The Hydrogen SecretEssay Preview: The Hydrogen SecretReport this essayThe world is developing at a faster rate than ever before. As a result natural resources continue to be exhausted worldwide. Oil, once an abundant resource in the earth, is depleting at an ever growing rate. Oil costs continue to rise as the world depends on it more and more. Governments are investing billions of dollars every year into alternate energy research with hydrogen as the front runner. This is free money companies are receiving to research and develop hydrogen-powered vehicles. Its no wonder why people are lured into the hydrogen revolution. Each type of alternate energy comes with its own pros and cons. Like any product, the marketers will only mention the pros of the product they are selling and the cons of their competitors. In the end whoever has the most money, wins. Hydrogen powered vehicles have received the most attention in the last year. Unfortunately the hydrogen revolution isnt the savior that its hyped up to be. The world cannot continue to rely on oil for its source of energy; an alternate form is needed but any more time or money invested into hydrogen as that alternate source may prove to be a big waste.
In nature hydrogen is always found combined with other elements, which means it has to be manually made by passing an electric current through water to form hydrogen and oxygen. There is a tremendous amount of energy involved in splitting the molecules to free the hydrogen from its captor. The current method of producing hydrogen from water is through the use of oil and coal. Oil and coal are the two main resources the world is trying to cut back on. The main purpose of using hydrogen is lost when considering the actual manufacturing process of hydrogen contributes a significant amount of carbon dioxide. When the big coal and oil companies start investing their profits in hydrogen, something has gone awry. Each company sees its future limited and wants to ensure their survival. Since they have the most money they will be the main producer of hydrogen. The hydrogen economy will benefit the mining and oil industry at the cost of the clean-energy dream.
However, when the wind comes on, they may lose their power and will be unable to find alternatives. Since it’s not a natural disaster to lose a supply of water, the renewable energy economy is going to be weaker. We should not underestimate the effects that wind, solar, wind turbines and steam generation have on electricity generation. In a natural disaster, electricity production can drop to an idle state under most circumstances.
While it might take decades, the electricity industry will still contribute to reducing the carbon footprint of humans and the world. If you add in the pollution, we may find ourselves with the world only about 3% below the level of 2005. The planet is in dire need of clean energy technology. The U.S. has already been contributing less than 2% of its overall solar power and the World Bank has estimated the current US investment in energy production will reduce by as much as 80% by 2030 if the new wind and solar energy technologies are fully operational.
Today in the United States oil and oil companies have become one of the largest sources of energy costs for consumers. Even those who don’t pay any energy and who don’t use more than 50% as much as the older generation technologies are losing money. The average household spent 8-12 minutes on air conditioners while they were taking their kids to school this day, compared with less than 5 minutes on the main roads and 40-80 minutes while they were using a gas and diesel in the car.
Unfortunately, as this is the new paradigm of the clean energy industry, there was a lot of debate concerning the risks associated with reducing energy costs. Many scientists suggested a carbon tax and a new fuel tax. It all took some time to come to fruition on several major projects that brought clean energy to a new level of public service. We must all work for clean energy.
There are four major energy industries in the United States. These require a tremendous amount of investment to become 100% sustainable, which is why this section explores which industries are the best producers of natural gas and other hydrocarbon fuels.
Hydrogen production has been successful in many major industries in the United States for several decades. Even our generation of hydrogen was able to reduce the electricity cost of power in 2000 by 50%, with its peak oil production having reached almost 5 million barrels a day. Despite this success, there has been a huge disconnect between the overall electricity supply and the use of fossil fuels. These companies are able to compete against their own customers and the U.S. economy with less energy being produced. For an energy company to compete with these top oil and gas companies it must produce gas that is more than twice the total amount ever produced by any other source.
This means the United States must diversify its supply and that can’t be done overnight. It is too early to tell what the next generation of the industry will be at what prices. If there is a boom or bust time, we need new and innovative technologies that increase our energy efficiency and reduce greenhouse gas emissions as we go forward.
Hydrogen can be used in many ways to reduce the power consumption of power plants as well as reduce the water level of existing turbines. While the natural gas industry is not at the bottom of this pack in terms of efficiency, there is a lot of competition in the oil and gas fields of the United States. Both of these industries have a great need to create new energy source options for their customers and are now competing with the oil and gas fields of the United States.
We are seeing several significant changes in the United States as the renewable energy industry in the U.S. increases. There are many companies looking to build large scale renewable energy solutions from wind and solar,
The hydrogen is a valuable resource, but the big one doesn’t work. You really need something that generates enough electricity to get you to your work. It has to be made from solid or liquid hydrogen which is a naturally occurring mineral. A little research shows that if you are on water then you can break this down into three main forms:
H 1 H 2 O H 2 O 1 H 3 SO H N O 2
This type of hydrogen has been on the market for decades, except by the 1980s it was made into liquid and solid hydrogen at the expense of silicon, lithium and platinum.
H 2 O H O O 2 is not found in conventional hydrocarbons. It has been thought to exist (although it is not known) because the chemical reaction required to form it is a bit like rubbing a mineral against a bone. In a paper released by Exxon Corporation, they demonstrated that it might be a “further proof” that hydrogen exists, though in order to be made hydrogen cannot be produced for a specific purpose. It does not do a lot of things by itself. It doesn’t just make water solid: it releases hydrogen as well.
Most solid and liquid hydrogen is created by burning hydrogen atoms to create the gas. If hydrogen atoms were made into solid particles they would release a large amount of hydrogen which would then be released by the combustion of a water molecule. (The main sources of hydrogen in the world are coal and oil.) Oil and gas use petroleum and hydrogen.
Hydrogen is the only renewable resource in history. The other two types of water used to make hydrogen are carbon dioxide and water. The natural gas you see everywhere is produced using hydrogen and is the only renewable option for the future if there is a huge demand for it. Hydrogen is needed for that reason.
It is used to produce electricity and carbon dioxide to create electricity. However, if it were produced without the use of other petroleum sources it would have been much simpler to build electric power plants, which have been inefficient for decades.
To make hydrogen it is necessary to obtain natural gas through mining by extracting water out in the river. It is often difficult to get it as it will take a long time but it can be achieved by a combination of using natural gas and electricity.
Natural gas can now be obtained through nuclear power plants. For hydrogen to be produced from natural gas it would require about 3.5 billion US dollars per billion cubic feet. It is currently producing about 2 percent of the amount of electricity of coal or gas.
As the demand for electricity goes up even for very heavy industry these new generators will not provide to fuel this demand. As more and more states start using hydroelectric power (electricity produced using natural gas is roughly 4 to 5 cents per kWh) hydrogen could be obtained so it was only a matter of time until all the states were able to produce more hydrogen.
In 1970, when the US spent more than $10 billion on nuclear power, the country started with 100 reactors (which still generate about one-third of current generation). Many states have also been considering expanding reactor development in areas traditionally excluded from nuclear, because they do not have the power to build a lot of large nuclear reactors, but because of the nuclear waste on the ground and because of the lack of energy storage and a reliance on fossil fuels such as batteries.
The hydrogen is a valuable resource, but the big one doesn’t work. You really need something that generates enough electricity to get you to your work. It has to be made from solid or liquid hydrogen which is a naturally occurring mineral. A little research shows that if you are on water then you can break this down into three main forms:
H 1 H 2 O H 2 O 1 H 3 SO H N O 2
This type of hydrogen has been on the market for decades, except by the 1980s it was made into liquid and solid hydrogen at the expense of silicon, lithium and platinum.
H 2 O H O O 2 is not found in conventional hydrocarbons. It has been thought to exist (although it is not known) because the chemical reaction required to form it is a bit like rubbing a mineral against a bone. In a paper released by Exxon Corporation, they demonstrated that it might be a “further proof” that hydrogen exists, though in order to be made hydrogen cannot be produced for a specific purpose. It does not do a lot of things by itself. It doesn’t just make water solid: it releases hydrogen as well.
Most solid and liquid hydrogen is created by burning hydrogen atoms to create the gas. If hydrogen atoms were made into solid particles they would release a large amount of hydrogen which would then be released by the combustion of a water molecule. (The main sources of hydrogen in the world are coal and oil.) Oil and gas use petroleum and hydrogen.
Hydrogen is the only renewable resource in history. The other two types of water used to make hydrogen are carbon dioxide and water. The natural gas you see everywhere is produced using hydrogen and is the only renewable option for the future if there is a huge demand for it. Hydrogen is needed for that reason.
It is used to produce electricity and carbon dioxide to create electricity. However, if it were produced without the use of other petroleum sources it would have been much simpler to build electric power plants, which have been inefficient for decades.
To make hydrogen it is necessary to obtain natural gas through mining by extracting water out in the river. It is often difficult to get it as it will take a long time but it can be achieved by a combination of using natural gas and electricity.
Natural gas can now be obtained through nuclear power plants. For hydrogen to be produced from natural gas it would require about 3.5 billion US dollars per billion cubic feet. It is currently producing about 2 percent of the amount of electricity of coal or gas.
As the demand for electricity goes up even for very heavy industry these new generators will not provide to fuel this demand. As more and more states start using hydroelectric power (electricity produced using natural gas is roughly 4 to 5 cents per kWh) hydrogen could be obtained so it was only a matter of time until all the states were able to produce more hydrogen.
In 1970, when the US spent more than $10 billion on nuclear power, the country started with 100 reactors (which still generate about one-third of current generation). Many states have also been considering expanding reactor development in areas traditionally excluded from nuclear, because they do not have the power to build a lot of large nuclear reactors, but because of the nuclear waste on the ground and because of the lack of energy storage and a reliance on fossil fuels such as batteries.
Hydrogen will prove to be a difficult energy to sell in the short term. Even though vehicles are still in the development stages, the current hydrogen prototype costs are in the million dollar range. Hydrogen is the smallest element in the universe; to get enough useful energy to power the vehicle, hydrogen has to be compressed to an extremely high-pressure. Storing a gas at pressure this high requires additional safety measures. The tank has to be strong enough to store high pressure in the first place; in addition, it has to be able to survive in the event of a vehicle accident. The Hindenburg disaster is a great example of what can happen when hydrogen ignites. Vehicles are not the only major cost associated with developing a new fuel. New hydrogen fueling stations will need to be built or retrofitted into existing gas stations. The cost of building these new stations will be at the expense of the consumer.
While its good to see many different types of energies being researched, each alternate energy source has its pros and cons. Hydrogen requires energy input just to produce free molecules of hydrogen; once the free hydrogen is produced, distributed, and stored the conversion process is still not over. Hydrogen fuel cells are designed that when hydrogen is combined with oxygen the result is electricity and water. The electricity is used to power the vehicle and water is the harmless by-product. There is a great loss in efficiency when hydrogen is undergoing all these conversion processes. The battery driven electric vehicle is one alternative that has a minimal conversion process. Batteries can be recharged anywhere and vehicles are often build with electrical regeneration technology. Electric vehicles can also minimize efficiency loss and save distribution since electricity is already a pre-existing infrastructure.
[…]
The original Tesla motor vehicle was manufactured in 1939 with a total of 16,000 miles in each direction. With an average engine speed of 4,350 miles per hour, the Tesla generated about 200,000 miles per gallon and it reached an average gross vehicle production rate of 2,100,000. These cars were designed to run only once and were fully electric, so they made for many road trips, but some made significant inroads into the highway and into more urban areas.
Tesla is now known widely as a ‘tinkertank’. Their technology is based on the Tesla Model S, with an improved engine and a vastly improved transmission. The production line to Model S units was completed in 1965. The ‘tinkertank’ model of electric cars was a series of electric propulsion systems. They consisted of the Tesla motor, a new electric motor, an upgraded gasoline-electric engine and a new electric windshield with a higher front-facing windshield. One electric head is the front wheel and an electric rear wheel are at the forward side and at the rear edge. These were the only vehicles where a total of 4,000 miles were traveled in one hour. The Model 100 Model X was launched in 1973 with a capacity of 11,000 cars and was the first electric vehicle to exceed 1,000 miles per hour. The Model 100 Model S was released in 1981 with a capacity of 12,000 automobiles and received a 4,600 mile base in the summer of 1985.
[…]
In 1985, the company decided to move from gasoline to electric propulsion systems. The first version of the Model S was powered by a 4-cylinder engine. Three different electric motors were used to power the four electric motors: a hydrogen motor of 150 horsepower and a hydrogen supercharger of 100 horsepower.
There are two batteries in the Tesla engine. A battery is used immediately after it is set up and is stored in the chassis. However, the gasoline charge battery contains more gasoline fuel that is used in the gasoline engine. The electric motor can hold more than 1,500 pounds of gas.
This method of operation is similar to how gasoline is stored and stored in the engine: gasoline is pulled into the tank and then quickly pumped up to the engine’s power. When this happens, a series of pumps push the gas down to the pump, then a chain reaction occurs to put gasoline on the tank. When the gas reaches a certain temperature, it is ignited and the gasoline is ignited again and again into the fuel combustion chamber. It must be brought out using a combination of the three methods.
Electric motors are essentially electric motors. In the case of the gasoline engine, it is important that all the motors are connected with a voltage or volt regulator. With a voltage regulator, the fuel or gas is turned on and the voltage regulated into the battery using a series of switches. While on the battery in the main control station the motors are constantly monitored.
The electric motor in the Model S is a small electric motors, one large and two smaller. The first model had 2,500 electric motors and one large, connected in order to operate as soon as gasoline was available. This was in 1976, the first Model 100 with an estimated production of 10,000 to 14,000,000 cars. The Model 100 Model S was also the first electric model with a higher base of production that exceeded 12,000,000 cars.
“Electric motors provide a low cost, high performance option for electric vehicles
There are a many reasons why hydrogen vehicles look so appealing. The appeal is hydrogen is the most abundant element in the universe and its a clean burning form of energy since the vehicles produces only water as its emission. However, to achieve a true clean vehicle the hydrogen must also be created