A Supermarket in California” and “constantly Risking Absurdity
Essay Preview: A Supermarket in California” and “constantly Risking Absurdity
Report this essay
“A Supermarket in California” and “Constantly Risking Absurdity”
Allen Ginsbergs poem “A Supermarket in California” and Lawrence Ferlinghettis poem “Constantly Risking Absurdity” describe the struggle within to find beauty and self worth. Where Allen Ginsberg is lost in the market, desperately trying to find inspiration from Walt Whitman, Lawrence Ferlinghetti portrays the image of the poet frantically trying to balance on a high wire, risking not only absurdity, but also death. Both of these poems deal with their poets struggle to find meaning and their fears of failure. Where Ginsberg fears he will never find Whitmans dream, Ferlinghetti fears falling off the high wire and being submitted to absurdity and death.
In the beginning of Allen Ginsberg “A Supermarket in California”, Ginsberg comes to the supermarket, having a headache and being fatigued. This illustrates his physical and psychological exhaustion. Searching for inspiration or something that will clinch his thrust, it appears to him in the form of his mentor and hero, Walt Whitman. Ginsberg describes him as a sad lonely old man–an image displaying Whitmans style of poetry in modern America, lost within a distorted view of what Whitman dreamed America would become (Analysis of “A Supermarket in California”). Ginsberg, with the help of Walt Whitman, is trying to find his way home, just like Odysseus odyssey for Ithaca. Ginsbergs home is an openly tolerant society with spiritual orientation to the world. “Where are we going, Walt Whitman? The doors close in an hour. Which way does your beard point tonight?” In these lines, Ginsberg is turning toward Whitman for guidance, only to find that Whitman himself is incoherent to his surroundings. He is seen as the old ways, obsolete to an artificial mass produced America. Ginsberg is left, homeless and in despair. Readers last see Walt Whitman on a smoky bank, staring back at his dream of America across Lethe (the river of forgetting), a forgotten dream in modern society which Ginsberg is frantically trying to discover (Ginsberg).
To clarify Ginsbergs struggle, one must first understand Walt Whitman and his relationship to Ginsberg. Whitman viewed America as open, democratic, tolerant, accepting, ever-questioning, and grand in scale (Miller). Many of Walt Whitmans poems have outdoor settings that symbolize his vision of a free open-minded America. Ginsberg decides to portray an opposite setting than Whitmans poems in order to show how Whitmans dream is not present in todays society. A society, as Tyrus Miller claims, is “an era of anti-Communist witch hunts, preprocessed food, television advertising, and nuclear bombs.” Ginsberg is inspired by Walt Whitmans dream of a diverse society. Although he is inspired, Ginsberg clearly lacks the confidence in himself and modern America to achieve this dream. He has many fears and displays them in numerous ways. The supermarket itself is a clausphobic environment, where store staff and imaginative detectives closely survey every move of the poet as he searches. In Whitmans poems, there is an image of work and production, while Ginsbergs poems show spending of money and consuming. In “Song of Myself” by Walt Whitman, he describes a butcher boy cutting meat in a market. While Ginsbergs poem centers around a supermarket, where everything is prepackaged and ready to buy. This accentuates Ginsbergs fear of a non tolerable society. His run in with Garcia Lorca, a Spanish poet who also admired Walt Whitman, is one of shock and fright. Garcia Lorca was killed by rebels during the Spanish Civil War, a fellow poet who died searching for Whitmans dream. His discovery of Garcia is one of disbelief, “and you, Garcia Lorca, what were you doing down by the watermelons?” Garcias presence in this poem is intended to show the fate of those who fall off the high wire, foreshadowing the fate of Ginsberg if he does not succeed in his search (Miller).
In the poem “Constantly Risking Absurdity,” Lawrence Ferlinghetti gives readers a visual of an acrobat walking a high wire and compares it to a poet writing a poem. There must be a truth and realism for the poet to capture beauty and such truth can put the poet at a direr threat of absurdity. Absurdity is defined as the condition or state in which humans exist in a meaningless, irrational universe wherein peoples lives has no purpose or meaning (www.dictionary.com). In the first lines, “Constantly risking absurdity and death” Ferlinghetti puts absurdity before death, pointing out the poets strong opinion that life without meaning or purpose is far worst than death. At the same time the degree of truth that the poet must use to capture the beauty which he seeks to portray in his poem can put him on a high wire, desperately trying to balance truth over absurdity (Analysis of “Constantly Risking Absurdity”).
While the meaning of “Constantly Risking Absurdity” is seen through the text, Ferlinghetti does a remarkable job of not only giving the meaning of his poem through the text, but also by structure of his poem. At first glimpse his poem is perceived as unstructured, however, an observant reader will see Ferlinghetti implement structure to draw attention to important words and illuminate the significance of ideas. In the first