Rise Of Neo Realist Film In Italy
Essay Preview: Rise Of Neo Realist Film In Italy
Report this essay
Account for the rise of neo-realism and consider de Sicas Bicycle Thieves in relation to this cycle of films.
The rise of neo-realism in Italy can be accredited, in large part, to the incredibly chaotic society that inspired its conception. Italy of the 1940s was a country in turmoil, and directors committed to the neo-realist genre of filmmaking were determined to portray the country as such. The vacuum left after the collapse of the fascist film industry allowed directors such as de Sica to champion a new style of film.
The years 1945 and 1946 saw the gradual reestablishment of normalcy in Italy after the end of World War II and the civil war against the Nazis and Mussolinis puppet northern republic (Repubblica di SalДІ) had ceased.
For occupied Italy however, there were many battles still to be fought. A host of crises emerged in the immediate post-war period. The vital issues to be tackled included: the purge and replacement of Fascist civil servants; Sicilian separatism; and massive pressure by landless peasants for agrarian reform in the countryside; inflation; the black market and currency devaluation. Great social upheaval proved to be an impetus for innovation and ultimately contributed led to the creation of a mode of expression which could peel away the glossy layer of society, and show life for what it was. This mode of expression would come to be known as neo-realism. (Houston 1968)
Today we have a cinema of personal relationships, of private worlds with anti-heroes engaged in splicing together the broken and rough ends of personality, or in pursuing illusions half-recognized as such; an amoral cinema, or one endeavouring to construct its morality. In times when there is great social unrest however there is a far more acute awareness of political and social issues. Such was the case in post-war Italy. Neo-realism, as the artistic expression of a historical period represented an important revolutionary moment of Italian thought:
” Neo-realism is the privileged medium for the conveyance of that new way of thinking and seeing realitythat need to analyse ourselves, that necessity to follow man and his vital problems”. (“In Defence of Italian Cinema” Springtime, edited by Overby, pp.215-218.cited in Houston)
World War II physically and economically devastated the film industries of the Soviet Union, Japan, and most of the European nations. Italys early surrender, however, left its facilities relatively intact, enabling the Italian cinema to lead the post-World War II film renaissance with its development of the Neorealist movement.
Taking advantage, during the interregnum, of the disarray of the previously Fascist-run film industry, Rossellini brought out two cinematic products of a novel and as yet indefinable theoretical status: Rome, Open City and Paisan. The Italian public was at first under whelmed by their artistic merits: they presented reality, not art. Fortunately, other audiences around the world opined differently, and eventually persuaded Italians that art and realism were far from being mutually exclusive concept. (Houston 1963)
Most directors of the immediate post-war period belonged to a generation brought up under the “calligraphic” mandates of the Fascist era: no politics, no violence, no real-life ugliness. They aimed at reaching large masses of people and generally cared little for the exploration of new paths in cinematographic expression or techniques. And they often drew upon pre-existing literary texts whose plots they re-created for the screen with hardly any ambition beyond an illustrative one. By contrast, neo-realism concerned itself with fascism and wars, it refused to sugar coat the devastation and disarray caused by the Second World War: (Houston 1963)
Neo-realism was first and foremost a moral statement, whose purpose was to promote a true objectivity, one that would force viewers to abandon the limitations of a strictly personal perspective and to embrace the reality of “others . . . with all the ethical responsibility that such a vision entails” (Quoted in “A Discourse on Neo-Realism, ” Springtime, ed. Overby, 1987:159 cited in Houston 1963:19).
The heyday of the Italian film was in the 1950s. Neo-Realism, best represented in the work of Roberto Rossellini and Vittorio De Sica, diverged from the escapism favoured during the interwar years to realism which represented those men, women women and children at the coal face of society.
In the immediate post-war period, Italy and its people were devastated economically and spiritually. Jobs were agonizingly scarce, so when Antonio Ricci is offered a job putting up large movie posters, he jumps at the chance, but he needs a bicycle for the job. To secure one, his wife takes their precious matrimonial bedding -the last thing of value they own – to the huge national pawnshop.
During the first hour of his first day of work, Antonios bicycle is brazenly stolen. From that point on, Antonio and his small but forceful son Bruno search desperately for the priceless bicycle. Through their ordeal, father and son forge heart-breaking bonds. This film defined the artistic heights reachable by the neo-realist aesthetic with location shooting and non-professional actors. The film received many accolades: Winner of Special Academy Award, New York Film Critics Circle, and Golden Globes. (Houston 1963)
“The reality buried under the myths slowly reflowered. The cinema began its creation of the world. Here was a tree; here an old man; here a house; here a man eating, a man sleeping, a man crying. . . “.
The quotation is from Cesare Zavattini, scriptwriter of most of de Sicas films, one of the most fertile creative minds in the post-war Italian cinema. Zavattini was a man whose ideas about the cinema and society were bold, and undeniably brilliant.
Do away with the story, urged Zavattini, hunt down your material in the streets around you, take the simplest of human situations and uncover the elements contained within it; do away with the professional actor, since to want one person to play another implies the calculated plot; and do away with the kind of technical paraphernalia that gets in the way of this immediate contact with reality. (Houston 1963)
Everyday living, in its most familiar, unadventurous guises, can never be boring; this was the mantra of neo-realists founders. Drama that tries to