Essay About Book Politics And Political Association

Aristotle
Essay Preview: Aristotle
Report this essay
Aristotle
Politics
Aristotle in his book politics, argues that the political association is the highest form of
human association , and making all his conclusions based on the assumption that Ðpolis is the
best and only sensible political system. He further adds that political association is the most
sovereign and aims at the highest good
Politics is largely an attempt to determine or rather prove that political association is the best
suited way for securing the happiness of its members or as called in Ðpolitics the citizens .The
interest of the polis and its citizens were seen to be the same since both the city and man aimed
for happiness as the ultimate goal. According to Aristotle, life has no existence outside the
confines of the city and that it is not the city that exists to serve the needs of the individual but is
a mere part and the city is more important than the individual
Aristotles admiration of the social system in a polis shows his support to the slavery.
The polis consisted of citizens which men were born to citizen parents women children and
slaves. Men were considered to be the only rational creation and had to engage and contribute in
the political association of the city, while slaves were used for work. Aristotles above argument
had some major weakness and flaws in it, he address the salves as non-rational, and its in there
best interest to serve there masters, who would give them a rational vision. The main drawback
with this argument is the irrational slave has to have some kind of rationality to judge that his
Arora 2
master is right for him and to follow and obey those orders. If those certain of rationality exist in
these slaves then they are not “natural slaves” and should not be enslaved .
Aristotles belief that a man can become fully human if he engages in the political
association of the city , gives the state full authority over an individuals freedom.
According to his view an individual could not have any true rational needs or interest outside the
confines of the state, as the result it would be absurd to even desire any kind of individual
freedom in opposition to the state. Aristotle does not draw a line, which the state cannot cross
over an individuals privacy or freedom. A central question in modern day philosophy, is the
extent to which a state can impose itself on the freedom of an individual. As a result it would be
absurd to desire any kind of individual freedom in opposition to the state
A little further down in the book Aristotle argues and puts forward his idea that a new
system of government is required as all the proposed theories and existing governments were not
perfect. Before putting his theory on the table, Aristotle reviews and criticizes the existing
theories and government using there flaws and shortcomings as evidence supporting his case. His
second book concentrates on these flaws, discussing them in further details. He attacks all
theorists proposing abolishment of private property for individuals. Aristotle defends private
property by pointing out that greed and selfishness cannot be checked by checking on private
property but these vices result from human wickedness. Abolishing private property does not