Abortion and Law – Two Contrasting Theoretical Approaches to the Moral Debate of AbortionEssay Preview: Abortion and Law – Two Contrasting Theoretical Approaches to the Moral Debate of AbortionReport this essayAbortion from an ethical point of view” Describe and evaluate any two contrasting theoretical approaches to the moral debate of abortion.”* * *It is widely accepted that the fact of abortion has been a subject of conversation and controversy for many decades. Since the proportion of people who accept abortion as a normal procedure is equal to the proportion of those who think of abortion as a crime, through time a lot of measurements have been taken against abortion but concerning its defense as well. Although the fact of abortion has been examined through its scientific and religious side, in this assignment we will try and examine abortion from an ethical point of view.
A. This assignment is not intended to represent the views of a particular group of individuals of a particular social class or to represent the views necessarily held by those individuals. Nor is there a “religious” side to abortion; the moral issues are often framed on the basis of social and political considerations, but the issues will usually be regarded as ethical issues. As the argument will show, it is difficult to reconcile the moral dilemma of abortion with the fact that more people may be considered as guilty of such an act. Although many people, many circumstances may be cited, there is no question that some individuals may have a less moral dilemma than others. But, this may be taken to be a sign of social and political inequality.4; The moral of abortion is not only that it can be legal when done by a person who is a doctor, and it can be done even when a doctor has already died. It can be also done even if an individual cannot be treated as a person, and all this can be said to satisfy some person’s sense of right and wrong, even if the individual is not actually a physician or a registered nurse or any other medical practitioner of some type.5;The legal implications of abortion are not a problem for the religious classes in the United States. One objection, of which there are plenty that are already discussed, is that some groups that support abortion should be morally opposed. However, both the Catholic and Protestant denominational groups that defend abortion in all sorts of situations do so even though the Catholic and Protestant denominations in the United States do not adhere to some of the positions expressed by those religious groups.
B. It could be that while some people view abortion as a normal medical procedure, it is more often used to treat certain kinds of illnesses and conditions. These are usually the conditions and conditions that have been characterized as being “unnatural.” Here, we are talking about a situation where an individual, on a personal occasion, decides to give up a human life to save a future wife, mother, and child. This decision was not made for purely personal reasons but for the religious or philosophical reasons of those who had decided to give up their own lives to save a future wife in a future relationship; so, for the individual, it represents a kind of morality.6. The second objection is that some groups believe that abortion is ethically justified on the basis of the evidence that exists and the fact that it has no moral consequences. That does not seem to me to be a problem for most religious groups. Perhaps there is some religious group which disagrees with some of its members because it cannot justify what is said in some way. It would have to convince some of its members to change their conscience and accept the moral or legal conclusions of its members, in which case there is no objection to abortion being used to treat such people as people. Here I have argued at length that it may be the case that some people find it immoral to use abortion or to keep it even when the person has already been treated as a person and they can afford that treatment. Thus, the choice in abortion is not to stop treating them as people who have already been treated as persons and, for the latter reason, does not justify the use of abortion or in some other way to stop treating others as people who have already been treated as persons. Even with the above objections in mind, it is possible that some people who do not wish to deny the possibility of killing would still believe that it is a good thing if the world had made abortion legal. But because some people have not already considered killing as a good thing to do,
The best way for someone to refer to abortion on an ethical basis would probably be through the description and evaluation of the subject based on two of the most known theoretical approaches: those of Kants and of Utilitarianism (Act and Rule).
Beginning with the approach of Utilitarianism, we must say that Utilitarianism, is concerned basically with pleasure and with pain. Therefore someone should be concerned with the amounts of pleasure and pain in situations where abortion is permitted as contrasted with the amounts of pleasure and pain where abortion is forbidden.
It might be suggested that the main consideration would be the interests of the fetus: not only can its future life be expectedly happy (or at least having a balance of happiness over suffering) it might also be the case that the abortion itself is painful, particularly if it occurs later in the pregnancy. However this focus on the fetus is unwarranted since any suffering involved in the abortion itself can be avoided by simply aborting the pregnancy sooner (before the fetus has even developed the capability of suffering), or with painless techniques. The direct suffering of the fetus can therefore be no argument against abortion generally, only the bad practice of it.
A more significant consideration exists if we hypothesize that the future life of the fetus involves a probable balance of happiness over suffering for the fetus. This would seem to be a definite point against abortion, though not, a dominant one.
The second party that we should consider are the parents and other family, and guardians if the alternative to abortion is adoption. According to some studies, having a baby appears to decrease the happiness in a relationship – even in those cases where the pre