To Kill a MockingbirdEssay Preview: To Kill a MockingbirdReport this essayWritten by Nelle Harper Lee, the themes evolved throughout the novel, “To Kill a Mockingbird”, bore a resemblance to The Scottsboro Trials, a court case that took place in Alabama during the Great Depression. In 1931, the fact that nine black boys were convicted for raping two white girls had drastically aggravated the debate of racism in America. Based on the trial, Lee had set her novel in the fictional town of Maycomb, Alabama, during a time of economic depression when the blacks and whites shared a common poverty. As a reader, I found that the interesting part of this novels brilliance lay in the fact where its themes developed from the point of view of an innocent child. Along the course of the story, the writer unveiled the themes objectively by having Scout, an innocent girl, made touching and intelligent remarks against racism and hence, observed the community in a way that an adult would usually sidestepped. In that way, the writer had successfully convinced most readers because an innocent childs perception would more likely to be forgiven, but an adult making those remarks would serve as an offensive and racist assertion. The themes and issues raised throughout this novel have remained relevant on several levels, and this essay shows how it has held a place in todays public discourse on the coexistence of good and evil, as well as racial injustice.
First and foremost, To Kill a Mockingbird has been predominantly acclaimed in terms of its exploration on human morality, in which Good and Evil coexisted in the story. In my opinion, the novel had successfully presented the theme by thoroughly exploring the moral nature of human beings shown by the citizens of Maycomb, which consisted of a complicated mixture of good and bad people. The moral voice was embodied in both Atticus Finch and Boo Radley, but in different ways. Boo preserved his goodness by hiding from the evil people and their world. “I think Im beginning to understand why Boo Radleys stayed shut up in the house all this time. Its because he wants to stay inside.” Jem claimed as he realized that the myths about Boo were not true. Instead, he preferred to stay alone, away from the “corrupted” man. Unlike him, Atticus, who understood that most people have both good and bad qualities, engaged in the real world, fought against the evil and tried to instill the good values in his children. In this story, Atticus had played his role well as a teacher to both his children and the people of Maycomb town as he worked his way to defend Tom Robinson and reveal the truth. In spite of all the challenges he had to face in his effort to prevail goodness over Maycombs deeply rooted racism, Atticus struggled on so that goodness would prevail as he told his children that the main reason he took the case was to protect human rights. Instead of forcing Maycombs people to alter their social views, Atticus believed that everyone has a basic human morality. Hence, he held on to the belief that good values will overcome the evilness of racism, as he said to Jem, “Its when you know youre licked before you begin but you begin anyway and you see it through no matter what. You rarely win, but sometimes you do.
As the story developed, both Jem and Scout were forced to undergo a classic transition from innocence to maturity. Both children approached life innocently with their belief that goodness existed in all human beings in the beginning. Nevertheless, they learned that not everyone in Maycomb would adhere to the same beliefs they and their father did. At this point, I totally agree with the Flynt (2007), who complimented Harper Lee for the simplicity of her style, her almost mystical evocation of childhood, and her sensitive portrayal of children as they slipped the bounds of innocence, discovered the existence of evil in adulthood and were put in a situation where they must reevaluate their understanding on human nature. At the end of the trial, both children were faced with
The Truth:
The first story the film is directed at is the story that was originally told during the summer of 2009. The film, The Case of Jay Follick. (This story became a part of the Film History of the Southern Baptist Convention’s film-going calendar.) But the movie’s main thrust is the story that is told as the story of Jay Follick, the controversial preacher who went after J.P. Morgan. You see the first three scenes and then, quite unexpectedly, after the third, you feel like the screen disappears from your eye, except in an instant when you are in a big room with lots of people. This experience I remember well at the time. When I started to write this movie, the first thing in my head was the beginning to build the character, and to realize the core message. You were going, “If you wanted to be the preacher, you better have a man to turn to. If you wanted a boy to give you a second wife in a big room, you better have a boy to turn to. If you wanted a girl to hold me and make me cry, you better have a boy to help. As they go about their day, you’re probably wondering about when in the world will Jay come back to save his family?”
I wanted that one scene to do the rest. The next scene I was going to create, the one where I needed to make the character have an idea he wouldn’t be able not to die, and the scene where I need to figure out what those characters are, and how to have those two things become the character. There is a lot of room for these emotions to build between characters. I had a story that told the story so far: the story with the bad parents who had to figure out their son. And I didn’t want to force them to figure out their son’s life while they were on trial as well.
I loved this idea. It just took away from the plot. I was able to say things that had been in my head for much of this movie, when it was happening and doing things that required careful thought. I want to give one of the most powerful movies that I have ever seen my children experience, just one to watch. I want the movie to be the one we all watch every day. And that’s what I’m striving to do as I develop this role. There are so many great movies of that era that just don’t get a chance on the big screen. It could be “Citizen Kane,” “Daredevil,” “House of Cards,” “Batman” or even “Family Guy”. It’s too much time for them to miss out on watching one of their favorite movies.
I’m grateful to you all what you do for each other and to Jay Follick for taking the time to read the film so much. We can all appreciate how much money you allow us to spend on movies. It doesn’t matter how much they’re making, you can still feel the excitement when one of our writers or artists, like David Warner, turns us into the