Irony in the Lottery
Irony in the Lottery
The Lottery is among fiction readers favorites. There is no doubt about that. Reading the story arouses bewilderment, curiosity, as well as general interest, which could be accounted for its astonishing ending. However, some of its critics are also quick for checking. They counter that The Lotterys too unexpected finale attest the writers literary inexperience. On the other hand, Shirley Jackson effectively used the aspects of suspense or horror all throughout in order to develop intentionally her seemingly unanticipated ending and generally the obscured meaning her story.
Among the attributes frequently reproached in Jacksons The Lottery are its ambiguous dialogue and characters that are bluntly presented. The Lotterys character development is indeed indistinct whichever direction you look at it. However, Shirley Jackson used them as an advantage to develop her prevailing theme – the horror of mans evil. As part of the development of this centralizing theme, Jackson omitted the exacting characterization of a protagonist and/or antagonists. She does this by displaying everyone in the story as just an average person. The reader would have never determined from the beginning if it were Mr. Joe Summers or Old Man Warner, Mr. and Mrs. Adams or Mrs. Tessie Hutchinson who was the emerging protagonist. Yet this was for the reason that as supporting theme, all characters must be treated equally to prove that the ultimate sacrificial victim (the protagonist) could be anyone; henceforth to emphasize even more the horror of mans evil as central theme.
The next point to consider is Jacksons imprecise style of delivering the short story. Again, this is purely intentional – the dialogue, tone, and the irony which are all but elusive. The dialogue jumps from expected to unexpected remarks, as with Mr. Summers suggestions of replacing the black lottery box and the peoples reaction including Old Man Warners mention that it was “Bad enough to see young Joe Summers up there joking with everybody” as there has always been a lottery. The authors tone remains detached, as with showing no instance that anybody heeded Tessie as she kept on uttering, “It wasnt fair… I think we ought to start over… I tell you it wasnt fair” nor describing any reaction in the people as they were going in upon Tessie. And, irony is prevalent verbally and dramatically – as with the two-sided expression of the black box symbolism and the characters prejudiced and hypocritical behavior – for instance in Mrs. Delacroix, who is supposed to be Tessies good friend, reprimanding her to be a “good sport” saying “All of us took the same chance” and, in the end, selecting a huge stone for throwing at her; A friends loud whisper hoping that its not Nancy; Everyone blandly