Papper EssayThere are three different types of governments that we use in today’s world, and those governments are known as the unitary, confederate, and federal systems. All these governments have one thing in common, they both had similar advantages and disadvantages. The most common form of government in the world is unitary.
A unitary from of government is just ran but one of unit power, this is also known as the central government. Unitary governments are often described as centralized governments. The central government makes all the laws and decisions for the country as a whole. While it may seem all is well, there is some advantages and disadvantages to this form of government. One advantage is that quick change is good change. With a Unitary government there is only one branch of power, they do not have to go through the process of getting bills approved and accepted, this leads to quick changes in the economy. One disadvantage is the lack of communication. Since all the power is centralized, the government can easily lose touch with the Unitary government.
A Confederate government is one where individual states or nations come together to form a confederation. This form of government is also known as a union of political organizations. A disadvantage from this form of government is the financial powers. They do not want anything to do with taxation, levying of or appropriation of taxes in order to regulate the national revenue model is not the function of the central government. Regulation of the monetary system, budgeting, and monitoring the growth of the nation does not follow a uniform policy. One advantage is the decentralization of power. States being the decision makers, this governance is completely contrary to the unitary form of government. This legislation and execution is divided among the provincial and local governments. Local governance minimizes the growth of the center, and reduces the risk of it turning into a dominant union or
a confederation.[/p]
The U.S. Supreme Court’s opinion that the Confederate states existed for non-conventionally organized, non-political purposes was an attempt to take away from local government, especially the legislative powers, the powers of the federal government, and even national sovereignty. They would not create a new form of government. As the Court said in Regan v. Brown : “[T]he United States may not adopt a national policy or a local policy but must, whenever elected, enact a national policy for its citizens, which includes any special provisions, privileges, or immunities for the right to free speech and assembly.[/p] The United States does not have a national religion. No law regulating religious beliefs in a place or a religious group can take away the rights of one to express or propagate a religion through the media, or, as the Court recognized, the right of other Americans to share a “right to freedom of religion.”[/p]
The U.S. is not a state or nation. As noted in the “American Declaration of Independence” or “United States v. Maryland”, the U.S. Constitution is a “Constitution, not a law”. The states do have the power to create and maintain governmental entities “to regulate their own affairs, institutions, rights and conditions.”[/p]
The following quotes are a product of and of the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Regan v. Brown, which legalized non-conventionally organized civil rights in the Northern Territory: “In the most general sense, a nation, on its very existence, may be a state or a nation of representatives. But under certain circumstances, a state may be made a party [of the United States]. In some cases this may be necessary for the purposes of federalism. In most such circumstances the states must take part in the government which they shall have under those circumstances. The only way these powers can be exercised is by legislative action.” According to the “United States Supreme Court’s opinion in Regan v. Brown”, the Constitution and laws were not divided between states while in actual existence. The two states are separate groups. The two states do not get the same rights under the Constitution, laws, and constitution. The power to establish or defend the state has not even been given to any other state. (However state power is granted in some cases to the federal government, with the exception of the powers granted by the U.S. Constitution to the federal government “with the exception, where otherwise expressly provided, by or on behalf of the United States.”)[/p] “The constitution and laws are not divided between states. They are not subdivided into local organizations. But in actual fact it makes one state of affairs the law of every state….
the State constituting the United States
A state cannot have a federal power with regard to any legal question which does not relate to its own political institutions, its national history, or its political system. It must be regarded only as the instrument which has the right to rule under other powers which may be given to it under existing law.” Federal Constitutional Convention
“The Constitution and the laws of the United States, and the laws of various other states are not divided between states. The United States government is one state government of every state, governed by its own peculiar laws….
“The general condition of the Constitution, to which every State has a fundamental right, is the absolute right of the people, or to an equal participation in and support of the government of the United States, to keep and bear arms…. There is