Comparison of Gaap and Prc GaapEssay title: Comparison of Gaap and Prc GaapIn any financial market, investors and other stakeholders will want to assess the financial position of the company before making decisions concerning that company. In recent years there has been an increased level of convergence in terms of international accounting. Despite this, there are differences in the way accounts prepared dependent upon the country which they take place. For example looking at two companies in the same manufacturing industry; Dell and Hartcourt Companies, Inc. the accounts are prepared under different regimes. Dell is a US computer distributer and hardware manufacturing company and the accounts are prepared according to the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). By comparison, Hartcourt Companies, Inc. is a Chinese distributor of computer hardware based in Shanghai and its accounts are prepared according to the accounting practices of the PRC (People’s Republic of China) GAAP. The International Accounting Standards Committee (IASC) that came into existence in 1973 was the result of accounting bodies from all major companies culminating together with the objective to formulate, publish accounting standards, and procedures relating to the presentation of financial statements. There are a number of differences between these approaches which can result in significant changes in the way accounts presented. It is important that an investor can appreciate these differences and understand how they will impact a company’s performance (Zhang, Lei and Shira, 2007)
China began to liberalize its economy in 1979 and since that time it has experienced remarkable growth. The new accounting system is based upon International Accounting Standards and the accounting system is experiencing changes for the better since it was implemented. The accounting standards of PRC GAAP are rooted in the Chinese Accounting Law (the highest authority in Chinese accounting). The law sets out general principles of accounting for all enterprises and also empowers the Ministry of Finance to administer accounting affairs and to establish uniform accounting regulations and systems. Under the mandate of Accounting Law the Minister of Finance has issued various accounting regulations that apply to different categories of enterprises. China is increasing its transparency in its financial reporting. In addition, it is undergoing a dual transition from a centrally planned economy to a socialist market economy, and from an emerging economy to an industrialized economy in which the business environment is in constant change (Zhang, Lei and Shira, 2007). As an example, local PRC GAAP accounting standards have recently been increasingly adjusted to international IFRS principles and efforts are under way to promote financial know-how.
U.S. GAAP is the body of authoritative literature that comprises accounting and reporting standards in the United States. The GAAP framework of accounting standards has been adopted by nearly all publicly traded U.S. companies and Dell is no exception. There are many differences and similarities between PRC GAAP (account reporting method utilized by Hartcourt Companies Inc) and the GAAP (account reporting method utilized by Dell). However, how that information is presented to the public may be very different simply due to the guidelines they follow in their reporting. In their general approach to accounting reporting the GAAP and the PRC GAAP are similar in that they use principle-based standards accompanied by detailed application guidance. With regards to property,
S.G.,
S.G. is a methodology for reporting to all entities in connection with accounting and reporting related to their business at a level that includes both private and public entities. This reporting framework is a comprehensive and standardized approach to reporting all aspects of our business, such as accounting and reporting related to our corporate operations, as well as all non-corporate entities in connection with our business or assets. As such, the requirements and criteria for reporting any financial or other debt or equity, liability or other obligation to any business or entity may be different because of different accounting/reporting rules and processes applied to the different parts of our business or assets. The scope and impact on our financial system of certain accounting and reporting rules may vary depending on the method used, requirements, and circumstances that we consider to be the most appropriate framework. Our reporting and reporting may also be subject to changes due to the nature or status of changes in the U.S. economic data environment because the reporting and reporting rules of the IRS may, for example, apply differently to certain entities. In the event that any changes in our reporting may impact on or adversely affect our business or assets, our ability to do business as a result of the changes in such reporting rules are subject to any and all audits conducted by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) or our auditors. For more information on our reporting procedures, the procedures set forth in the section titled “Financial Condition and Results of Operations of the Trust Agreement and the GAAP for Fiscal Year 2016” available at $1,093,589.32