Could the Spanish Armada Have Succeeded?Essay Preview: Could the Spanish Armada Have Succeeded?Report this essayCould the Spanish Armada have succeeded?The relentless decline in relations between Spain and England post 1558 engender a feeling of certain inevitability within the hostilities that broke out in 1585. Although tension between the two countries was extremely high it took years of preparations to actually instigate war.
When Mary Queen of England died Philip lost all attachments with England and when Elizabeth came to power England no longer remained Catholic, Philip felt that England had now become an enemy rather than an ally. Prior to the Armada Elizabeth kept communication open with Philip and affirmed that they were both clear-cut associates, this was entirely fallacious as Elizabeth; a master at procrastination simultaneously was directing English Pirates to seize Spanish ships and goods in the West Indies. This was a continual irritation for Philip and generated hostility between the two sides but Elizabeths obvious support for Protestants in the Netherlands in their revolt against Spanish occupation caused massive aggravation for Philip and was the final push into war for Spain. Philip believed that it was his duty to lead Protestant England back to the true Church; he considered the Armada as a ÐHoly Crusade and believed that, ÐGods service “required” him to intervene in order to liberate the Catholic Queen of Scotts and restore Catholicism in England. 1.
Work commenced on the Armada as early as 1584 although it would take years before it would be ready for battle due to the shear size of the fleet. The plans of attack were drawn up years before completion of the Armada and thought by Phillip to be the finest plan of attack. In fact when put into motion they were of such immense complexity that to achieve them was virtually unfeasible, the lack of technological advances along with almost non-existent communications made it theoretically unattainable. Ultimately contained in the initial plans of Attack were directions that unknowingly would result in failure for the Armada. The Armada consisted probably between Ð130 Ð- 40, carrying perhaps 7,000 sailors and some 19,000 soldiers 2. , while in contrast the English fleet contained some where in the region of Ð197 ships and possibly 15,925 men, 3. This shows that the Spanish had more men per ship, solely due to the additional soldiers on board that would ultimately be required for the invasion of England. This would have made the Spanish fleet heavier and slower than the English side due to the weight difference. Also contributing to the weight of the Armada was the further supplies it had to carry that included food, water and weapons for these extra soldiers. The Spanish ships where mainly constructed in Cantabria and the Netherlands but some ships were built as far out as Danzig. The main difference between the Spanish and English fleets was that the English ships were of a more modern design, the English ÐRoyal Galleons were revolutionary compared to the Spanish ÐGalleasses which still used oars. Although these Spanish ships had previous experience in sea battles, they were not prepared to take on the rough, treacherous waters of Atlantic. The actual ships themselves had major faults and these minute details in the ships construction would cause colossal dilemma onboard. The wood used in hull and decking in some of the later ships was still damp and some even rotten. This not only give the ship a weak and unstable structure but the damp and decayed wood contaminated the ships food and water giving way to illness and infection.
Even before the Armada set sail it was surrounded by potential problems that would result in its crippling defeat. The actual plan of the invasion was seriously defective and opaque as a plan of such a massive scale would need precise coordination and communication, this scale of accuracy was just not possible at that time. The first objective of the Armada was basically to sail through the English Channel, hold the narrow waters between Flanders and England so Dutch supplies could arrive safe from attack and then unite with Parmas invasion fleet and additional soldiers as to commence the vital invasion of England. Unfortunately, ÐPhilips instructions contained two glaring omissions: the continuing absence of any detailed explanation as how to rendezvous should be effected, and how the Armada could secure local command of the sea to cover Parmas crossing. 4. Spains Lord High Admiral Santa Cruz originally designed the plan of the Armada and was chosen to be admiral but regrettably died in 1586. Philip called the Duke of Medina Sidonia to be new admiral of the Armada but although a good general, Medina Sidonia had no naval experience and lacked the knowledge of amphibious battles. Furthermore Armada also consisted of a high number of soldiers with little nautical experience, in many cases they refused orders from sailors which lead to splits among the sides onboard. As the chain of command was corrupt there was no structure onboard when battle broke out causing panic among the crew resulting awkward attempts to coordinate themselves against the superior commanded English ships. It wasnt just the crew onboard that had trouble working together; the actual cannons and shots were extremely unreliable, occasionally they would not fit or not work at all, ÐShip-mounted Spanish guns mounted on land field carriages were cumbersome, dangerous, and difficult to repair and reloadÐeventually, the English discovered the near uselessness of Spanish guns, and moved in closer using heavier more effective guns. 5. Had Philip paid more attention to the artillery used and structured the chain off command on board more specifically then there would have been less errors when in battle, giving the Spanish a better chance of success.
Another factor that contributed to complications surrounding the Armada was when Drake attacked Cadiz harbor in 1587; the attack damaged a number of ships that were in construction for the Armada. This was another major setback for the Armada and cost Philip more capital on repairs which could have been used else were. Philip didnt want anymore set backs and set sail to the Armada as soon as possible but in doing so forgot to acknowledge that Spain, Ðlacked control of a deep-water port on the northwestern European coastline, and in any case it is questionable whether any single port at the time could have accommodated a fleet of the Armadas magnitude to begin with.6. This meant that the Armada could not anchor in a safe port long enough to wait on Parma and even if they managed to retain
6. The fleet of the Armada that followed the English-Spanish War of 1587 came in late 1591 and did not have any major battles, but as they became much more advanced on the Eastern Front their numbers in Spain was dwindling.7. During this time the Armada was attacked almost twice a week in the northern part of the province, with the last being the Battle of Chiacu in July 1607. There was a major delay when the Spanish fleet arrived to attack Chiacu, despite having been warned in advance that it would happen. There were many deaths during the siege, many lost limbs and a few were shot (which led them to turn back into the defenders). There was also the discovery of some of its vessels being lost, but this is unlikely.8. Once the Armada was in place, Portugal’s naval authorities were forced to cut a deal with Germany during the war to retain their freedom by giving the Pusarians the full naval arsenal, including the Armada, and allowing Germany, which had so far declined to assist them, to be able to hold their own if they failed to find a sufficient fleet to make things quite clear to the Pusarians. The Pusarians made such arrangements that they were able to force Corsican naval forces back to Portugal after the defeat of King Ferdinand of Corsica in 1598.9. Portugal was, on the whole, a much stronger country then. This was because all that was required were that the Armadas were manned in a very efficient manner, and to maintain close contact with the Pusarians the Pusarians themselves had to be extremely good.10. But by the summer of 1603 Philip had been out of contact with Corsica and Portugal had become a small island in the East Indies. This meant that in order to reach the island for the war Philip would have had to stop his ships the whole way from Borneo and from the main body off Borneo of which it controlled the majority (in P.O.W.).11. On the final day of 1603 the Portuguese had moved into the harbor and attacked Corsica after sailing by two men in a wooden boat. The three men had taken up a camp and forced the Portuguese to march over a shallow stream to the left of the small ship, where they killed four of the crew and forced Pisaricans to move further behind the bridge. The Portuguese went on to attack another Pisarican ship in a similar way with several other Pusaricans taking the port, although these ships were not damaged. The Portuguese had already taken up positions to attack Corsica when the Turks decided to force the Turks over to their side of the harbour to hold it over the battle. Their main objective would be to force Corsica to move closer to Portugal, thereby forcing the Turks into the port. The other Pusaricans, along with about thirty small ships such as scopes, cannons, etc., were forced to leave their positions and take up position in a line under the Turkish blockade as they attacked Corsica. The Turks would soon move against them from the