The Indian Act and Its Effect on Modern SocietyEssay Preview: The Indian Act and Its Effect on Modern SocietyReport this essayThe Indian Act and its Effect on Modern SocietyThe Indian Act is one of the most outdated and irrelevant pieces of legislature ever written. In 1876, the Crown consolidated all existing laws pertaining to Indians, and called this new document the Indian Act. They did not solicit input from Aboriginal people and in fact, at that time, Aboriginal people were not even allowed to vote for or against the politicians who were creating this Act. If this Act was written in 1876, what effect could it possibly have on anyone today? The answer to this is complex and requires an analysis of what is contained within the Act.
(1) • The Indian Act was intended to prevent the “torture, arbitrary, or otherwise cruel treatment” of Native Americans.
For those who wish to examine the “Indian Act in the Context of the Nation and of our Peoples” (1670), it is useful to consider the issue for themselves, including the notion that the Indian Act was written as a means of achieving “equality” between natives and settlers or the “Indian Act was intended to deter that discrimination.The American Indian Act was introduced in a state legislature at the height of the New Deal to assist with issues related to the American Indian Territory and the West Indian and Native American population in the state. The act provided that “If this [Indian Act] of 1777 was adopted in any State of the Union, it shall be enacted in the State Legislatures of any State in which there is not more than one Indian or Native person, on account of age, residence, color, sex, or person of any kind, to be enrolled at an Indian or Native place of employment, place of study, or school for the enjoyment or in any other manner than that provided by law”, or in the case of the Pacific Island nations, of a state law. An exception was not made to this requirement regarding a “purchase by Indians”, but it still applied to people who had been enrolled in programs that encouraged them to engage in productive development projects, such as agriculture, construction of dams, or recreation facilities.[i]It was a mistake to suggest that the Indian Act was designed as enforcement of laws that had come into force long before 1881; that it served to justify a more expansive approach to Native Americans and an approach that had a much larger impact on the state of New York than could be anticipated with current public policies. For the last 15 years, Native American society has been very restricted by the limited and limited actions of law enforcement and government, and the lack of federal oversight.In the end, the Indian Act was written because the Native American people had been waiting years for a change to occur, so its application to them was unnecessary. It would have been difficult to write an Indian Act because that would be a matter that the states would find difficult to carry out, and so Native Americans were left largely to their own devices. Instead, it was written using the terms of the treaties that would have required the states to accept indigenous populations. The Act was intended as an opportunity to expand Native American rights in New York, and to expand rights within the community.[ii] For many years now Indians have received only partial rights protection from the Indian Act, and at no time have they been treated in public as the full and equal citizens of North America.[iii] (2) • In 1875, the United States government signed onto the Treaty of Bismarck. It was a treaty between the European Community and the United Arab Emirates, where the states of France and Belgium had also signed.[iv] The
Many Aboriginal people have lost all they had and have been disadvantaged because of the Indian Act and the theories of why it was written are weak at best. One theory is that the policies were will-intentioned but misdirected. Many of the scholars who believe this look at the policies as a measure to protect “Indians and Indian lands” from exploitation and encroachment by other new settlers. They also contend that Canadian government policy was supposed to help Aboriginal people to “progress” and transform from wards of the state into citizens. However, what the Crown refused to acknowledge is that Aboriginals did not want to be citizens. They had a very different culture and way of looking at things and the Canadian governments way of doing things was contrary to their belief systems. Over time, the measures originally intended to protect the land base were progressively loosened to open up reserve lands for farming, settlement and other purposes (as the Crown saw fit). There were also treaty provisions created which permitted the federal government to take up reserve lands for public works of Canada. When Aboriginals complained that their rights were being ignored, they tried to make land claims so the Canadian government simply made it illegal for them to get a lawyer or legal advice.
Other people argue that reserves were created simply to isolate Aboriginal people in federally controlled areas in order to facilitate assimilation. They also allege that government policies represented a deliberate attempt to destroy traditional forms of government to stop any initiative for independent political action. If they could cut off Aboriginals from their culture, the Canadian government would be able to assimilate them into Canadian culture and they would have to depend on the government for support. This will be discussed in more detail later. No matter which of these theories was believed, they were both based on racist and ethnocentric assumptions that Aboriginal people had it all wrong. It was almost as if the Canadian government believed Aboriginals were not living before the Canadian government got here, simply surviving. And, it seems that the government felt that the Aboriginals were doing a poor job of surviving.
Therefore, to help the Aboriginal people out, the Crown wrote the Indian Act. It contained 12 major sections. The first was about “Indian land”. This section says that the Crown held all land titles and bands could not make decisions regarding their land. Further amendments were made so that the superintendent general had more power over reserve lands and bands had less. At a later date, the Crown gave itself the power to give away Aboriginal reserve land as it saw fit. When the Aboriginals complained, the Crown simply arranged it so that Aboriginals had no access to legal advice and they were therefore unable to make any land claims.
The second section of the Indian Act talks about law-making power. Originally, politicians passed the Indian Act without any input from Aboriginal people. In fact, Aboriginals could not even vote for or against the politicians passing the act! Band councils were the only form of officially recognized government but they were forced to elect a new Chief and band council every two years, regardless of their traditions. This caused many problems and inconsistencies within the councils and they were not functional. In addition to this, they had no real law-making power. The Crown maintained its position at the top of the hierarchy.
The next section dealt with Enfranchisement. This was a process by which Aboriginals could be granted full Canadian citizenship if they relinquished their ties to their community, their culture, and their traditions. When there was only one person who voluntarily enfranchised, federal officials then made it mandatory for all those who got higher education to enfranchise as well. Unmarried Indian women were also allowed to seek enfranchisement. At one point, it became compulsory for Indian women who married non-Indian men to be enfranchised. This section has since been amended, as it was incredibly sexist. There was a different set of rules that applied to women and therefore, many women lost their status as Indians and therefore were not granted the same rights as status Indians. This affected not only the women who chose enfranchisement but their future children and grandchildren as well!
The fourth section was entitled Justice Administration and stated that the department of Indian affairs had authority to enforce its own regulations. The Indian agents were able to enforce laws and hold trials as they saw fit on reserve land. There were also restrictions on the Indian and Mйtis rights to protest, and on their ability to buy ammunition, which seriously restricted their ability to hunt and to provide for their families. Aboriginals were only part of justice system as the accused and they could not hire a lawyer or mount a defence. Because reserves were so remote in nature, many Aboriginals often only had access to the judicial system in the form of circuit courts that were enforcing Canadian criminal law. Because of this, the police and the courts were usually unable and/or unwilling to accommodate Indian values and concepts of justice.
The fifth section of the Indian Act was an attack on traditional Aboriginal culture. Canadian governments maintained that they needed to protect Indians from their own culture. Traditional dances, customs, and celebrations were prohibited. This included traditional Indian costumes.
The sixth and seventh sections of the Indian Act covered recreation. The first of these outlined that it was an offense for Aboriginals to be intoxicated. It was also an offense to sell liquor to an Aboriginal. In cases where Aboriginals were able to get alcohol, it was a further offense to fail to disclose the name of the person that had sold them the alcohol. Alcohol was used to bribe Aboriginal people who felt confused because of the Indian Act. Drinking was one of the ways they could escape. The second section regarding recreation was called the poolroom prohibition. This gave the superintendent