The Greatest Players of All TimeEssay Preview: The Greatest Players of All TimeReport this essayThe Greatest Players of All Time*In recent history American culture has become more and more dominated by sports. Out of all of these sports baseball is considered to be AmericaÐŽ¦s pastime. Over the last couple years AmericaÐŽ¦s pastime has come under scrutiny about some of its players using anabolic steroids and other performance enhancing drugs. In an interview with Sports Illustrated, Major League Baseball commissioner Bud Selig said, ÐŽ§ hopefully we can figure out ways to solve this problem. It needs to be solved. There is no one IÐŽ¦ve talked to who can say it is not a problem. Now the question is, What can we do about it?ÐŽÐ (41). The commissioner is absolutely correct in saying that the steroids issue is a problem. Without a doubt the steroid issue is bringing the integrity of the game into question.
This steroid problem reaches farther than one might think. ÐŽ§This issue was drawing so much interest President Bush mentioned it in last yearÐŽ¦s State of the Union addressÐŽÐ (Random and off season). If the President of the United States feels that this is a big enough problem to mention in his State of the Union address, then this problem effects all Americans. Another way it effects all Americans is that US tax dollars are being used by the federal government to investigate the players who have been accused of using anabolic steroids. Finally, the steroid problem effects anyone who is a sports fan because these are the sports stars of our generation. If all of their accomplishments are negated by steroids, then we will have no one to represent our generation.
I have been watching sports, including baseball, for almost my entire eighteen years of living. When I was little I played baseball and wanted to grow up and be just like the players I saw on the television. I also collected hundreds of baseball cards all through my childhood. Through all of this I have become very knowledgeable on the game of baseball. To see steroids challenge the integrity of the game deeply concerns me.
The reaction of many people is to find all of the people who have used steroids and ban them from the game and the record books. These players are cheaters and do not deserve to hold records, be hall of famers, or even continue playing the game. By allowing these players to go unpunished, society is setting a bad example for the youth of America who admire these sports icons. Accomplishments of players decades ago are being falsely smashed by these athletes who are being assisted by illegal, performance enhancing drugs.
I do agree that the players who are using anabolic steroids are cheaters. It is sad that great accomplishments and records set by honest players are being smashed by juiced up athletes. In his Sports Illustrated column Rick Reilly states, ÐŽ§I believe Barry Bonds should go straight to the Hall of Fame, too, even though I know that heÐŽ¦s a cheater and that the second half of his career was as phony as Cheez WhizÐŽÐ (118). I also sympathize with players who are playing the game honestly only to be outdone by dishonest players. The youth of America cannot be shown that cheating is bad, but it is also okay and you can get away with it.
If these players arenÐŽ¦t going to be totally axed from the game, record books, and hall of fame then we should let the world and future generations know that there is an asterisk next to these accomplishments. ÐŽ§That asterisk would say: Records are in question because of widespread use of anabolic steroidsÐŽÐ (Verducci 38). This way we are punishing cheaters while not totally obliterating their accomplishments. Players who have played the game honestly will see the accomplishments of dishonest players marred by this historical asterisk. The youth of America will learn from this that there is no honor in cheating. Let all the people today and of future generations know that this era of inflated numbers and hall of famers is under scrutiny of widespread anabolic steroid use.
The Official OJ Rule (CSA) of the NCAA is a set of guidelines that governs the eligibility of college athletes. In this document, the word “accused” has been added to “non-credible” (“not an independent expert”) with an asterisk. Since 2002, the NCAA has made significant changes to the Rules. The list of changes and penalties for violation of the OJ Rule are available here.
The NCAA has issued two rule changes to make sure college men who violated the NCAA’s rules are never punished or even prosecuted by any professional athletic system or for non-compliance with the original OJ Rule. These rule changes are made using the criteria described above.
•In 2000, college players had the right to choose a university. If an athlete is determined to be a non-compliance, they may be punished for any of the following actions—be it through expulsion, suspension, or a “felony” lawsuit—within a seven-month period.
•1. In the future, the NCAA may not allow a player or group of players to exceed $100,000 for non-performance periods without first obtaining a state-issued NCAA-registered player-meter.
•2. The NCAA may not expel any college player because of any violation of its OJ Rule. There are two ways to avoid receiving the sanction:1. By filing a state-issued national compliance report and being required to receive a copy before all of the punishments are assessed.2. By enrolling in a university course and completing the program, and using the “professional” system by which they will become an official member of the NCAA. Students who fail these tests will be subject to penalties of up to $250 for non-compliance with the NCAA’s guidelines.
•3. The NCAA will not issue an official sanction for use of any illegal substance at a university or college. They must obtain a “felony” lawsuit and complete the program within 6 months after the final “accident” notification and must file a lawsuit within three months with the NCAA. Any violations of NCAA policies must only be punished prior to the end of the academic year.
•4. For the first time since the NCAA’s inception in 2000, the NCAA will not require certain players to get their numbers changed before the 2014–15 academic year. As outlined in the NCAA’s original rules, “Non-accused” students with a valid NCAA student-entrance-required score in the NCAA’s 2014–15 academic year must obtain and file a NCAA-recognized “professional” student-entrance required by Title III Student Code. Any non-noncompliant student who obtains the professional required number from the NCAA within the past seven years can claim exemption from the provisions of this Rule.
I understand that anyone opposed to putting an asterisk in the records books and in the hall of fame would say that this is not enough. These players cheated, and cheaters should be totally wiped out of the game just as Pete Rose was for betting on baseball. Rick Reilly expresses this opinion when he says, ÐŽ§Hey, at least he (Barry Bonds) didnÐŽ¦t cheat like Pete Rose by betting on his team several times to win. Now that will kill a sport.ÐŽÐ While I recognize that players who used steroids are cheaters, they cannot be removed entirely from the game because that would destroy an entire generation of baseball.
Instead of destroying an entire generation of baseball I suggest that we place an asterisk