Bodyguards and AssassinsEssay Preview: Bodyguards and AssassinsReport this essayName: Qing Wen Room: #612Program title: Movie, Bodyguards and Assassins Date of Program:10/7//2017Presenter: Chinese Student Association The movie “Bodyguards and Assassins” showed all sides of Chinese revolutionaries, businessmen, beggars, coachman, students and gamblers. It also portrayed troupes in Hong Kong Central Bathing blood struggle, who prevented an assassination and protected Sun Yat-sen. Dr. Sun Yat –sen led the 1911 revolution and overthrew the last feudal dynasty in China’s history. The imperial system collapsed in the Revolution of 1911, and a new republic was established. Sun Yat-sen is the first president and founding father of the People’s Republic of China. First of all, from this movie, I learned about the importance of independence and democracy. Quoting a lines from this film, I would say “Revolution is the tide of history.” The feudal system of China had been existence for a long and tortuous amount of time, lasting for two thousand years in China. In the ancient period, China has a very serious hierarchy in the ancient period. For example, the status of women very low—they were regarded as the property of their fathers or husbands and could do nothing without their consent. This produced inequality in power. In order to change this federal ideology and overthrow the federal government, it was necessary to incite a revolution to build a new democratic country. Personally, I strongly believe that only if a country becomes independent and democratic, can the society prosper and people have a happy and leisure-filed life.
In addition, what struck me the most was the importance of national peace. Peace and development are the major themes of the present era. In this new century, we have to start from the understanding that peace belongs not only to the State or individuals, but to the people of a nation. Peace is especially important in todays society, because it helps to build a better environment for the coming generation. Recently, there was a shooting event in Las Vegas. There were more than 50 people killed and more than 500 people were hurt in this shooting. This event demonstrates the priority of maintaining a peaceful and healthy society where people live in harmony. Maintaining world peace is our responsibility. There would be much less murder and robberies, and more durable development and prosperity in this world, if peace was taken care of. Let us wake in peace because peace can make the nation stronger and bring stability.
#6 How to deal with violence on the border
#7 The way to deal with violence and violence can be described as one continuous process. There are various ways which the U.S. can cooperate with the Islamic State. According to an article we wrote in the beginning of 2014, on July 24, ISIS claimed responsibility for a suicide attack on the American Embassy in Baghdad that killed Ambassador William Foley near the embassy building.
But it went too far. US forces are no longer going to cross into Iraq, and US troops are currently in Syria, just as they were two months ago, in order to conduct a large-scale operation on the Syrian side. In the last days, there has been a mass casualty attack, most likely at the US Embassy in Baghdad, along with an attack on all U.S. military posts and buildings. So, when they attack the US on their own, with US forces now in Syria, will they have a much better chance of winning the war? According to the United States military, they will, just like the Iraqi government, win, despite having a large number of civilian casualties. No doubt the US is doing this in large part because of the U.S. commitment of many of its military personnel in Baghdad, to the fighting against terrorism like that in Fallujah. But who will keep American forces there? Who will have more U.S. support for them when the war starts here? No doubt they will need U.S. armed forces to combat the Islamic State. If their commander is given the choice of keeping American troops there or risking another US military engagement, there is a huge choice. Will they fight the Islamic State and the rest of the international community, or will they simply wait for it to die a violent death and use the same strategies and tactics to prevent it from coming back as a threat? This is a problem because it would be in the national interests of America, not the other way around. If the United States is concerned about the situation in Iraq and Syria, they will immediately use force against the Islamic State. Will this lead to more mass casualties, more civilian casualties, more deaths of the people who live in them? Will they have to do it? What advice would you give someone who is a US citizen living in Iraq and Syria because of this?
#8 Which means that American policy and government has been completely turned against the Islamic State not only in Iraq and Syria, but everywhere in the world.
#9 The question that the U.S. is asking ourselves is whether our own government is taking up the fight from ISIS?
One answer is to think like the U.S. is taking up this fight with other nations. We have already committed to the fight against the Islamic State. We will fight for peace for our people here in the United States on the ground. How much will it cost us to give this effort on to other people? I hope we are seeing a positive change in how foreign policies are viewed. In our recent conversations about the United States and Iraq, some have called for military action. This could allow the US to build more modern forces. This could even save American taxpayers. We could even allow the United States to have a much more sustainable business. But what if we go back on our American policy? If not, what will we do with them? What will they do to us? In the end, what will we give them when they