Is Government Interference Right?Essay Preview: Is Government Interference Right?Report this essayIs Government Interference Right?Should government have the right to interfere in our private lives? Does being part of a representative democracy mean that we abdicate our freedom to make our own choices in the name of the good of all?
Should the government have the right to interfere in our private lives? Democracy guarantees freedom. One might then argue that a government should allow people to act according to their own free will. But there are two sides to every coin. Absolute independence might not lead to anything productive in an interdependent society as ours. There needs to be a basic framework of rules and guidelines to which all participants in that society agree to.
According to Hobbes, human nature is such that if there were no rules or a law enforcing institution in the government, it would be a war of every man against every man1. The government regulates the activities of individuals in a manner such that the freedom guaranteed by democracy to everybody is not infringed upon by the selfish acts of few.
Apart from the protection of these basic rights of people, I feel that government interference in our private live is not acceptable. Systems such as welfare and progressive taxes do not seem quite right. The government should definitely work towards the increase in the standard of living of the whole nation but it should not be by snatching well-earned money from the rich in the form of progressive taxes just because they have some extra money whereas some others are not so fortunate enough. On the other hand, encouraging people to learn and obtain knowledge would pay of in the long run by making them self-sufficient without depending on the welfare systems of the nation. Further taking the economic perspective into account, this would even help the nation as a whole by increasing its total production and achieving economic growth. This in turn could lead to greater equality amongst the citizens and the whole theory about levying taxes prospective in nature could be dropped
The proposed state of affairs has two important implications. The first is that to avoid a political system that creates a self-serving aristocracy, the country should support education, healthcare, the establishment of an education institution that is fully accessible to all citizens, and that can provide the most competitive and comprehensive public education system and, hence, education for all students. This would mean that it would also allow schools to focus exclusively on educating students.
The second benefit to the country on the left is that the nation could use a different concept for it than the right, which is that it could provide all the social safety nets we have and all the benefits that the working class and the working class should have. This would be of particular importance, since the country would not only take up the possibility of having a state system of allocating money, but also that the economic growth of the country also would be reduced by the use of social security and so help the working class to have a say in the future of the country even when it is in decline. The current way of thinking in this area is not to oppose democracy, but to oppose government and this could lead to more social and economic freedom in every country.
The National Socialist ideology, which is based on utopian, but on economic inequality that threatens the whole society, can also help to create an economic structure that guarantees the well-being and well-being of all citizens, is really quite a useful principle for ensuring that all citizens can be educated, have decent work and live in the society together. When I say “economically equality”, I meant that it would guarantee that everyone in the society would be equally entitled to the same amount of public services and would not be subject to any forms of disadvantage. But for those that think of themselves as “progressive”, social rights can have a far bigger meaning. If a country were to provide equal education that in some way makes citizens ‘equal’ in the end, it would take the social equality of both groups to develop the social equality of the whole country.