Third World CountriesEssay Preview: Third World CountriesReport this essayCurrently the background of developing, third world countries are products made by child labor. So if we would ban those companies who are producing goods made by child labor many children would loose their job they will be left homeless because many of those children are orphans, dont have home or dont want to go back there, so there will be much more poverty. Preposition plan is making the problem bigger and this plan is not effective. As in example in Asia 22 percent of work force are children and 47 percent of them are only sources of family income. At same level child labor is very important for developing countries and companies are not able to employ other people who are in legal age because they would have to pay bigger pays, and they are not able to do that. In developing, third world countries, there are no social guarantees therefore we would release those children into poor, full of starvation life. So we have to strengthen economy and make a better social situation and only then we could try to make more drastic measures. But now we would do more harms and benefits.
One of child labor reasons is culture. This problem about child labor there is rooted. In those developing countries not many people know about human rights. And people who are living in those countries care about surviving because their living conditions are really bad and not about someones rights. So if we take away their source of income and try to change their beliefs that they had for hundreds of years they would resist it. And this is one of the harms that come if we ban the import right now. We should wait for better social guarantees in that countries for people to understand the importance of human rights. Sometimes ban leads to great conflicts: Arab league and Israel conflict after boycott and one of the Americas revolution war reasons was boycott.
The UN and the UN Council of Europe
“Well, that’s just how it goes. Everyone who gets killed in any way by a government is really dead. And if you can get away with it, well, why did the United Nations put you out of a job?” ― UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon, September 23, 2008
The US State Department’s response to the passage of the Children’s Rights in China Act (CPRC)
In 2008 the U.S. sent a letter to China stating that the Chinese Government should take responsibility and promote the rights of Chinese parents, and to take action and encourage greater awareness of these rights. These laws did not pass in 2008. There was simply no discussion of the issue in the Chinese government. In addition, this was the year that the Children’s Rights Act was signed in China, and in 2010 China passed a law prohibiting all private organizations that are a part of that law from soliciting, recruiting, teaching, or providing educational materials, or even working with individuals in China at the time, and those companies were later banned from participating in the program of providing such resources
U.S. government policy in the 1990s
During the 1990s, the first comprehensive immigration reform law passed in the United States came in 1995 with the enactment of the Child Labor Act of 1996 which made a number of changes. The first step is for the government to allow young workers to join employers that are willing enough to hire and have a decent income. The law sets forth what kinds of work-related skills the new employers are looking for, what training their new workers will need, and what responsibilities they will provide them on the job. One of the most common employers we found in our sample was the small electronics store in Manhattan that was doing a lot of building and marketing. Some of them wanted to become salespeople, others were building their own factories and were just being a hobbyist. In fact, we couldn’t find anyone in the U.S. directly who did any of these areas of production and sales work-related skills. Most of these folks were highly compensated. But in my experience they did not have the experience and skills that the U.S. government is seeking in a position to employ them, so they were just there for the profit or the profit opportunity. They had to make sacrifices. We went back and looked at the jobs we were looking for and that’s where this started.
“One thing that is absolutely unique about these new policies, when they came out, one of the main things they were trying to do was provide a framework to define what is considered an occupation that they had to look at carefully in order to determine if they were permitted to employ young people: how often do you have workers who work in occupations with more exposure to people that are not as well known?” ― U.S. Ambassador to China Christopher J. Campbell, February 10, 2010
A similar approach was taken for many of the other legal positions of foreign diplomats who were elected after the 2010 U