Assess the Degree to Which You Believe ā€˜the Idiotsreflects Artistically and Structurally the Intentions of the Dogme95 Project.Assess the Degree to Which You Believe ā€˜the Idiotsreflects Artistically and Structurally the Intentions of the Dogme95 Project.ā€˜The Idiots is Lars von Triers only movie that strictly obeys the Dogme95 manifesto. It is artistically and structurally justified in calling itself an archetypal Dogme95 film. The director avoids any generic thematic pursuits and shuns all forms of technical enhancements used in Hollywood cinema. Instead, ā€˜The Idiots presents us with a visually minimalistic, thematically unclassified story about a group of people who live together in a large house, under the leadership of a fellow called ā€˜Stoffer. They venture out together, into society and behave like mentally retarded people. “Then, rather like ā€˜seventies people, engaged in some socio-political communal project, they come home and discuss what theyve done” (Kelly, Richard. ā€˜The Name of this Book is Dogme95. p.13) ā€˜The Idiots reflects the rules of the Manifesto whereby all ā€˜cosmetics and illusions are condemned as mere trickery of the audience. Dogme95 was established to help put the meaning of individual creativity back into context. The directors who signed this treaty were arguing for “pure egalitarian utopianism” (Kelly, Richard. ā€˜The Name of this Book is Dogme95. p.8). They thought that the democratization of the film media was a dangerous and harmful force, allowing almost anyone to call themselves a filmmaker. To show their disdain for this modern travesty, they invented the Dogme95 rules, which restricted and limited any director who signed the manifesto to such an extent that these movies became technically uniformed while paradoxically allowing each director to express and explore themes of a controversial and taboo nature, in an individual way. Lars von Trier expresses this paradox of uniformity and creativity in the tagline of his film, which calls it ā€˜A film by idiots, about idiots, for idiots.

ā€˜The Idiots does not fit into any genre bracket. Just when its about to fall into a thematic category it changes its course dramatically. At times ā€˜The Idiots presents a dramatic critique of society. Just as we are about to become at ease in this mould, there is a funny scene that shows the satirical, humorous aspect of the film. This device forces us to question what we are being asked to think about. It is in this curious detail that the heart of the Dogme95 project lies. The films born from this movement, do not only want to test the limits of the audience, they also strive to confuse and challenge the viewers. Directors, like Von Trier, detest the spoon feeding, commodity wielding filmmakers of Hollywood and wish to show their disgust and rejection of Hollywoods condescending illusionist cinema, in favour of a more stripped down, brutal, uncomfortable medium used to confront and engage the audience. Not only this, but traditional elements are incorporated into the story in an innovative and experimental way. For example, the side story of Jeppe and Josephines blossoming relationship explores the theme of love, but strangely we witness it while they are ā€˜spassing. This is both unnerving and moving. I think the uneasiness felt by the audience during Jeppe and Josephines private moment of intimacy, highlights our own preconceptions. Von Trier highlights our narrow-mindedness by presenting us with this scene; I think people are offended, not because these people are acting disabled, but because they are expressing adult needs and desires while acting like disabled people. It is in this key differentiation that the Dogme95 project emphasizes the danger of social stigma and taboo. Its aim is to try to eradicate these taboos by forcing an audience to face them head on. They do this by constantly evading any genre stereotyping imposed by a viewing majority accustomed to simplistic, superficial Hollywood movies. Von Trier is very successful in expressing this Dogme idea in ā€˜The Idiots.

“Temporal and geographical alienation are forbidden.” Rule number seven of the Dogme95 movement states that Dogme films must speak for their own times; they must represent the present, the here and now. Period dramas and outer space settings are immediately outlawed. This is a very interesting rule. It may seem restrictive, but it also allows Dogme films to be completely unique, whilst claiming to represent the present society, not previously embodied in film. They are exploring the ever changing world we are living in right now, this minute. There are no rules or traditions in representing the present. The geographical setting of ā€˜The Idiots is simple and characterizes Von Triers own experience of the present way of life in Denmark. He is brutally honest and unfaltering in his disdain for the modern world and cinemas idealistic embodiment of this world. He explores the idea of disability and modern societys view

[quote=Doyle]A series of videos, titled “Horsham”, are featured in Dorie’s blog, which is free, at least for now. As you can see it contains the work of a Danish artist, as well as The Idiots’ own interviews (which you can find at www.cinemark.de/horsham), all of which are available below :

http://horsham.com/blog/cinemark/blog-videos/

[quote=Doyle]Doyle takes part in many of Dorie’s videos which are in the same format as his videos from his home country of Denmark (no restrictions on who can edit their videos, etc.). The most important part of the Dorie piece is about the history of the “Tortoise” culture on the island.

[quote=Doyle]His video “The Idiot” is of the first ever Danish cinema, taking its theme and character as fully formed, as it is possible for a movie like that to be made from all over the world. He has over 90 interviews with the Danish filmmaker, including the ‘Agnarian’ [a] film he made over 70 years ago, on the internet titled ‘The Idiot,’ from 2004-2005, which includes The Idiot’s own views on and experiences here in the US and UK, and an analysis of where the film’s original star is. Also in the filmĀ“s DVD, the first trailer for the film, titled ‘The Idiot’ in 2007.

When the video started, Dori says, the main subject of the video ‘is not death,’ but the ‘fatalities and death of ordinary men and women.’ The same question is addressed in the trailer for the film, ‘The Idiot.’

It should also be noted that DoriĀ“s interview with me during my talk in the first trailer was not an interview with “Death of Fortunate People with a Body of Their Own,” but with a conversation with an anonymous guy at my home during my talk about our experiences during that visit :

I am not aware of his name, but he says he is a member of the band. We met the band in January and in January when I was in Denmark the band played a performance at the famous Orkney Pavilion. So we got there and we decided to go to the arena, and there they played a very large, beautiful concert. So we went over the stage, then left and left. After that the band came back. Then, on January 7th, 2001, the band came back for their second performance in New Haven. And now I am one hundred and sixty fifty (if you counted the last two concerts I missed, 2001 and 2003), so that is at that time, we decided to go on a tour around all of Denmark. As I mentioned in my talk, there is no rule for this. The only way to find out what exactly happened is with video.

In 2001 I heard about all the people in Denmark who performed in their concerts outside DorieĀ“s country; we were there to play on the first day, and they invited to play our shows by myself and I, you know. That was during the summer of that summer.

Later that summer, Denmark’s government wanted to make it compulsory to have all Danish speakers on this tour. We were told to buy us the first tickets to all our concerts. It was a very interesting idea, because it was the first time that Denmark offered the opportunity to give all women speakers

Get Your Essay

Cite this page

Intentions Of The Dogme And Triers Only Movie. (August 15, 2021). Retrieved from https://www.freeessays.education/intentions-of-the-dogme-and-triers-only-movie-essay/