The Value of Work
Essay Preview: The Value of Work
Report this essay
The Value of Work
Someone wrote in DEOS just the other day, “Is a terrible, boring, mind-numbing job better than unemployment, or not? Will the society/economy accommodate
the thing called “intelligence” or will it only accommodate
some peoples intelligence?”
We have all, of course, heard the official answer to this sort of question. It is always better to work. Work gives you dignity. Work helps the economy. Work means that you are not merely a parasite living off the work that others do. If you think certain jobs are “beneath” you, then you not only display your own ignorance, you also demean the people already working in those jobs.
And lets face it. If you dont work, then your quality of life will be even worse than when working at one of those jobs. I have spent time on unemployment, and even a summer on welfare, when I broke my wrist. Trust me, living on $400 a month – which is about what I got when I worked at 7-Eleven – is infinitely better than living on the $86 a month I got from welfare. Our institutions are set up to discourage people from living on welfare, and they do a very good job – only the desperately needy or the doggedly unemployed are on welfare.
Goodness knows, I was happy enough to get the 7-Eleven job in the summer of 1982. The oil boom in Alberta had just collapsed, I had taken one year of university classes, I had no money and no prospects of getting money, and something, anything, was better than nothing. And I stuck with 7-Eleven through to the end of the summer of 1984, working full time in the summer and on vacations, pulling the night shift weekends during the school year. After all, 7-Eleven was just the latest in a series of such jobs I had held (leading to an employment history sufficiently varied to warrant a timeline just to keep track).
Working at the store was sometimes pretty busy, but at three oclock Sunday morning there is plenty of time while stocking shelves to ponder ones role in the larger economy. One thing I knew for sure: I wouldnt be working there if I didnt have to. I had much better things to do at that time of the day, not the least of which was to sleep. Its hard to say that working at the 7-Eleven hurt my GPA (spending 20 hours a week in the student newspaper office probably played a role). But it didnt help.
And I have wondered ever since those days why it is that we have structured society in such a way as to ensure that many people suffer considerable hardship if they dont work in such positions, and that many more suffer considerably more hardship because they cannot work.
For after all, lets think for a moment about just what it is that companies like 7-Eleven, McDonalds, and their ilk, contribute to the economy. Oh, no doubt, we could point to them and say they employ x number of people, that they have corporate earnings of such-and-such, that they contribute so many millions of dollars to the gross domestic product. But these indicators show us nothing other than the fact that they are money mills: money goes in, money goes out. But what do they produce?
Because, after all, the strength of an economy is not in how much money flows through it. Measures of the flow of money are meaningless when it comes to determining whether or not a society is actually wealthy. The strength of an economy is measured, minimally, by what it produces – that is, what food it raises from the ground, what minerals it mines, what wood it hews from the forests, what power is produced in its plants, what amount of finished products is produced in its factories, what innovation is produced by its researchers, what cultural and other artifacts are produced by its artists.
And, indeed, even the measure of production is a misleading indicator, because there is a great deal of production that produces no wealth whatsoever. My favorite example is, of course, the pet rock, which would no doubt have been included in the manufacturing statistics, not to mention the GDP, but which consisted entirely of empty production. And it is not hard to look around and find numerous other products of dubious or negligible utility. The wonder of it is that they gain any market at all, and of course they would not, were it not for that other engine of empty production, the marketing and advertising industry.
The fact is, we produce much more than we need, and once the market for things that we need has become saturated, we produce things we dont need. The production of things we dont need generates jobs – and we need jobs, remember, because otherwise people would starve – and in order to ensure the constant purchase of things we dont need we also produce the means, through marketing and advertisement, of persuading people that they do need these things. And we count this ever-mounting spiral as something called progress, and as the GDP numbers march steadily higher, we say the economy is getting better.
Adbusters, of course, has been running with a campaign over the course of the last few years centered around the theme, Is economic progress killing the planet? because, after all, when you use more and more resources to produce things you dont need, you place an increasing strain on the carrying capacity of the environment, and if economic progress is not measured in relation to this carrying capacity (and, arguably, its not), then the more you progress, the poorer you become.
And I think thats a good point, and if Adbusters can ever get its commercials on the air (they have, of course, been blocked in their efforts to advertise things like Buy Nothing Day, it being bad for the economy and all), Ill support them. But I think theres a deeper point here, one we dont often consider, and thats the enormous waste of what might be (wrongly) called human resources as well. Because the main thing that occurred to me as I stocked shelves at a 7-Eleven is that I was not feeding the hungrey, I was not educating the illiterate, I was not housing the homeless – I was not, in other words, producing anything of value to our society whatsoever.
And if you accept this, I realized, then it follows that I was as much of a drain on society as I would be were I unemployed. And if I am a drain on society, I asked myself, then why am I spending my nights at 7-Eleven? One way or another, my useless non-production had to be supported, which meant taking some amount of money (a pittance) out of the national wealth, and giving it to me. And it seemed to me that, for the same