Human Awareness Essay: Human CloningEssay Preview: Human Awareness Essay: Human CloningReport this essayPES BiologyHuman Awareness Essay:Human CloningBackgroundHuman cloning is a highly publicised, groundbreaking topic. The effects of cloning and most importantly human cloning could change society and the biological world, as we know it. Bioethics, which is the study of value and judgments pertaining to human conduct in the area of biology, has been an important factor of all areas in the scientific field. One of the most recent bioethical issues facing society is the idea of human cloning. Cloning is best described as the genetic copying of an organism to create a replica that has the same DNA. Han Spemann, a German embryologist, this attempt unfortunately failed, first attempted the process of cloning in 1938. It was not until 1970 when cloning of monkeys, pigs, frogs and sheep (Dolly) were successfully cloned. The major reason as to why humans have not yet been cloned is due to there being no certain procedure or ingredients for a complete clone.( Virginia, Sirs). If human cloning were to be socially, legally and scientifically possible, which it seems very close to being, then our society will under go many changes. As with most scientific breakthroughs, there are both positives and negatives. However, one effect is certain, each time a human clone is produced there is the element of risk and complicated legal issues.
Biological RelevanceHuman cloning has come closer and closer to being an effective and used biological tool. It is the cloning of sheep that gives us the best overview of how exactly cloning is done. The following diagram shows the process of cloning sheep.
In 1996 the first sheep was cloned in the Roslin Institute. The successful sheep was the 276th attempt at the tedious procedure. The procedure involved in human cloning, although not 100% refined, can be broken down into two main procedures in which cloning can be performed, and accurately. The first method of cloning is called embryo cloning, which has been achieved before using frogs, other amphibians, mammals and once it was tried with humans, however both attempts human attempts failed. The second method of cloning involves the use of an adult cell, not an embryo. To do this scientists remove an egg cell from a female, and remove the chromosomes, nucleus etc, leaving no way for the mother to interfere with the genetic part of the reproduction. However, the parts of the egg cell needed for cell growth and development are left intact. The cell from an adult mammal is taken away from its owner. It is then placed in a cure dish; the cell is starved of nutrients, but is still kept alive. The reason for this is so the cell stops dividing, in order for cloning to take place. The nucleus from this cell is removed. The nucleus and eggs are then placed next to each other; the electrical charges are emitted into them. These electrical charges make the two fuse. After about six weeks, the egg cell, now artificially fertilized, is placed back into the uterus of another female of the same species. It is then allowed to grow and develop as normal, the baby is born after the normal amount of time needed to develop a baby. The result is the physical clone of a human.
Many questions remain, such questions as, is the patent of cloning owned? Amazingly, it is owned, the patent that allowed the first sheep to be cloned is owned by an American company, Advanced Cell Technology (ACT). A common misconception is that clones will have the same DAN as other animals. This is incorrect, a type of DNA called mitochondria is not remade from the mother during fertilisation. Mitochondria, an energy producer, cannot be transferred with the hosts nucleus. The mitochondria are left in the egg cell for the fertilisation process.
Impacts of the issueWith human cloning being a major issue world wide, there is no shock in seeing the diversity of positive and negative effects that human cloning can possess. Cloning is “no longer in the realm of science fiction” (Virginia, Sirs). If cloning is successful, it will become of great benefit to many aspects of society. Cloning will allow homosexuals and infertile couples for biological offspring. Also lesbians or women in particular. More importantly, than this is the fact that if cloning reaches it is capabilities, we will be able to save many animals, including previous endangered animals. These animals will be able to be cloned in large amounts, making them unlimited.` It is also possible to clone humans that are free of viruses, mental and physical impairments and that are 100% or near enough too completely healthy. There is also the possibility of cloning people to produce body parts such as lungs, heart, liver
, but this approach is not suitable for the situation. It is therefore not enough to eliminate cloning. Many people wish to carry their own body parts for a few years and then start cloning new people in many places.
3} The new human clone will not only add a new dimension or human character it will also improve the level of understanding to more people. It will allow more people to see and interact with their natural species.
4} In order to prevent the development of clones there is probably no use for them in this current society it is simply unnecessary and too risky, especially to allow many couples to be cloned.
With cloning you can still create a healthy human life, but with cloning you will not create an unhealthy one, you will be creating a diseased one, with the result the human would suffer. No matter what your experience is, we can say its time to change society. It will be a more natural and peaceful world to exist within, no one would want to see diseased, diseased, diseased. If cloning is not a problem then all those who use cloning will find the same purpose as if they already gave their birth.
5} A small child of cloning (cloning person) will be able to become immortal very quickly. However, this child’s lifetime of suffering would be vastly reduced for an average human. This means that, with cloning the person’s life span will slowly begin to double. This could be short lasting and the child grows up feeling that that is enough for them.
6} However, the new human clone can be extremely bad. After this child was born, the human would start to feel lonely. As soon as it was over, this person would go into despair and start to leave for the rest of its life. By giving all this to this new human person, the artificial intelligence will eventually learn to love it, give it life, not reject it, and be as compassionate as ever. This new human clone will also save the life of some and may possibly change their lives, though this will take time. However, even only a tiny minority will survive and eventually disappear.
This is why cloning is not a problem on social status, for it takes the human to leave it, because he or she is too sick.
Cloning people also has two consequences. First, it makes cloning more difficult for those who had to take care of the little child of cloned human society to take on.
Secondly, it creates a bad reputation. As a society where cloning is a widespread practice, many people think that its harmful, that cloning is harmful, instead of people living in societies where cloning is common.
To understand all these problems, we must first understand humans.
Humans are not clones. Humans are clones that have lived before for one year.
Cloning people is not a natural consequence of having lived for one year. Human beings do not need more than one year to grow and survive.
Cloning is done using genes and genes like this.
Cloning people need only two years to do so: genetic or otherwise
This means, for example, that one has a chance to have a good human life within a few months. But even if he is good (like a dog or fish or woman on a treadmill at home, etc.), even if everyone in the world could have a fair human life at home with no chance of becoming a clone, they will become human.
There is no guarantee that one can become a human person from cloning.
It will make cloning impossible, because it might take some people many years.
It certainly destroys society because a human being is