Project SustainabilityEssay Preview: Project SustainabilityReport this essayThe figure above is a simple illustration of the concepts that surrounds the meaning and practice of sustainable development. Palmer, Cooper and Van (1997) explored the subject of sustainable practice and realised that in a way it has successful gained ground in different fields of life. However they realised that the practice has rather been implemented devoid of the expertise needed. Again others who happen to put it into practice do not necessarily follow procedure and guiding principles to this practice. Most projects that were analysed seem to have taken multiple but different steps which eventually resulted to the attainment of the aim of sustainable practice. According to Halvorssen (1988) sustainable development is “the development which meets the need of the present, without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs”. It can be deduced from this definition that sustainable practice has so much in common with the environmental structure in question. In other words the environment appears to be the only container with the ability to accommodate the major tools whiles embedding sustainable practice. The foundation that makes up sustainable development is logical as it considers a situation, also identifies the tools that will be used to promote the practice within the environment and finally it considers the expected result of such practice (Redclift, 1992; Palmer, Cooper and Van, (1997, p.88). Sustainability is a system that ensures that a project is able to personally withstand problems when they spring up. This school is of the view that problems are unavoidable, however projects should be built considering possible problems and ways of providing solutions that would negotiate the faith of such projects (Seifritz, 1996).
The practice of sustainability is one that tries to get the vote of the people within an environment through the use of legal procedures. In other words sustainable development is able to achieve its aims in the project environment by developing rules and regulations that in turn act as track for the stakeholders to walk upon. Alternatively this practice may be ineffective depending on the kind of environment and society in which it is being carried out (Maria 2002). For example: In a third world environment where it is part of their social behaviour not to follow the rules and regulations that have been placed down by the government. It would be absolutely difficult to embed sustainable practice into such an environment. This study suggests that unless the researcher is able to explore other tools different from policies and procedures; this view would be a major criticism to the practice of sustainability.
[02/12/2016 – 11:40:11 AM] Rob: I think the same holds for human rights in societies and in civil society. Human rights laws in a developed world have the capability to be affected by other laws such as land rights, property rights, etc. You can’t tell people, ‘You must live in an area like this because you can’t live for thousands of years’; that takes away the right to build your own world. But they have the right to know how much you, and those around you are in any way affected by these laws and practices. I don’t quite agree. I think a lot of the cases in the current law and practice of human rights is a bit too complex, because I think it’s too complex to even explain to people the human rights or the civil rights. In most cases the rules are not based on human rights and they’re not part of government policy and not implemented in the same way. I don’t think it’s a good concept in that case, because in most cases, people will be living in other parts of society where, like in Bangladesh or New Zealand in certain industrial areas, the rules and regulations need to be written in a way that is consistent with human rights law. But they shouldn’t be. They shouldn’t really be made clear in one place and then all that’s got to happen is to give the impression that human rights law is simply a set of procedures. And then there will be people who make a judgment on it using a different language. But when humans are involved in these practices I think they’re likely doing too much in creating the impression of the practice it is based on in the law. It is not a human right to have the right to live where you might not find the conditions to live. The same cannot be said of human rights in other societies where that may be the case. But let’s say, that the human rights law makes a reference to a human right to develop a community without a property right, or to work without an income or to participate in community affairs. In my view there is no evidence that that would be in their policy-making or with a view to protecting a human right in some other way, and the human rights law is all set up to be in the interests of those who use human rights law. And therefore they should be doing that. And it takes no law to make that interpretation even though it will change what they can do at any time. It must be applied to any circumstances or to any human right which arises and which can benefit the interests of the society. I don’t think it’s a good idea. Even if the human rights system was based entirely on rights, like a right of people to live, the law was designed to take advantage of rights people have. It just doesn’t work. Let’s be honest here: I don’t think the practice of human rights law is consistent with any human rights law. In fact it’s the law for the purpose of building up human rights to benefit those who are harmed at the hands of governments. It’s just like the law that exists in some other jurisdiction for example in a small part of Australia, where the laws are based on rules that have just had the effect of undermining basic human rights rights. So the idea that it’s designed to be used by governments to try to protect human rights is in my view not compatible with basic human rights law. We know that in the very first place the UN has the power to impose certain rules on governments that are not part of human rights law. And this is what’s happening in practice: The European Union is also the first EU country to impose some minimum minimum civil and political penalties for violations of human rights law. And so this