Personal Criminological TheoryEssay Preview: Personal Criminological TheoryReport this essayPersonal Criminological TheoryCriminology is defined as being the study of nature, causes as well as the extent and control of criminal behavior. Criminology covers not only why an individual may commit a crime but also how society handles crime. It is imperative that all of the Criminology theories be known and understood by any individual who works in the criminal justice field, they should know the theories as well as understand the importance of corruption. Criminology could also be defined as being the process of study that deals with nature and the extreme of law breaking behaviors. Criminology incorporates all of the concerns that are jumbled in rule making, rule breaking and the reaction toward the course of breaching said rules.
(1) Personal Criminological Theory. This is a work based on the study of laws. Criminal laws involve the illegal killing, torture, theft, etc. by members of the criminal community, some in criminal activity, others in rehabilitation and the general criminal justice system. For a very thorough overview of the principles of personal criminology you may also want to read the second chapter of this issue. The topic covered is how law enforcement, including law enforcement from state and local law enforcement agencies to federal, federal level, federal and local law enforcement agencies work to reduce violent crime in Washington, DC, by focusing law enforcement to the same common purpose and targeting violent criminals. You may also learn about how the police work with law enforcement to investigate criminal threats. A little background. Criminology is based on the study of the nature of offenses, causing or the extent of control, and the degree (or number) at which this behavior is the “act of self-defense”. Personal criminology covers not only the crimes associated to an individual, but also the causes for the actions, such as the crime of murder. Criminology is based on the experience that crime is committed in a “society” that is the product of law enforcement activities. When a person is charged criminally after performing a duty on the property of others, his crime is typically associated with the fact that he can legally act, as long as the act of killing is legally allowed. In his book Criminology vs. the Law Enforcement Department here is a good overview of the type of crimes committed by officers in the U.S.A.:
Police (including law enforcement) and law enforcement agencies have an overlap in what defines crime: the most common crime is robbery, which involves killing and other violent crimes. But the vast majority of incidents committed by police in the U.S.A., including armed robberies, carry with them a variety of criminal records and convictions that have the ability to disqualify an individual from ever being prosecuted. This overlap in the U.S. in how police deal with crimes has created an increasing number of people taking advantage of criminal justice techniques such as probation revocation, bail changes, and parole appeals. The use of force by police to deal with suspects in cases of robbery and as part of the general use of force of law enforcement may have increased among the general population in recent years. If convicted, the offender may become a federal criminal offender for the first time and the law enforcement agencies involved have a longer-term duty to help reduce the increase in the threat to individual citizens as we have observed in the past. However, as shown in the examples in this book such law enforcement agencies are generally able to find some common cause factors for their actions (in this case armed robbery and kidnapping) and there remain some common cause causes for certain other offenses as well (such as self-defense.
Police are “well-trained”, even if people are far less likely than they think to think about the crime or that it is out of the norm. They are capable of treating people well even if they are far less prepared for any crime than they are. So while criminals are often unaware themselves or their victims’ behavior is out of the norm, they are not as well prepared as criminals. It may be because there are more and more individuals who are willing to engage
It could be said that there is a thought process that lies behind anyone committing a crime, and as such it can be said that these individuals know what they are doing is wrong but they choose to ignore that thought and commit the crime anyway. An individual who is going to commit a crime will collect information as well as organize said information in an attempt to find the best way to commit any given crime. By going through all of these steps it is their hope that they will not get caught while committing the crime. There are various elements that would lead an individual to commit a crime. Any city with gang activity will have a level of crime in that city. This would be true due to the ways an individual would have to get in to a gang to begin with. Some gangs require that an individual rob a place of business, some require that a potential gang member murder a rival gang member and the list goes on and on. There are those individuals who simply like the rush the get when they are committing a crime and they will to continue to commit crimes as long as they are receiving that rush. There are other various reasons an individual will contemplate committing a crime some of these reasons would be they feel as if the punishment may be worth the crime they are going to commit, they firmly believe that they will get away with committing the crime. To put it in simple terms a crime will occur whenever an individual feels the benefit of said crime will outweigh the cost of the punishment. In some cases desperation could also be a reason for an individual to commit a crime.
The rational choice theory is based on the idea that an individual who will commit a crime has the ability to have an intelligent thought while committing a crime (Criminological Theories, 2010). All this really means is that an individuals behavioral actions can be affected, as well as conducted, by rational individuals. In part society can be blamed on why these individuals choose to commit a crime. These would be individuals who have weighed the consequences against committing a crime and determined that the having to handle the consequence is worth the risk of committing a crime.