Essay About Student Seminar Brief And Seminar Teams

Case Study: Stuck in the Middle
Essay Preview: Case Study: Stuck in the Middle
Report this essay
Student Seminar Brief – Level Six Undergraduate
SM0381 Applied Business Ethics
Seminar Two Student Brief
Seminar Two: Applying the Moral Intensity Descriptive Framework
Seminar Objectives
Students will:
● Form into Seminar Teams for the rest of the module
● Read a brief case study
● Analyse it using the Moral Intensity Framework (Jones, 1991)
Preparation for Seminar
1. Consult the TLP and do the preparatory reading.
2. Please remember to print out this seminar brief and bring it to the seminar.
Seminar Activities: Team Formation
Your tutor will allocate you into four seminar teams. These will remain the same for the rest of the module.
Post Seminar Activities
You tutor will suggest some follow up activities so that you can practise your new ethical analysis skills.
Directed Reading
Crane A and Matten D (2010) Business Ethics OUP Chapter 4 (particularly pages 164-167)
Student Seminar Brief – Level Six Undergraduate
SM0381 Applied Business Ethics
STUDY:
Stuck
middle?
recently
appointed
position
civil
engineer
small
developing
country.
work
Government
Department
that
responsible
maintenance
towns
infrastructure,
such
public
buildings
roads.
You are
youngest
members
senior
management
team
report
directly
Director
Public
Works.
members
management
team
have
been
working
Government
very
long
time,
feel
like
something
outsider.
Director
Public
Works,
Human
Resources
Director,
often
lunch
together,
local
important
organizational
decisions
taken
lunch”.
position
vacant
prior
appointment
Director
Public
Works
assumed
responsibility
number
your
current
responsibilities.
your
appointment,
your
manager
asked
consult
major
decisions
before
implementing
them.
retained
authority
approve
major
works.
After
some
time,
realized
that
despite
having
full
team
permanent
staff,
number
outside
commercial
contractors
still
doing
various
within
organization.
queried
this,
Director
simply
down
team’s
rusty
skills,
significant
backlog,
need
high
quality
work.
Strangely,
impressed
quality
staff
produced
various
small
maintenance
jobs.
Recently,
complimenting
supervisors
handled
emergency,
expressed
frustration
being
given
boring,
jobs
instead
challenging
projects
given
outside
commercial
contractors.
decided
utilize
staff
(rather
contractors)
major
project
because
would
able
supervise
work
better,
ensure
right
quality
save
cost
expensive
outside
contractors.
planned
meticulously
wanted
enlist
support
your
manager
ensure
that
went
well.
prepared
paperwork
took
your
manager
discussion.
looked
disinterested
simply
asked
leave
paperwork
because
preparing
meeting.