Marx Vs. Durkheim
Essay title: Marx Vs. Durkheim
that certain types of suicide occurred among tightly knit groups when they came under severe threat and their members were prepared to die in the groups defense. Because suicide was widely understood as the act of sick or disturbed individuals, Durkheims argument that soldiers who knowingly gave up their lives for their country were committing suicide appeared to diminish the valor of those actions. Durkheim delineated three types of altruistic suicide, based largely on a groups expectations that its members would undertake self-destruction in its defense.
The third type of suicide, anomic, was identified with an abrupt shift in an individuals circumstances, shifts that removed him or her from membership in what had been a well-integrated group. Durkheim showed that nations where divorce was common experienced higher suicide rates than nations where the practice was illegal. Similarly, economic crisis could lead to personal crises for individuals who once thought of themselves as important providers for their families, but when confronted with persisting unemployment found themselves evicted from their homes, their credit rejected, and prospects for improvement dim. If these individuals and their friends were accustomed to thinking of poor people as responsible for their circumstances, then they found themselves condemned by their own categories of thought. Faced with humiliation and a lack of connection with groups who might ease their self-doubts, such individuals might commit anomic suicide.
Durkheims final category of suicide, fatalistic, is relegated to a footnote. This type of suicide occurred within tightly knit groups whose members sought, but could not attain, escape, whose “futures are pitilessly blocked and passions violently choked by oppressive discipline” (Durkheim 1951, p. 276). Prisoners of war or slaves who were bound into distinct groups dominated by other groups might commit suicide in order to escape group membership or to demonstrate control over their lives.
Suicide concludes by moving from what had been a taxonomy of suicide types toward an explanation of how