Pros And Cons Of Cloning
Essay Preview: Pros And Cons Of Cloning
Report this essay
The Pros and cons of Human Cloning
As humans, we form social perceptions as a result of several factors. According to the social learning theory, people learn through imitation of peers and companions; thus, they form opinions based on the beliefs of those around them. Without a doubt, the social learning theory applies to the discussion of suicide. Current acceptance of suicide in the United States originates from the many different cultures and societies which make up the United States today. The conventional notions relating to suicide do more than just explain the American viewpoint; such information can be extremely revealing about the American social structure. Acceptability of suicide, however, is not fully dependent on those who view it; the suicide victim also forms justifications for his suicide based on that which society presents to him.
To obtain information about former societies and their cultures, historians rely on items such as recovered documents and artifacts; however, the idea of analyzing suicides as means of divulging information about a society is not a new concept. Over one hundred years ago, Emile Durkheim became one of the first men to study suicide. As a result, he developed a theory which links suicides to society. According to Durkheims theory, a suicide victims reasons committing the act reflect that which society considers acceptable or decent. Even today, social perspectives about an issue as controversial as suicide reflect that which is considered “acceptable” behavior. By considering the circumstances under which suicide is considered “acceptable” or “rational”, one can learn about the typical moral structure of the United States.
In the book, Le Suicide, Emile Durkheim discussed four forms of suicide, each involving a different personality type. David Lester relates these types to todays society (“Applying Durkheims Typology” 231). The first of the four is the egoistic suicide. In this case the individual chooses to end his life because of the inability to successfully fit into society. Most frequently, such is the case in suicides committed by young adults. The pressure to be part of a group can sometimes be overwhelming, so much so that the youth feels his only solution is to kill himself. Such a feeling is not only prominent in the United States, but in China as well. The Chinese custom of arranging marriages often causes stress among Chinese youth, so much so that dating and marital stress lead the list of causes for suicide among inhabitants of China (Zhang and Jin 1996). The next form, altruistic suicide, is virtually the opposite of the egoistic personality. In this case, the individual is overly involved with a group and feels that nothing, even his own life, is too much to spare for the benefit of the group. In the United States, the medias coverage of this form of suicide is not very extensive in because suicides of this form have been to known to be committed by cult societies and the such. Next comes the anomic suicide; here, the victim is involved in some sort of crisis situation with which his is incapable of dealing. Say for example, that a man loses his job and becomes unable to pay his bills or support his family. If this man decides to commit suicide, he would partake in an anomic suicide because he has encounter a situation which he believes can only be avoided by death. Victims of anomic suicides rarely take into account that committing suicide will only worsen the situation for those who are dependent upon him. Most frequently, social breakdowns are represented by anomic suicides. Finally, there is the fatalistic suicide, in which the victim feels that he is the object of extreme regulation, and in turn he feels that he lacks freedom and means of escape. This type of suicide attempter may also feel that he has little opportunity to establish himself as an individual. Determining which categories suit recent suicides provides trivial information about the social pressures to which a suicide victim is susceptible to.
Furthermore, Durkheim discussed two critical social elements termed “social integration”, the idea that every individual is in some way integrated into his cultural structure, and “social regulation”, the amount of regulation a culture has over an individual. The extent to which the individual is integrated into that society was the key factor in determining his suicide risk. Individuals were believed to be high risk suicide victims if they were situated at either extreme of Durkheims social integration spectrum. The same true if a society had either too much or not enough control over the individual in question. Researcher Barry Maley further interpreted social integration to have a “connotation of cohesiveness shared sentiments and beliefs”. To be integrated fairly well into a society, means to be content with the social and economic ties one has to the society, yet it also means that one must understand the extent to which the society controls his actions.
Kathy Charmaz, author of The Social Reality of Death, feels that suicide has come to mean only that which people have thought, felt and done about it, as opposed to the act of suicide itself (234). She continues on to say that “what everybody knows about suicide directly reflects the cultural values about it.” (236). In the United States, that which everyone “knows” about suicide can, and does, vary greatly. When discussing suicide, one must distinguish between what one “knows” about the subject and what one “believes”; in doing so, he will discover that he honestly “knows” very little about suicide, and that which he believes about suicide is fairly consistent with the opinions of other Americans. Acceptance of suicide in the United States is a combination of former perceptions of suicide, the perceptions of the various cultures which make up the United States, that which is considered “normal”, and the circumstances under which the suicide is committed. The key to comprehending suicide acceptance as it relates to the United States involves understanding the “stigma” which is strongly associated to the actual act of suicide. As stated by author Kathy Charmaz, “meanings of suicide arise out of what people think, feel, and do about it rather than what is simply given in the act.” (234) As a result, the opinions and ideas toward suicide can vary greatly depending on how the society observes a situation.
Prior societies in which the views of the majority oppose the traditional American perspective of suicide help shape the recent emergence of increased suicide acceptance in the United States.