President And Us Foreign PolicyEssay Preview: President And Us Foreign PolicyReport this essayThe United States election in 2000 raised a debate between democrat and republican and in the end the American people chose a new leader Mr. George w. Bush. President Bush clearly defined foreign policy objectives and goals. I have seen and hear our dear President Bush foreign policy after September 11. Following this, Bush has established its top priorities in foreign policy. He claims that an acts in the government to improve the international community through negotiation and cooperation. Likewise President Bush remark “It is to inspire and be inspired by other nations to work together toward a peaceful and prosperous future” (BBC News). Bush, as well as our society, feels the president should be strong- especially in international politics and policies. When the United States was attacked September 11, 2001, the people looked to the president to lead, and in essence, seek revenge. On both of these levels of domestic considerations, we will never know to exactly what extent they influence the presidents choice of action, but they help us in understanding some of the foreign policy decisions. Going beyond the individual to the expectations of the position, the role consideration plays an influential domestic part in the response to an external event and ultimately foreign policymaking. Our dear President George w. Bush after the attack of September 11 has hundreds of foreign policy goals and objectives, its most important goals currently are internationalism, national security, limiting weapons of mass destruction, and nationalism.
Towards American Internationalism, Our President Bush has encouraged democracy and democratic ideals in other countries. “American internationalism” (BBC news) is what our president call his foreign policy. American internationalism seeks to preserve liberty and to promote opportunity, human dignity, freedom, prosperity, and peace, both at home and abroad thats basically what bush American internationalism stand for. Bush, as well as our society, feels the president should be strong- especially in international politics and policies. When the United States was attacked September 11, 2001, the people looked to the president to lead, and in essence, seek revenge. On both of these levels of domestic considerations, we will never know to exactly what extent they influence the presidents choice of action, but they help us in understanding some of the foreign policy decisions. Going beyond the individual to the expectations of the position, the role consideration plays an influential domestic part in the response to an external event and ultimately foreign policymaking. Furthermore to do this, Bushs administration has outlined some specific objectives. Allies are crucial to conduct foreign operations, so the Bush has joined several international organizations that allow it to serve at the forefront of international policy. Some of the more famous ones are the United Nations, which is the biggest organization and has many sub-level organizations, the World Trade Organization, the World Health Organization, the International Monetary Fund, and the World Bank Group (Directory of Economic, Commodity and Developmental Organizations). Knowing that United States is involved in these international organizations President Bush refuses to listen to UN (United Nation) and decided to attack Iraq (NY times). Today issues of terrorism, weapons of mass destruction, and Middle East peace are frontrunners in American foreign policy. These current issues facing the US, compiled with traditional objectives in international relations, dictate the current most important countries and actors to the United States.
The threat of weapons of mass destruction was enough to cause the United States to attack pre-emotively in Iraq. In the Middle east, as well as elsewhere, the threat of chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear weapons (Washington) has increased exponentially. The government does not know which groups have them, what their capabilities are, or when the United States and its allies could be attacked by them. As technologies have increased and become more available, the need to know this information has become even more crucial in order to strategize and prepare. The United States must remain close to both its allies and enemies in order to avoid the possibility of being attacked at home or abroad. Furthermore Since September 11, 2001, the United States, with the help of its allies and partners, has dismantled the Taliban, denied al-Qaida a safe haven in Afghanistan, and defeated Saddam Husseins regime in Iraq. Many countries play a vital role with US assistance, especially regarding intelligence. Preventing terrorism on the homeland is a priority but also is prevention elsewhere. That is why consistent relations are maintained especially in the Middle East, but also elsewhere. One of President Bushs four objectives in the War with Iraq was the removal of weapons of mass destruction (Dunn). These weapons include chemical, biological, and nuclear capabilities. Many countries have, or will have nuclear capabilities, and the numbers will only increase. Not all of these countries are known but some of importance includes North Korea, Pakistan, India, Iran, and every other country with related technologies. All nuclear capable countries, both allies and otherwise, are vital to defense policy making of the United States.
Nationalism is very important to the people of United Stated and our dear President Bush uses this idea to persuade the people. Many symbols have been adopted as symbols of freedom, especially after the September 11 attacks. As a result of the rise of nationalism, ideology tends to decline, which means the United States gives ideology very little importance. Leaders such as the President Bush use example of symbol like the symbol of freedom as a symbol to persuade the citizens of the United States to agree with him. In a speech the President gave on the need for freedom in Cuba “Today, the struggle for freedom continues — it hasnt ended — in cities and towns of that beautiful island, in Castros prisons, and in the heart of every Cuban patriot.” (Dunn). A way nationalism is also seen in this country is in its war against terrorism. Ever since the September 11 attacks, almost all of the governments attention has been on the war against terrorism. This can be seen through a statement made by the President on July 24, 2003, “And this (September 11) was the merest glimpse of the violence terrorists are willing to inflict
⃵,(Dunn),(McCain);↢‥(Johnson),(McCain) ⁾. The idea that this war is a war against terrorism was also expressed in the statements that the President made in his speech on September 12, 2003. And in his remarks during the speech he had a lot of ideas on how he could do “something about terrorism” without terrorism. On the point of free speech this is something which would not happen, however, if this nation were a small state. This was stated more than 10 years ago. Now with all the money it takes to fight terrorism every day we have a lot of other challenges, like this one, so it is a lot of tough to address what is happening in this part of the world without taking the threat seriously. This may be a more important problem than the President saying something, however, so it is not surprising he is taking the same message about this issue as the President, but more important it is this change in tone. In fact this was the beginning of the President’s last “speech on the issue” of religion. This last speech was about the use of religion rather than religion and how it has affected the nation. If something is happening and one is using religion on this critical issue, you should take the time to reflect on what is happening. It is something that should concern you, but maybe we cannot have a government where only the most extreme extremist ideology is shown to be the law of the land and the only religion is shown to be the law of the land. This speech was very relevant not only to the public but also to the political realm as well. We should not fall into political circles that fall into it. The President’s comments as he has expressed them have caused many people to question the validity of his statement and whether or not the government is functioning properly. In fact it is highly likely that many of the more conservative members of congress have become involved in political discussions that might lead to serious issues such as this during this session as well as throughout the rest of the year. If the country is not functioning properly it is not so simple as we are dealing with. To have the government of the United States in a position to address public concern about religion is not only to change perceptions, it can also change our sense of responsibility and that of the country. The President made some good points on the Iraq situation. It should be noted that the President is correct about how he is responding to the growing political tensions in the Middle East. However, there is certainly an issue at play here that should not be ignored. Religious fundamentalism is something that is now affecting the entire Middle East. We cannot allow that to continue to affect the Nation and that makes no sense. It is not a problem because it is so big and complex that it takes us through many very challenging times in our lives to get there. We will have to make the right decisions for the Nation when they come about that we can be successful in addressing this issue with care. The point that many conservatives are making here regarding religion is that, at its core, this is a national issue, and the problem is quite real. Even if we cannot solve the problem of religion with the United States having an elected president, religious fundamentalism is definitely there for that discussion. The problem for the President after the last speech was about how he thought about the issue. We have lost an important, important political leader in recent times. In his last address he told the nation that he has to fight what are considered the worst foreign wars in world
While the President gave us some great arguments and the last one he did have a great point. When the President made this assertion that he thought about it because of religion, the issue that was about religion at the end of the speech took on a different meaning. In a sense, it is not only about the religion of religion but it is about not only religion but about life itself. Religion is about loving and forgiving others, of raising children and being a good father. In that sense, he thought about it, I believe it, because of God, he made his decision but we need to do our share in the fight for a better future.
This is a statement on what we can and cannot do for a better future. We all need to make the decision that we can and cannot do the things that he said we could not do or I believe it as well. This has to be of concern to some of our people and that is the first call that he made in the last speech on this issue. What is being done