The Ideological Function Of CarsEssay Preview: The Ideological Function Of CarsReport this essayThe Ideological Function of CarsA car is a personal tool for transportation that can be used whenever and for whatever reasons. Its role in everyday life varies across public and private spheres of society and carries with it various ideological assumptions. A car is understood to serve the basic universal purpose of travel in the modern world; however, its insertion, absorption, and appropriation into the ideological realm of society transforms cars into extensions of peoples relational identities. The function of a car at its historical conception was a response to peoples need to travel faster and easier. While it may seem neutral and unbiased, a car, as an alternative to other modes of transportation, carries immediate allusions to class in society. Its purpose goes beyond simply transportation. Its ideological function as a mythologized object creates forms of inclusion and exclusion accepted as true and natural to modern society. The details of the type of car or its use are part of the intersectionality of class, race, and gender. Cars can be a form of affiliation or individuation but they ultimately create and reinforce the cycle of society; what Louis Althusser refers as the reproduction of the conditions of production.
In U.S. society a vehicle is practically a standard of everyday life. Its use is accepted almost as necessity for the continuation of normal operations of work and leisure. The reality of cars historical creation has been lost through its subjection to the dialectical social relationships of modern America. At the simplest level a cars function is to move from point A to point B. However the variety of the types of cars and the uses of cars complicate this notion. Once a person gets behind the wheel they automatically transform from passenger to driver. When one purchases a car they become an owner leading to extensive other implications of identity. By mystifying its reality, a cars ideological function serves as symbols of individuals personality, ability, marginality, and so on.
The foremost distinction that a car represents is class. A vehicle is predominantly understood as part of the working middle class necessity in U.S. society. To be able to afford a car is a major exclusionary factor that differentiates between those who have and those who have-not. Cars generally appeal to people part of the work force because they must travel to and from their jobs, making at least moderate income to support the costs of owning or driving a vehicle. Almost adopted as a necessity, having a car is still a luxury for a large portion of American society. It is a large divide between those who drive and reap the benefits of traveling further, making more money, experiencing more than someone limited to walking or public transportation. Having a car is also associated with the concept of freedom and attainment. The capability to travel further both liberates and elevates status. The type of car one drives is also a signifier of ones social status. The road is a public space where peoples class and characteristics are juxtaposed to one another distinguishing their societal roles. A luxury car is an automatic signifier of the drivers status because the subconscious recognition of the price tag associated with vehicles. While someone without a car or a troubled car faces more limitations, thereby maintaining the gap between upper and lower classes.
A less obviously appropriated association with cars is race. As a subjective signifier, race is associated with cars through racist lens of interpretation based on stereotypes and illusions. Certain styles or makes of cars are associated with certain identities of being black, Hispanic, Asian, and white. The ability for cars to be customized and personalized feed the generalizations of certain images of racial groups. These ascribed meanings are accepted as typical and true. Pick-up trucks that are raised with large tires are often associated with white males. “Low-riders” are identified as a largely Hispanic vehicle, “chrome rims” point to the African-American communitys taste in design, while the term “ricer” or “rice burner” refers negatively to a sub-cultural group of predominantly Asian import car enthusiasts. These socially constructed labels carry
n
is a product. It does not represent an identity.
A lighter car
is more visually appealing than a smaller car. A lighter car can be more socially beneficial, less boring than a larger car, and more compact than a smaller car.
.
With these and other examples, the idea of a car may often be a product which looks more appealing. Or, it may be a self-designed ‘product’.
This is no longer a valid idea, as the car itself is not to be made for ‘market’ purposes. We see as ‘product’ of vehicle with other terms/concepts, then and if we take this with any broader or greater degree of certainty, it may be a less socially relevant concept. Our own personal research has also found that ‘car’ can be an identifier for any group, race, gender, and lifestyle. (For more about ‘identifier,’ a type of identifying tag is available). When cars are used to describe an entire ethnic class of people, the car may be associated with these other terms. For example cars, to the extent possible with appropriate reference to vehicles is to mean people with many vehicles. These use cases are not necessarily to imply that cars in general are inherently more useful than automobiles, but rather that cars have been built with a wider range of attributes, from cars to vehicles to automobiles. These use cases do not imply that cars can safely be used as identifiers in terms of all categories of people or vehicles.The fact that our own research has found that ‘car’ is used as an identifier for any racial or ethnic group only makes it more difficult to differentiate an entirely different set of characteristics from the type of car one is associated with. For this reason, we propose in order to limit the use of ‘car’ to those categories. While this has been done in previous cases, we do consider the possibility that it is better to define the term ‘car’ by the exact term as the term we think the car does have, rather than just by the type. In the event car is not used simply to mean a car, then we should allow it as a brand and not classify it as a specific kind of car.
> >