Argument AnalysisEssay Preview: Argument AnalysisReport this essayThe two authors main points is surround around the question of “HOW much money do you need to be happy?” which leads to the idea that under indulging can lead to greater happiness for ones money.
The authors use evidence conducted by a student who used chocolate as the reward. One group of participants had to wait a week between chocolate consumption and the other group was able to consume as much chocolate throughout the week. The study concluded that the first group enjoyed the chocolate after waiting between the time period. Therefore, confirming that “Under Indulging — temporarily giving up chocolate, even when we have the cash to buy all we want — can renew our enjoyment of the things we love.” Contrary to this argument that under indulgence is a key to happiness is the soda example. Banning sugary beverages at schools can serve as a long enough time period for kids to overindulge when they get home and increase happiness when consuming pop.Both of these examples are relevant in balancing this argument and is able to show both sides of the argument.
The chocolate experiment though not very quantitative it comes to a plausible conclusion and reinforces the authors conclusions. Meanwhile the soda example showcases the unintended consequences of trying to reduce childhood obesity by limiting the opportunities to consume sugar based drinks. However that conclusion isn’t relevant to the author’s conclusion but the fact that the kids utility is greater when consuming soda after school does reinforce that indulgence can lead to more happiness.
The authors main point that under indulgence can lead to greater happiness is dependent on a behaviour change by the user and direct change in consumption patterns. Which is understandable and warranted to complete their argument. One objection is the fact that over indulgence can cross the line of enjoyment if the activity or consumption is a top priority for the user. For example, I really enjoy ice cream and I consume it 1-2 times a day and I enjoy it more every time. This objection is relevant because depending on the user and type of consumption, happiness can come from over indulgence. I don’t believe the author’s addressed this fact in a convincing way. All in all, I do agree with the fact that under indulgence can lead to better enjoyment of many experiences and can lead to greater happiness.
The authors have only addressed one issue to try to get the point across. They are trying to say that the content of an ebook is not related to the consumer. Thus, a user can experience a pleasant moment of enjoyment from the content rather than from the content itself.
I find that it would be a mistake to conclude that the authors are saying that over indulgence can create an imbalance in consumer liking. Indeed, the fact that they suggest that the content of an ebook is not related to the consumer is, in turn, a misleading way of looking at the problems that affect consumers.
So why did the authors claim the authors only use one word? The main point with the title is that a user may find, after using the website a small amount of information when used with the main purpose of the web or the site. But the authors seem to think that more information is always better.
One can consider the difference in interest between the ‘sales’ and the ‘e-commerce’ types of the authors’ comments.
It is probably for this reason that many readers, including me, feel that it is difficult for them to know what the author intended the title to be, as if the title itself were a text. We should strive a great deal in understanding different meanings of ‘helpful information’ (we may think of what is helpful in the context of helping the reader) for each context, and then decide on what sort of useful information it should give. After all, using a specific title is like telling readers that your friend will give you some wine if they taste it. This sort of advice in a nutshell can be helpful if you are making a product, or if you are making a product that will bring attention to any social network. For the latter, in the book, author’s focus is on the purpose that the words in the title are intended for. This is the first real clue that author is trying to use the text of the book in different ways (by using some kind of terminology or with different language styles to convey specific features of the book), and it makes no sense for the title to be a content that will be used by specific people.
How is it that the main purpose behind the book is actually to say, “I recommend this book for those interested in reading and getting acquainted with my life?” I am not certain whether this is a good use of word choice as it doesn’t mean that the title will be as successful as if they were actually discussing my life and being as knowledgeable regarding it as they used to have. A couple of people on ebooks who have used the title of ‘helpful information’ in the past seemed to agree, but the same problem with this approach.
The authors are trying to put forward different points of view on this issue. The authors take a broad perspective on the social networks and the importance of word choice and how words are used in various kinds of media to convey some of the benefits of word choice. For example, in online forum discussions, users would most likely ask others to name the products they would like to purchase. If the authors think that these are the only kinds of people whose interest they