Replication of Chava, Kumar, and Warga (2009)
Essay Preview: Replication of Chava, Kumar, and Warga (2009)
Report this essay
Replication of Chava, Kumar, and Warga (2009) Table 2 ReportMingxun “Richard” WangGeorgia Institute of TechnologyMay 31st, 2018(June 9th, 2018 revised)Table of ContentsIntroductionScreening the SampleClassification of CovenantsReplication and ComparisonIssuesIntroductionThis report will illustrate the procedure of data collection and the replication of Table 2 in the Chava, Kumar, and Warga (2009) paper. By carefully following most of the sample screening steps provided in the paper, I was able to establish replications for three different periods. One (1993-2007 replication) had 4188 bonds by 1086 firms (with up-to-today FISD, CRSP, Compustat and ExecComp datasets), which was very close to 4478 bonds by 1064 firms from the Table 2 in the original paper. The other one included bonds from 2008 to 2017. The last one was composed by all the data (1993 to 2017). Then based on these samples, I replicated the Table 2 by categorizing all the covenants into exactly same groups that were described underneath the Table. The 1993-2007 percentage results were mostly like the original results. However, comparing the tables of original 1993-2007 with replication 2008-2017, there were several covenants, such as “Merger restrictions”, and “Stock sale restrictions”, that had obvious declining occurrences in contracts of noninvestment grade high-yield bonds.Screening the SampleGet all the U.S. Domiciled bonds (Firms: 10341)        Dataset “fisd_issuer” → filter the column “country_domicile” to be “USA”.Get all the nonfinancial names (Firms: 7144)        Filtering the dataset “fisd_issuer” → make column “industry_code” exclude all the financial codes (20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26).Filtering by years         Filtering the datasets by three different time periods.1993-2007 (replication to the original period in the paper) (Bonds: 195338; Firms: 9755)2008-2017(Bonds: 193092; Firms: 5380)1993-2017(Bonds: 388430; Firms: 13046)Intersection of Compustat (Bonds: 16976; Firms: 3181)WRDS compustat dataset “funda”, and matched by “cusip” (substring first 6 digits)Intersection of CRSP (Bonds: 12867; Firms: 2600)WRDS CRSP dataset “dsfhdr”, and matched by “cusip” (substring first 6 digits)Intersection of Executive Compustat (Bonds: 9224; Firms: 1436)WRDS ExecComp dataset “execcomp” and matched by “cusip” (substring first 6 digits)Exclude Yankee, Canadian, and Foreign Currencies (Bonds: 9060; Firms: 1422)Corporate Debentures (Bonds: 6289; Firms: 1127)Let the column “asset_backed” to be “N”Get all the ratings at the time of initial issuance (Bonds: 4183; Firms: 1085)Combine datasets “fisd_rating”, “fisd_ratings”, and “fisd_rating_hist”, and keep only the very beginning ratings for each bond. Convert all the ratings from Moody’s, Fitch, and S&P into categories of AAA, AA, A, BBB, BB, B, CCC and below groups.Key Numbers by steps (Updated on June 9th, 2018)Filter Applied by StepNumber of BondsNumber of firmsPeriod: 1993-20071953389755Intersection of Compustat169763181Intersection of CRSP128672600Intersection of ExecComp92241436Exclude Yankee, Canadian, and other foreign currencies90601422US Domicile and nonfinancial62891127With Covenants record and Corporate Debentures 41831085Classification of CovenantsAll the covenants were from three FISD tables, “fisd_bondholder_protective” (18), “fisd_issuer_restrictive” (18), and “fisd_subs_restrictive” (14). In total of 50 covenants, along with “secured or not” covenant information from the table “fisd_issue”. Table of Classification of Covenants        ##: means having possibility that the covenant belongs to the category, however could not be determined to be included into the replication        **: means highly possibility that the covenant belongs to the category, and had been considered and calculated into the replication Class of CovenantElement CovenantPanel A: Investment restrictionsIndirect investment restrictionstransaction_affiliatesfixed_charge_coveragemaintenance_net_worthsubsidiary_redesignationfixed_charge_coverage (sub)Merger restrictionsconsolidation_mergerSecuredsecurity_levelStock sale restrictions** stock_transfer_sale_dispDirect investment restrictions** Investments** investments_unrestricted_subsInvestment restrictionAll covenants of Panel APanel B: Dividend restrictionsDividend payment restrictions** dividends_related_payments** dividends_related_payments(sub)Restrictions on other payments** restricted_paymentsDividend or other payment restrictionAll covenants of Panel BPanel C: Subsequent financing restrictionsRestrictions on subordinate debt issuancesubordinated_debt_issuancenet_earnings_test_issuanceleverage_testborrowing_restrictedsubsidiary_guaranteeleverage_test (sub)negative_pledge_covenantRestrictions on sale and lease obligations** sales_leaseback** sales_leaseback (sub)** asset_sale_clause## sale_assets## sale_xfer_assets_unrestrictedRestrictions on debt priorityfunded_debtindebtednesslienssenior_debt_issuancefunded_debt (sub)indebtedness (sub)liens (sub)Stock issuance restriction** stock_issuance_issuerstock_issuancepreferred_stock_issuanceSubsequent financing restrictionsAll covenants of Panel CPanel D: Event-related restrictionsDefault-related event covenantscross_defaultcross_accelerationrating_decline_trigger_putdeclining_net_worthChange in control poison putchange_control_put_provisionsEvent restrictionsAll covenants of Panel D
Essay About Stock Sale Restrictions And Merger Restrictions
Essay, Pages 1 (675 words)
Latest Update: July 8, 2021
//= get_the_date(); ?>
Views: 32
//= gt_get_post_view(); ?>
Related Topics:
Stock Sale Restrictions And Merger Restrictions. (July 8, 2021). Retrieved from https://www.freeessays.education/stock-sale-restrictions-and-merger-restrictions-essay/