Troops In IraqEssay Preview: Troops In IraqReport this essayI have decided to write my paper on the issue surrounding our troops in Iraq and whether or not they should be removed by all means. I have collected a plethora of information on the subject and have not only found it would be a good idea; however, I have found out that many other countries have removed themselves from the war. Needless to say, it seems to me that our current President George Bush is a war mongrel for failing to do the same.
The size and capabilities of the Coalition forces involved in operations in Iraq has been a subject of much debate, confusion. “As of August 23, 2006, there were 22 non-U.S. military forces contributing armed forces to the Coalition in Iraq. These 22 countries were: Albania, Armenia, Australia, Azerbaijan, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Denmark, El Salvador, Estonia, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Latvia, Lithuania, Macedonia, Moldova, Mongolia, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, South Korea, and the United Kingdom.”
As the United States has increased its stature as a democratic imperialistic super power, so has the threat to its nations security- both its citizens and its military. The events of September 11th changed the way Americans viewed the world. We once thought ourselves as invincible because of our military strength; however, not even our powerful military could stop a surprising attack within our own country. Our attention has now turned to Iraq and their weapons of mass destruction. These weapons pose a severe threat to the citizens and the military personal of the United States. The Bush administration has clearly expressed our need for a regime change In Iraq so our nation and others will be secure. Theyve suggested using force as a last resort; however, before entering into any war we must keep in mind the just wart theory. We must also look at the social, economic,
and public issues facing the United States
and the world. The US state-owned news media were the main tool our adversaries used to threaten us. From the outset, a strong US media was utilized in the Iraq war. As late as 2006, the Washington Post, USA Today, and other USA Today, Fox News included its own article in it that referred to the Iraq War as #1 for Global Warming & the “War on Terror.” The article began the attack on the US military when an “interpol agent” arrived to monitor a series of terrorist attacks by terrorist groups. As soon as the United States and its allies were attacked, the US was “forced” to immediately release a plan on how, where, and how to respond to the threat posed by such groups. This plan, known as the “Project Blue Book,” could be completed within four months. American President Bill Clinton signed the White House Declaration of Independence in August, but the official plan was never made public until 2010. The document that will be the basis for a US “War on Terror”, however, was not originally planned in advance for release until 2010. This was an attempted first release of the “Programming for Civil Society’s “War on Terror,” originally a “strategic strategic initiative”. It called for the United States to use military force against “radical religious/cultural and extremist groups”. This plan never would have even begun. Although it became clear that this plan, however, was merely a plan that was just designed after the beginning of the Iraq War, we cannot deny why it was decided upon. For the first two years of US involvement in “war on terror” in Iraq, the US was in no position to threaten it with war or other measures. In any case, it was prepared to use military force and military intervention to prevent a major international event from occurring. It is not the case here that America and its allies are only using military force to prevent future war or other action. In fact, by the end of 2002, US involvement in the Iraq war led to the collapse of the governments of Iraq and Syria, led in most of the countries where the US has conducted military action. The U.S. has also relied on the “war on terrorism” for its economic gains. In his 2013 autobiography, David Remnick, who has worked extensively for the U.S. intelligence service, calls it “the most successful intelligence operation of the 20th century”. He compares it to the operations of Operation Ajax, which was launched in 1941 and has resulted in the death of over 100,000 men and one hundred children. The “war on terrorism” also has led to a dramatic increase in military and police forces. After the fall of Iraq’s dictator, Baathists and Al-Qaeda commanders used a combination of intelligence, military tools, and covert means to attack America. Even more significant is that the US has spent considerable time in Iraq because of its growing military presence and large number of troops in the Middle East. The United States is also in contact with other countries in which the United States stands at war with, and in violation of, Iraq. America’s relationship with Saudi Arabia is further increased by the relationship between Saudi Arabia and Saudi Arabia’s government in Washington, D.C. According to a recent State Department study, only 3% of their revenues come directly to the United States. This is a much more important number because the U.S. still uses