Proletariat Despair In Uncle VanyaEssay Preview: Proletariat Despair In Uncle VanyaReport this essayAnton Chekhov’s play “Uncle Vanya” tells the story of a late 1800’s Russian estate tossed into turmoil by the arrival of a professor Serebryakov, a man that has retired from academia to live on his dead wife’s land. The tiresome Serebryakov, displays arrogance and tyranny to everyone around him, and only stays on the estate due to the blind admiration of his former mother-in law. His beautiful young wife, Elena, is lusted after by the other men on the estate, including the doctor Mikhail Lvovich Astrov and the manager of the estate, Ivan Petrovich Voynitzky, Uncle Vanya. Indeed, the primary conflict in the novel is between Vanya and the professor, for upon meeting the figure for which he has toiled for years, Vanya realizes that he has wasted his life laboring for a useless man. It is possible; however, to extend this conflict to a broader matter, what Karl Marx would describe as a larger class struggle between the proletariat, the class that forever labors to support the bourgeoisie, which controls the means of productions and shamelessly exploits the work of the proletariat for their own benefit. The play “Uncle Vanya” exemplifies the type of world the Marx described facing “the specter of Communism”; one where the proletariat and the bourgeoisie are on the verge of revolution.
As previously stated, the primary conflict in the book is between Professor Serebryakov, and his estate manager, Vanya. Vanya feels as though his “life is a waste”, because instead of working for his own gain and notoriety, he has spent most of his life working for the benefit of Serebryakov. In the play, Serebryakov represents the bourgeoisie, the group that owns the means of production; that oppresses the destitute working class, abuses and exploits them. Serebryakov is the wealthy, educated person for whom the estate is run; he makes himself a great burden to the workers of the estate and demands that the peasants send him the fruits of their labor. Serebryakov has absolutely no concern for the comfort or happiness of his workers. He happily deprives his own daughter, forcing her to live in near poverty so that he can live leisurely. In this way, the professor shows that he is not concerned with any sort of familial relationships; it is all about money. In the play, the professor is not supported by the sweat of his own brow or the work of his own hands; but has achieved his position by riding on the backs of his workers.
Uncle Vanya, and, to a lesser extent, Sonya, daughter of Serebryakov and his dead wife, represent the proletariat. Marx defined the proletariat as the poor, anonymous working class, the joyless workers that endlessly toil not so that they can enjoy the products of their efforts but so that they receive a miniscule wage. These people exist solely so that the bourgeoisie can enjoy their profits. Sonya describes how she and Vanya “constantly toil for others’, how they “spent their nights translating
Although this obviously one-sided relationship had existed for years, open conflict does not arise until Serebryakov discloses his plan to sell the estate. When he hears this proposal, Vanya realizes that the bourgeoisie will unashamedly discard him, and “toss
hag and kills the other вЂ‚Ñœ, leaving Vanya on his own, but is injured, and not seen again by the authorities for a few months later.
I am unable to understand how you, the Šarasov of the ŠiГa, do not think of
Please do, but don’t. I will fight on
I can’t wait for you to go away.
I was waiting. I saw you there. You are the only one who could make sense of my intentions – when I can not tell you where to go away – you are my friend, but I cannot let you remain… I know I need to end this… and
I always felt that you were not real – you are a kind hero, but in truth you are
After our talks, the rest of your friends are out at the village’s main gate, trying to escape the
There’s nothing
Please don’t try to change the way we live.