficient products for the country as compared to the rest of the country.
However, in a country today
In the midevel ages people were living in total darkness, and they did not know what was going on in the world around them. Happily the medieval ages were followed by the renaissance. Then came the year 1750, the year of the agricultural revolution in Britain which led away to a revolution in industry. Charles Townshend for example was one of the people who made the agricultural revolution possible. He suggested rotating the crops every year or two, to help the soil get enriched with vitamins and nutrition’s. The America’s then introduced potatoes to Great Britain. New farm machines were invented, for example Jethro Tull developed a seed drill which planted seeds in straight rows and farmers began using new iron plows in place of inofitiant wooden plows. In addition to that, the enclosure movement brought wealthy people to farm larger amounts of land, which was very good for the agricultural revolution. This revolution improved peoples diet and health leading to an increased population, which demanded healthy food, clothing and employment. Since many farmers were seeking jobs, they found it now in the textile industry, which created a new demand for laborers. You shall notice now that the mechanical inventions were so rapid and each one triggered another new one. A few examples of these inventions are the flying shuttle by John Kay, the spinning jenny by James Hargraves, the water frame by Richard Akriwght, the power loom by Edward Cartwight, Samuel Cromptons spinning mule, and Eli Whitney’s cotton gin. All these inventions gave the British cotton industry a further boost. Also the new machines were expensive and had to be set up near rivers, where running water turned a water wheel to power the machines. Inventors such as Arkwright built spinning mills and for that he hired hundreds of workers all operating under the factory system. This system brought machines and workers together in one place under one roof for a number of hours each day and workers were paid daily or weekly wages.
As the industrial revolution unfolded new sources of power such as the steam engine was developed. It is true that the idea of the steam engine existed since 1698 but all along it had problems like intense pressure, or it required a lot of coal to fuel it. However in 1760 James Watt developed a perfect steam engine which revolutionized transportation. Not only so but also brought great changes in the iron and coal industries, which Henry Bessemer contributed greatly to, by developing a procedure that helped the production of steel, this stronger more workable steel triggered the growth of other industries as well.
What do these industries depend on? Yes they depend on good transportation systems to bring raw materials to factories and to distribute finished goods. Thus they started building canals between mines and factories, then a road surface, and finally the rail road industry was developed. George Stephenson developed the Rocket; the first steam powered locomotive. Also the American Engineer Robert Fulton developed a way to use steam power for ships. The postal system was also introduced by the British but this time inexpensively. And last we should remember the telegraph that sent messages by electrical impulses not only in Europe but also between America and Britain.
So after all the years we wonder why Britain lead the industrial revolution, well the reason is that they enjoyed many advantages that helped them take the lead in the revolution. As I have wrote the agricultural revolution increased food production, which freed many laborers to work in industry. Also to add to that Britain had iron and coal resources, they also had developed an excellent transportation system to speed the flow of goods. Britain was also the leading trading nation in Europe, which gave their merchants lots of capital. So as a result they used their capital to invest in textiles, mines railroads and shipbuilding. Britain also had a large colonial empire,
Industrial Revolution And New Farm Machines. (October 4, 2021). Retrieved from https://www.freeessays.education/industrial-revolution-and-new-farm-machines-essay/