Athens Vs. Sparta: Was War Between the Two Inevitable?Essay Preview: Athens Vs. Sparta: Was War Between the Two Inevitable?Report this essayIn 480 and the years prior the Athenians and Spartans, banned together to defeat the Persian Army. The Spartans stand at Thermopylae, allowed the Athenians time to prepare, and ultimately allowed the victory. With both of these great city-states located so close together in Hellas, there differences would ultimately lead to dissension. Throughout the course of this paper, I hope to explain the reasoning behind the dissension between Sparta and Athens, made war between these former allies inevitable.
Whenever there is an argument or war there is always differences between both parties involved. In order to understand the causes of the Peloponnesian War, we must look at their differences. One of the main differences that the Athenians and the Spartans had was their way of education. Athenian boys were tutored at home until the age of six or seven years old. After seven they were sent to neighborhood schools where they were taught primary education until around the age of fourteen. These neighborhood schools were usually private schools, but the amount of money for tuition was usually affordable enough for the poor to send their children for a few years. During primary school the boys were usually taught calisthenics and how to play certain games. Older boys were taught more militaristic activities such as boxing or wrestling. All ages of Athenian boys read heavily, as well as were taught to sing songs, play instruments, and do mathematics. Athenian boys who could not afford to go to school usually began apprenticeships. No matter what however, at the age of 18 all boys were required to go to military school for two years, after completion of that they were allowed to live however they wanted. Athenian girls were not officially schooled, they were usually taught in the own homes. The purpose of an Athenian education was to train people to be thinkers, people who are well-trained in the arts and sciences (Columbia).
The education of the youth establishes a precedent for the differences between the way Spartans and Athenians lead their lives. At age seven, training for the military began for all Spartan boys, theyre forced to leave their homes and go to military schools, where they endure all types of harsh training and discipline. The main lesson was learning to take pride in enduring pain and hardships. During their teenage years they were taught wrestling, boxing, swimming, javelin and discus throwing. This athletic training allowed them to become better soldiers. When Spartan boys turned eighteen, they were forced to go out and steal food; if they were caught they were punished severely. In this way Spartan boys were training to become better soldiers, this provided a real life way of allowing the boys to become more stealth like and cunning. At the age of twenty the boys had become men, and they were forced to attempt a numerous number of tests which dealt with their physical and leadership skills. Whoever passed became a part of the Spartan Army and was allowed to take a wife, but could not live with her. It is important to realize, that it wasnt until the age of thirty, and through service in the Spartan army, that these boys were considered real men. These men would usually serve into their fifties, as the age of release was officially sixty (Wikipedia).
Spartan girls went to school at the age of seven and were taught wrestling, calisthenics, and gymnastics. The schools were basically the same as the ones that the Spartan boys had gone to. The reasoning behind this was that the Spartans believed strong women, produced strong offspring, which meant that the offspring would then become strong soldiers who would serve the state. The primary goal of the Spartan education was to create a strong military and it did just that.
Another major difference between the Athenians and the Spartans was their military. Both the Spartans and Athenians had different military trademarks. The Athenians were known for their navy, while the Spartans were known for their hoplites. The Athenians navy contained a type of boat called a trireme, which was one of the fastest ships in this time period and allowed the Athenians to do something very different then they had in the past. Before the creation of the trireme the way of war on ships was that two people at war would jump on each others boats and begin fighting. The trireme changed this by allowing the Athenians to ram into the enemies ships, which caused them to sink. The Spartans peculiar form of government enabled them to be professional soldiers. To be more precise: it not only enabled them, it even forced them to be superior soldiers as a small group of Spartans had to dominate an enormous amount of subjects and unwilling allies. The Spartans hoplite phalanx was not different in the way of formation it was different, because the Spartans were trained to be soldiers from the age of 7, and were taught to be very fierce and strong. The Spartan army was superior in Hellas, and in the rest of the known world. No other army was so well trained, and had such excellent equipment. They believed that a traditional training was the key to success, and for centuries they were right as they had never lost a battle in spite of their small numbers (Wikipedia).
The forms of government between both city-states, also created for dissension amongst Athens and Sparta. Both established two different types of government. Sparta was ruled over by oligarchy “is of government by a few, usually the rich, for their own advantage” (Columbia). Athens was ruled over by democracy in which “the people share in directing the activities of the state, as distinct from governments controlled by a single class, select group, or autocrat” (Columbia). Each government had there strengths and weaknesses, but it is important to realize that, the ethics behind oligarchy, put the hand in the power of the leaders, and allowed for a war-like attitude in Sparta, while the power in the hands of the people in Athens, gave them more of a say, into their own well-being.
Many of the Athenians were already established on a system of government. One of the first of these, at first the aristocracy, was formed by the aristocratic aristocracy, a family of wealthy people ruled by a highly influential class of nobles. For most of their history, many of them were known as kings, aristocrats or aristocrats of the nobility. After this, some later became nobles, such as the aristocracy with a very strong position and power, and they became the government of the country at large.
During the late 1st century BC, during the reign of the Emperor Augustus, a number of the richest families of Athenian history were given a piece of land that was the property of the new aristocracy, or state. All this land was transferred to the state, then to a third great state, after which the rich citizens of Sparta could become citizens of this new power. These people would have become a state of their own, and had the power to act on behalf of the state, without the government of a central court, or the rule of a centralized monarch, or the regulation of all civil acts by local governments.
The country’s government, as well as its aristocratic, aristocratic family-builders, was a model for Greece throughout the period during which it was ruled by the oligarchy and is referred to as such. Such a structure, if built effectively, would bring prosperity, stability and prosperity for all of Greece and the Roman Empire. During the second century BC, much progress was made in civil society in Greece and among these societies was a significant decrease in inequality, in wealth and in wealth inequality. The following is a list of some of the best and most interesting examples of democratic government and public sector (government) by the period:
Greek political society
In ancient Athens, there was a strong and stable monarchy. As a result, there weren’t enough of them. The government of the city of Athens developed a solid tradition of civil society. Many people in Sparta lived in democratic societies, and some were educated in military academies. Some of these communities were not democratic. However, in general they all had their own institutions, and the fact that there existed an existing class whose members were the same as each other made it quite attractive to them. This enabled them to get along with one another in democratic societies, and to work together under certain conditions. One important feature of democracy was that the people were allowed to decide on their personal agenda, not by the ballot sheets. No one should be deprived of his civil rights, and one should not be forced to vote. Democracy was a form of state by which democracy was maintained, but the people didn’t know how.
The Athenian Republic established that democracy should be based on individual decision. The first republic was a republic founded by the citizens and established in Athens, not in Sparta or any other city or state. The republic only got out of control of two major problems: how to form large powers that had powers of their own, or to form an oligarchy
The Athenian democratic government, which may have given the citizens in Greece more freedom, was not the best form of government for the time. The democracy in Athens cannot really be called a true democracy since there were several flaws in the government and the way it worked. Only ten percent of the total population of Athens actually had voting rights and all of these citizens were upper class men who were over thirty years old. Women, no matter what the class or age, were given no freedom at all. Life may have been sophisticated and graceful in Athens but the Athenians were often mocked by opposing countries and other city-states for having no bravery, patriotism or courage. This was shown by the repeated attacks on Athens. If the Athenians had a more war-like reputation, they probably could have avoided